Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

4.63s

  • Hisel v. State

    97 Okla. Crim. 356 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1953

    In Thompson v. … State v. Stegall, 96 Okla. Cr. 281 , 253 P. 2d 183 ; Delano v. State, 82 Okla. Cr. 258 , 168 P. 2d 659 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • School District No. 60 of Ellis County v. Crabtree

    146 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 11, 1930

    There is some conflict in the evidence as to the purpose of that meeting, the date on which it was held, and whether or not it conformed to the rule stated in Board of Ed. of Town of Carney v. … LESTER, V. C. J., and HUNT and RILEY, JJ., absent.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Rice v. State Ex Rel. Short

    108 Okla. 4 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1924

    Cook et al. v. United States, 91 U. S. 389 , 23 L. Ed. 237 ; United States v. Bostwick, 94 U. S. 53 , 24 L. Ed. 65 ; United States v. Commercial Co., 74 Fed. 145 ; see, also, Fretz v. … Ass’n v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Garr v. Minnick

    100 Okla. 109 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 1924

    McAlester v. Williams, 77 Okla. 65 , 186 Pac. 461 ; Sierzek et al. v. Smith et al., 86 Okla. 797 , 202 Pac. 611 ; Beaty v. Armstrong, 95 Okla. 109 , 218 Pac. 516 . … J. 595, section 615; Brown v. Coppedge 54 Okla. 88 , 153 Pac. 817 : Levin v. Cook, 84 Okla. 55 , 202 Pac. 299 . 3.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Rogers, Treasurer v. Duncan

    57 Okla. 20 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1916

    Greer v. McNeal, 11 Okla. 519 , 69 Pac. 891 ; Ex parte Brown, 3 Okla. Cr. 329 , 105 Pac. 577 ; 24 Cyc.; Sockey et al. v. Winstock, 43 Okla. 758 , 144 Pac. 372 . … Lake County v. Sulphur Bank Quicksilver Mining Co., 66 Cal. 18 , 4 Pac. 876 ; Ames v. People, 26 Colo. 83 , 56 Pac. 656 ; Hamilton v. Fondulac, 25 Wis. 490 ; Bird v. Benlisa, 142 U. S. 664 , 12 Sup. Ct. 323, 35 L.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Isom v. State

    646 P.2d 1288 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 1982

    The appellant cites Lovell v. State, 455 P.2d 735 (Okl.Cr.1969) and Harris v. … There is ample evidence to support a finding that the appellant was driving while intoxicated at the time of the accident. *1293 The appellant argues that Brown v. State, 584 P.2d 231 (Okl.Cr.1978) and Winter v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Bowen v. Brock

    206 Okla. 516 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1952

    In the motion request is made that the court take notice of its files and records in district court Case No. 19326, being entitled, The State of Oklahoma, Plaintiff, v. Mrs. Curtis Thompson, President, J. W. … Bynum v. Strain, 95 Okla. 45 , 218 P. 883 ; Wentz v. Thomas, 159 Okla. 124 , 15 P. 2d 65 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • George L. Verity Management Development Corp. v. Keyes

    63 O.B.A.J. 1924 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1992

    On the third Monday of September (the date the Board was to have ended its session according to 68 O.S.Supp.1985, § 2459) 1 there were still several thousand protests the Board had not been able to consider. … The authority of the Equalization Board, after its statutory adjournment date, to adjust and equalize assessments pursuant to timely filed protests, is affirmatively established by our opinion in Castro v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Maddox v. Hunt

    183 Okla. 465 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1938

    Reardon v. … J. 714, sec 66; Glasco v. State Election Board (1926) 121 Okla. 119 , 248 P. 642 , and authorities therein cited.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Leake v. Jones

    18 F.R.D. 80 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1955

    Faced with that situation, the board of directors of the corporation, consisting of the taxpayer, Marjory Griffin Leake, James C. … Commissioner, 8 Cir., 76 F.2d 472 , certiorari denied Randolph v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 599 , 56 S.Ct. 116 , 80 L.Ed. 425 ; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Champion, 6 Cir., 78 F.2d 513 ; Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Phenis v. State

    28 Okla. Crim. 142 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1924

    Bennett v. State, 21 Okla. Cr. 27 , 204 Pac. 462 ; Douglas v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 648 , 179 Pac. 947 ; Williams v. Ter., 13 Ariz. 27 , 108 Pac. 243 , 27 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1032. … Taylor v. Ter., 2 Okla. Cr. 1 , 99 Pac. 628 ; Fuller v. Ter., 2 Okla. Cr. 86 , 99 Pac. 1098 ; Helsey v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 98 , 193 Pac. 50 , 17 A. L. R. 197; State v. Miller, 47 Or. 562 , 85 Pac. 81 , 6 L. R. A. (N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

    164 Okla. 239 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1933

    In re Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co., 43 Okla. 307 , 142 P. 997 ; Board of Com’rs v. Ryan, Co. Treas., 107 Okla. 278 , 232 P. 834 ; Board of Com’rs v. … State Board, 155 Okla. 183 , 8 P. (2d) 732 ; El Reno Wholesale Groc. Co. v. Taylor, 87 Okla. 140 , 209 P. 749 ; Protest of Eirst Nat. Bank of Guthrie, 136 Okla. 141 , 276 P. 766 ; Prince, Co. Treas., v. St. L.-S. F. Ry.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Silver Griddle Co. v. City of Oklahoma City

    570 P.2d 619 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1977

    Martin v. Harrah Independent School District, supra; Melton v. City of Durant, supra. … Lincoln Income Life Insurance Co. v. Wood, 556 P.2d 602 (Okl.1976); Martin v. Harrah Independent School District, supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • City of Grandfield v. Hammonds

    100 Okla. 75 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1924

    The boards were placed back exactly as they were except the board that was broken and another board was substituted in place of the broken board. … In the case of Turner v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF OKLAHOMA v. ZIRIAX

    463 P.3d 524 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 2020

    TYREE Discussed 2009 OK 9 , 204 P.3d 58 , IN THE MATTER OF REINSTATEMENT OF PACENZA Discussed 2014 OK 8 , 319 P.3d 674 , GENTGES v. OKLAHOMA STATE ELECTION BOARD Discussed 2018 OK 39 , 419 P.3d 224 , GENTGES v. … OKLAHOMA STATE ELECTION BOARD Discussed 2019 OK 6 , 441 P.3d 1094 , MCINTOSH v. WATKINS Discussed 2019 OK 83 , VIDEO GAMING TECHNOLOGIES v. ROGERS COUNTY BD. OF TAX ROLL CORRECTIONS Cited Title 12.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schaff, Rec. v. Borum, Co. Treas.

    82 Okla. 284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1921

    Co. v. Scammon (Kan.) 25 Pac. 858 ; B. & M. R. Co. v. Board County Commissioners (Neb.) 11 N. W. 332 ; Wells Co. v. McHenry (N. D.) 74 N. W. Rep. 241 . … Co. v. Lane, 69 Oklahoma, 170 Pac. 502 . We believe that the rule announced in the case of Lusk et al. v. White, and Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hardy Sanitarium v. Dehart

    164 Okla. 29 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 1933

    Kindall v. McBirney (Idaho) 11 P. (2d) 370 ; Employers Liability Assur. Corp. v. Industrial Accident Comm., 187 Cal. 615 , 203 P. 95 ; J. B. Herd Hardware Co. v. … Co. v. Thomas, 162. Okla. 5, 18 P. (2d) 891 ; Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. Mathews, 162 Okla. 283 , 20 P. (2d) 141 . This jurisdictional question has been considered recently by the court in several cases.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Application of Grimes

    494 P.2d 635 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1971

    Oklahoma Bar Ass’n v. Grimes, Okl., 354 P.2d 1080 (1960). … Dabney v. Ledbetter, 162 Okl. 20 , 18 P.2d 1085 *637 (1933); Maggart v. State Bar of California, 29 Cal.2d 439 , 175 P.2d 505 (1946).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Hibbs

    86 Okla. Crim. 113 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1948

    Kennedy v. State, 66 Okla. Cr. 318 , 92 P. 2d 384 ; Abby v. State, 72 Okla. Cr. 208 , 114 P. 2d 499 , 115 P. 2d 266 ; Kidd v. State, 76 Okla. Cr. 213 , 136 P. 2d 210 ; Murphy v. State, 72 Okla. … Cr. 1 , 112 P. 2d 438 ; Mannon v. State, 68 Okla. Cr. 267 , 93 P. 2d 73 ; Cunningham v. State, 70 Okla. Cr. 131 , 105 P. 2d 264 ; and Lewis Grayson v. State, 85 Okla. Cr. 266 , 188 P. 2d 696 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Nagle

    55 Okla. 235 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1916

    This board was taken from one of the demolished cars, which was afterwards burned. The ditch was from four to six feet deep. *246 The rule applicable here is stated in Mayne v. C., R. I. & P. Ry. … Gulf, etc., Ry. v. Jackson, 65 Fed. 48 , 12 C. C. A. 507 ; Minneapolis v. Lundin, 58 Fed. 525 , 7 C. C. A. 344 ; Porter v. Silver Creek, etc., Coal Co., 84 Wis. 418, 423 , 54 N. W. 1019 ; Colo. Coal & Iron Co. v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.