Opinion

United States v. Brown

  • 179 F. Supp. 478
  • 1959 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2411
Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Dec 15, 1959
Status
Published
Author
Youngdahl
On the bench
Youngdahl
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 64.7%

The opinion

YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.

The Court is unable to determine whether the defendant, Jessie C. Brown, was prejudiced in the trial of his case by the familiarity of juror No. 8, Atha N. Henson, with one of the witnesses for the defense, Mrs. Vina Smith, defendant’s mother. Because of the undisputed evidence adduced at the contempt hearing, as appears more particularly in the memorandum filed this day in United States v. Henson, D.C., 179 F.Supp. 474 , that Mrs. Henson recognized Mrs. Smith when she took the witness stand and then failed to notify the Court, the Court finds it necessary, sua sponte, to grant a new trial.

Accordingly, it is by the Court this 15th day of December, 1959,

Ordered that the defendant be, and he hereby is granted a new trial.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.