Case law

Brown v. Burmania

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 2022

See Sosa v. Alvarez–Machain, 542 U.S. 692, 734 (2004) (“[T]he Declaration does not of its own force impose obligations as a matter of international law.”); Vizi v. Outback Steakhouse, 672 F. … June 2, 2022) (recognizing Third Circuit’s ruling in United States v. Chatman, 351 F.

Brown v. District of Columbia

853 A.2d 733 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 2004

George v. … Hardi v. Mezzanotte, 818 A.2d 974, 981 (D.C. *737 2003) (citing Morton v. National Med. Enters., 725 A.2d 462, 468 (D.C.1999)). .

Brown v. Black

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 2022

BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v … See Sosa v. Alvarez– Machain, 542 U.S. 692, 734 (2004) (“[T]he Declaration does not of its own force impose obligations as a matter of international law.”); Vizi v. Outback Steakhouse, 672 F.

Brown v. Hecht Co.

137 F.2d 689 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 18, 1943

Brown, Administrator, v. Hecht Company, D.C., 49 F.Supp. 528 . 7 Fed.Reg. 3153. … Wallace, 8 Cir., 75 F.2d 733 ; Educators Ass’n v. Federal Trade Commission, 2 Cir., 108 F.2d 470, 473 ; Gimbel Bros. v. Federal Trade Commission, 2 Cir., 116 F.2d 578 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Brown v. United States

631 F. Supp. 954 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 1986

See Keller v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 679 F.2d 220 (11th Cir.1982); Cook v. Arentzen, 582 F.2d 870 (4th Cir.1978). In this District, in Davila v. … See Pinar, supra, 747 F.2d at 913 ; Carducci, supra, 714 F.2d at 176, citing Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970), Board of Regents v.

District of Columbia v. Brown

589 A.2d 384 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1991

We disagree with Brown’s position. … In Scoggins v. Jude, 419 A.2d 999 (D.C.1980) and Banks v.

Trent Coburn v. Patrick J. Murphy

827 F.3d 1122 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 2016

Before: HENDERSON, ∗ BROWN, AND PILLARD, Circuit Judges. … Judge  2 Opinion filed for the Court by Circuit Judge BROWN. BROWN, Circuit Judge: This case returns following our first decision in Coburn v.

Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

717 A.2d 309 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 1998

Co. v. … . *317 Schleft v. Board of Educ. of the Los Alamos Public Schools, 109 N.M. 271 , 784 P.2d 1014, 1017-18 (1989); Sutton v. Monongahela Power Co., 151 W.Va. 961 , 158 S.E.2d 98, 104 (1967); but cf. Hayes v.

Brown v. United States

99 F.2d 131 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 1938

In McHenry v. … Affirmed. 1 Stout v. State, 76 Md. 317, 330 , 25 A. 299, 303 . 2 Bennett v. Commonwealth, 106 Va. 834 , 55 S.E. 698 .

Brown v. Caulfield

531 F. Supp. 2d 112 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 24, 2008

This matter is before the Court on Ralph Brown’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. For the reasons stated below, the petition will be denied. I. … Lane v. Williams, 455 U.S. 624, 631 , 102 S.Ct. 1322 , 71 L.Ed.2d 508 (1982) (attack on sentences which expired during course of habeas proceedings rendered case moot); Kimberlin v.

T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. NLRB

90 F.4th 564 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 12, 2024

Thus, we reverse the Board “only when the record is so compelling that no reasonable factfinder” could agree with the Board. Bally’s Park Place, Inc. v. NLRB, 646 F.3d 929, 935 (D.C. … Co. v. NLRB, 192 F.3d 133, 143 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).

Brown v. Bush

112 F. App'x 66 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 10, 2004

United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 693 , 94 S.Ct. 3090 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1974). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Brown v. Bush

111 F. App'x 614 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 1, 2004

See generally Swan v. Clinton, 100 F.3d 973 , 976 n. 1 & 977 (D.C.Cir.1996). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Tindal v. McHugh

945 F. Supp. 2d 111 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 23, 2013

IMS, P.C. v. Alvarez, 129 F.3d 618, 623 (D.C. Cir. 1997); accord Camp v. … Marcum v. Salazar, 751 F. Supp. 2d 74, 78 (D.D.C. 2010); accord City of Dania Beach v. FAA, 628 F.3d 581, 590 (D.C.

Catherine Cotton v. I. Michael Heyman, Secretary, the Smithsonian Institution

63 F.3d 1115 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 1995

See also White v. … In Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 744 (D.C.Cir.1979), we observed that the release of any government document benefits the public by increasing its knowledge of its government.

Williams v. United States

205 A.3d 837 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2019

Accord Carter v. … See Swarthout v.

United States v. Brown

179 F. Supp. 478 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1959

Brown, was prejudiced in the trial of his case by the familiarity of juror No. 8, Atha N. Henson, with one of the witnesses for the defense, Mrs. Vina Smith, defendant’s mother. … Because of the undisputed evidence adduced at the contempt hearing, as appears more particularly in the memorandum filed this day in United States v. Henson, D.C., 179 F.Supp. 474 , that Mrs. Henson recognized Mrs.

Brown v. United States

30 F.2d 474 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 7, 1929

To tho same effect are Wagner v. State, 80 Tex. Cr. R. 66 , 188 S. W. 1001 ; Boles v. State 86 Ga. 255 , 12 S. E. 361 ; Willis v. State, 105 Ga. 633 , 32 S. E. 155 ; State v. Conley, 280 Mo. 21 , 217 S. … W. 29 ; Schraeder v. State, 28 Ohio App. 248 , 162 N. E. 647 ; People v. Niemoth, 322 Ill. 51 , 152 N. E. 537 ; Livesey v. Helbig, 87 N. J. Law, 303, 94 A. 47 .

Emmco Insurance Company v. Brown

178 A.2d 429 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1962

In United States v. … David v. Nemerofsky, D.C.Mun.App., 41 A.2d 838 . 6 . Litchfield Admr. v. Crane Admr., supra, note 5. 7 . In Llanes v.

Dengel v. Brown

1 App. D.C. 423 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 8, 1893

Steiner v. Kolb, 57 Penn. St., 123 ; Quillman v. Custer, 57 Penn. St., 125 ; McCray v. Lipp, 35 Ind., 116 ; Andrews v. Spurlin, 35 Ind., 262 ; Brown v. Lawrence, 3 Cush., *429 390 ; Brown v. Lyon, 6 N. … Newton v. Griffith, 1 H. & G., 111, 127 ; Hoxton v. Archer, 3 G. & J., 212 .