Case law

Brown v. State

383 S.C. 506 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jul 27, 2009

Stokes v. … State v.

Willenbrock v. Brown

239 So. 2d 922 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1970

Wight, Jr. v. Carl BROWN. No. 45884. Supreme Court of Mississippi. October 12, 1970. *923 Jack Parsons, Wiggins, Edward J. Currie, Jr., Hattiesburg, for appellants. R.L. Calhoun, Hattiesburg, William E. … In Crabb v.

Brown v. White

202 Pa. 297 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1902

“We do not doubt,” said Gordon, J., in Knauss v. … To the same effect are Fow v. Roberts, 108 Pa. *312 489 , Wunder v. McLean, 134 Pa. 334 , and Reading City v. Reiner, 167 Pa. 41 .

State v. Brown

35 Wash. 2d 379 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1949

In State v. … In State v.

Brown v. Westerfield

47 Neb. 399 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1896

(Byington v. Moore, 62 Ia., 470 ; Hinson v. Bailey, 73 Ia., 544 ; Black v. Hoyt, 33 O. St., 203; Lessee of Mitchell v. Ryan, 3 O. St., 377; Albright v. Albright, 70 Wis., 528 ; Ball v. Foreman, 37 O. … (Bunz v. Cornelius, 19 Neb., 107 ; Connell v. Galligher, 39 Neb., 793 .)

Paulette v. Brown

40 Mo. 52 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1867

In the case of the State v. … In the case of the State v.

Brown v. Hows

163 Tenn. 178 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1931

In Stratton v. … The foregoing was approved in Hascall v. Hafford, 107 Tenn., 355 , and language of the same import was used in Brown v. Brown, 150 Tenn., 89 . In Denny v.

Birckhead v. Brown

2 Denio 375 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1845

Brown & Co. under the circumstances stated in the special verdict became parties to that contract, and were entitled to enforce it by action against the defendants. … Brown & Co. rity of contract between the *377 plaintiffs and the defendants, and agreeing substantially with the positions laid down in the opinion of the supreme court.

Beata Zarzecki v. Merrick B. Garland

124 F.4th 1058 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 3, 2025

.; see also Arej v. Sessions, 852 F.3d 665, 667 (7th Cir. 2017) (“[T]he Board cannot make a reasoned decision to deny a mo- tion to reopen if it ignores the evidence that a petitioner pre- sents.”); Ward v. … Guerra Rocha v. Barr, 951 F.3d 848, 853 (7th Cir. 2020) (quoting Mansour v. I.N.S., 230 F.3d 902, 908 (7th Cir. 2000)). The Board sufficiently met its obliga- tions here and applied the proper standard of review.

Brown v. State

96 S.W.3d 508 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Oct 31, 2002

A jury found appellant Lamont Ray Brown guilty of aggravated sexual assault and the trial court assessed punishment at imprisonment for fifty-five years. See Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 22.021 (West Supp. 2001). … Moreno v. State, 858 S.W.2d 453, 463 (Tex.Crim.App.1993); Corley v. State, *512 987 S.W.2d 615, 618 (Tex.App.-Austin 1999, no pet.).

JOHNSON v. BROWN

2024 OK CIV APP 18 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 27, 2024

OSCN Found Document:JOHNSON v. BROWN Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only JOHNSON v. … BROWN, BROWN, WOOD, AND SCHOELEN, INC., an Oklahoma Corporation, Nominal Defendant, v. JOYCE K. BROWN, Trustee of the Joyce Brown Trust Dated 12-31-92, and as Trustee of the Dorsey N.

State v. Brown

903 P.2d 459 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1995

903 P.2d 459 (1995) 127 Wash.2d 749 The STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. James Edward BROWN, Petitioner. No. 62275-2. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. … See State v.

Brown v. Siegel

191 Wis. 256 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1926

Ellis v. Barron County, 120 Wis. 390 , 98 N. W. 232 . No written notice of the entry of the order having been served, the appeal was within time.

State v. Brown

27 Vt. 619 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Apr 15, 1855

People v. Brown

24 N.Y.2d 421 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1969

Brown walked away from him and entered a building at 126th Street and came out shortly thereafter and rejoined Mr. Brown. I observed Mr. Brown and that other person come close together. … People v. White, 16 N Y 2d 270), and no misstatements when questioned about observed activity (People v.

Brown v. State

87 Tex. Crim. 261 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 28, 1920

Ross v. State. 10 Texas Crim. App., 458; Peter v. State, 23 Texas Crim. App., 684; Goodman v. State, 4 Texas Crim. App., 349; Williams v. State, 41 Texas Crim. Rep., 365 ; Miers v. State, 34 Texas Crim. … Woods v. State, 3 Texas Crim. App., 204; Maner v. State, 8 Texas Crim. App., 361; Staples v. State, 14 Texas Crim. App., 136.

Beaumont v. Brown

401 Mich. 80 · Michigan Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1977

Defendant Barry Brown was director of the Department of Labor at that time and defendant Arthur Zink was the personnel director. … court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter for the reason that the Court of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction of suits, ex delicto and ex contracta, brought against the state and any of its departments, commissions, boards

State v. Brown

300 N.C. 41 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1980

Appeal of Defendant Brown Defendant Brown first assigns as error the denial of his motion to sever the charged offenses. … State v. Scott, supra.

Brown v. Staples

138 La. 602 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 8, 1915

Brown v. State

52 Tex. Crim. 267 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 1907