Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

1.66s

  • CNA Insurance Companies v. Magnuson

    119 Or. App. 282 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 21, 1993

    It argues that the Board erroneously interpreted and applied ORS 656.262(6). We affirm. … The amendment allowing back-up denials specifically sought to change the law articulated in Bauman v. SAIF, 295 Or 788 , 670 P2d 1027 (1983).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Huggett v. Kelly

    370 Or. 645 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 2022

    Petitioner appealed and her appeal was certified to the Supreme Court under ORS 19.405, along with two other similar cases, Watkins v. Ackley, (A176245)(S068825), and Jones v. Brown, (A175780)(S068824). … Held: (1) Under the Court’s analysis and decision in Watkins v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown

    District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 5, 2026

    A at 2- 3, 7; Decl. of Byron Brown Supp. Pl. Resp. (“Brown Decl.”), ECF 49-2, ¶¶ 2.2 Plaintiff makes a profit on the majority of the days he works. Wilson Decl. Ex. A at 9-10. … Lasley v. Combined Transp., Inc., 234 Or. App. 11, 16, 227 P.3d 1200 (2010) (citing Buchler v. Or. Corr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Estate of MacMullen

    117 Or. 505 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1926

    C. 317; Nave v. Salmon, 51 Ind. 159 ; Knight v. Hamakar, 40 Or. 424, 431 ( 67 Pac. 107 ); In re Ross’ Estate, 179 Cal. 358 ( 182 Pac. 303 ); In re Snowball Estate, 156 Cal. 235 ( 104 Pac. 446 ). … A similar holding was announced in Ford v. Gilbert, 44 Or. 259, 262 ( 75 Pac. 138 ).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Schleiss v. SAIF Corp.

    250 Or. App. 458 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 13, 2012

    Claimant also argues that the board’s order conflicts with Supreme Court precedent. He contends that, in Barrett v. … Barrett v. D & H Drywall, 300 Or 553, 555-56 , 715 P2d 90 (1986) (Barrett 77).

    Reversed on other grounds by Schleiss v. SAIF Corp., 354 Or. 637 (2013)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Woodward

    1 Or. App. 338 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 18, 1969

    State v. … Lyons, 247 Or 255 , 428 P2d 890 (1967); State v. Poole, 161 Or 481 , 90 P2d 472 (1939). The exhibit here is duly certified by the Secretary of the Oregon State Board of Health. In Finchum v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Stevenson v. Blue Cross

    108 Or. App. 247 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 24, 1991

    Dethlefs v. Hyster Co., 295 Or 298, 310 , 667 P2d 487 (1983). Claimant also assigns as error that the Board concluded that SAIF had not accepted her claim for tendonitis. She argues that, under Bowman, v. … Georgia-Pacific v. Piwowar, 305 Or 494, 500 , 753 P2d 948 (1988); see also Johnson v. Spectra Physics, 303 Or 49, *252 56 , 733 P2d 1367 (1987).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Aetna Casualty Co. v. Jackson

    108 Or. App. 253 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 24, 1991

    In Randall v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp., 107 Or App 599 , 813 P2d 1120 (1991), we held that ORS 656.262(10) does not provide an independent basis for the award of *257 attorney fees. … In Morgan v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Farmers Insurance Group v. Huff

    149 Or. App. 298 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 23, 1997

    The Board explained, pursuant to Dickson v. … Next, the Board concluded that under Motel 6 v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Matter of Compensation of Cowart

    94 Or. App. 288 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 7, 1988

    Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board on our remand. In Cowart v. … See Armstrong v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Troupe v. Labor Ready, Inc.

    191 Or. App. 258 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 2003

    The board affirmed. … Ligatich v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp., 185 Or App 555, 561 , 60 P3d 1143 (2003). In this case, the board’s finding is supported by substantial evidence. Affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Blair v. State Accident Insurance Fund

    21 Or. App. 229 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 1975

    Nolan v. SAIF, 7 Or App 46 , 489 P2d 974 (1971). … See: Pate v. S.I.A.C., 238 Or 499 , 395 P2d 438 (1964); Buell v. S.I.A.C., 238 Or 492 , 395 P2d 442 (1964); Hamrich v. S.I.A.C., 246 Or 229 , 424 P2d 894 (1967).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lederer v. Viking Freight, Inc.

    193 Or. App. 226 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 2004

    See Menasha Corp. v. Crawford, 332 Or 404, 413 , 29 P3d 1129 (2001). … , we do not review the board’s construction of the rule under the deferential standard of Don’t Waste Oregon Com. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. James

    61 Or. App. 30 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 1982

    In the first, we affirmed the Board’s original order that found claimant’s disability to be compensable. James v. SAIF, 44 Or App 405 , 605 P2d 1368 (1980). … In SAIF v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Messmer v. Deluxe Cabinet Works

    130 Or. App. 254 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 14, 1994

    Drews v. EBI Companies, supra, 310 Or at 149 ; Hammon Stage Line v. Stinson, 123 Or App 418, 422 , 859 P2d 1180 (1993). There is no argument in this case that the determination order is not final. … The Board erred in concluding that employer is not required to treat the degenerative condition, which has now worsened, as part of the compensable claim. Therefore, we remand to the Board for reconsideration.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Wilkinson v. Jay's Contracting, Inc.

    76 Or. App. 142 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1985

    The Builders Board is required to make findings of fact and conclusions of law in a contested case. ORS 183.470(2). Its conclusions of law must be rationally based on its findings of fact. See Bremer v. … Schumauch v. Johnston, 274 Or 441 , 547 P2d 119 (1976); Turner v. Jackson, 139 Or 539, 560 , 11 P2d 1048 (1932). See also Edenfield v. Woodlawn Manor, Inc., 62 Tenn App 280, 462 SW2d 237 (1971).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • SAIF Corp. v. Abbott

    107 Or. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 1991

    It contends that our conclusion that it had accepted responsibility for claimant’s carpal tunnel syndrome is inconsistent with Georgia-Pacific v. Piwowar, 305 Or 494 , 753 P2d 948 (1988). … Therefore, the Board never reviewed the proper record, and the referee’s conclusions regarding employer’s acceptance could not have been adequately reviewed by the Board.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. George

    183 Or. App. 583 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 25, 2002

    State v. Amini, 331 Or 384, 394 , 15 P3d 541 (2000). … State v.

    Reversed on other grounds by State v. George, 337 Or. 329 (2004)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Stark v. McKenna

    124 Or. 332 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1928

    He cannot accept the benefits of the transaction and repudiate the parts thereof disadvantageous to him: Dillard v. Olalla, 52 Or. 126 ( 94 Pac. 966 , 96 Pac. 678 ); Rae v. … J., and McBride and Brown, JJ., concur.'

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Rubalcaba v. Nagaki Farms, Inc.

    333 Or. 614 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 11, 2002

    In Louvring v. … S-W Floor Cover Shop v. Nat’l. Council on Comp.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.