Case law

Exchange National Co. v. City of Shawnee

172 Okla. 574 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1935

OSBORN, V. C. J. … See, also, Independent School District No. 39 of Creek County v. Exchange National Company, 164 Okla. 176 , 23 P. (2d) 210 ; Board of Trustees of Incorporated Town of Broken Bow v. Fishman Realty & Inv.

Graham v. Childers

114 Okla. 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1925

Federation v. Salt Lake County (Utah) 61 Pac. 222 ; New Orleans v. Clark, 24 L. Ed. (U. S.) 521; Guilford v. Cornell, 18 Barb. (N. Y.) 615; Lycoming v. Union, , 15 Pa. St. 166; People v. … See, also, Cayuga Conty v. State, 183 N. Y. Supp. 646 ; Oswego & Syracuse R. R. Co. v. State, 226 N. Y. 351 ; Ulster v. State (N. Y.) 69 N. E. 370 .

Marley v. Cannon

618 P.2d 401 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1980

Boydston v. State, Okl., 277 P.2d 138 (1954); Adams v. Professional Practices Commission, Okl., 524 P.2d 932 (1974). In Board of Examiners in Veterinary Medicine v. … Sanders v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission, 200 Okl. 366 , 195 P.2d 272 (1948); Speaker v. Board of County Commissioners, Okl., 312 P.2d 438 (1957); Hughes v.

School District No. 60 of Ellis County v. Crabtree

146 Okla. 197 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 11, 1930

There is some conflict in the evidence as to the purpose of that meeting, the date on which it was held, and whether or not it conformed to the rule stated in Board of Ed. of Town of Carney v. … LESTER, V. C. J., and HUNT and RILEY, JJ., absent.

Rice v. State Ex Rel. Short

108 Okla. 4 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1924

Cook et al. v. United States, 91 U. S. 389 , 23 L. Ed. 237 ; United States v. Bostwick, 94 U. S. 53 , 24 L. Ed. 65 ; United States v. Commercial Co., 74 Fed. 145 ; see, also, Fretz v. … Ass’n v.

Garr v. Minnick

100 Okla. 109 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 1924

McAlester v. Williams, 77 Okla. 65 , 186 Pac. 461 ; Sierzek et al. v. Smith et al., 86 Okla. 797 , 202 Pac. 611 ; Beaty v. Armstrong, 95 Okla. 109 , 218 Pac. 516 . … J. 595, section 615; Brown v. Coppedge 54 Okla. 88 , 153 Pac. 817 : Levin v. Cook, 84 Okla. 55 , 202 Pac. 299 . 3.

Oliver v. Pickett, Co.

79 Okla. 315 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 1, 1920

Burns v. … Owen v. Tulsa, 27 Okla. 264 , 111 Pac. 320 ; Lackey et al. v. Grant et al., 29 Okla. 255 , 116 Pac. 913 ; Mitchell v. Carter, 31 Okla. 592 , 122 Pac. 691 ; Oklahoma Ry. Co. v.

Isom v. State

646 P.2d 1288 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 10, 1982

The appellant cites Lovell v. State, 455 P.2d 735 (Okl.Cr.1969) and Harris v. … There is ample evidence to support a finding that the appellant was driving while intoxicated at the time of the accident. *1293 The appellant argues that Brown v. State, 584 P.2d 231 (Okl.Cr.1978) and Winter v.

Bowen v. Brock

206 Okla. 516 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1952

In the motion request is made that the court take notice of its files and records in district court Case No. 19326, being entitled, The State of Oklahoma, Plaintiff, v. Mrs. Curtis Thompson, President, J. W. … Bynum v. Strain, 95 Okla. 45 , 218 P. 883 ; Wentz v. Thomas, 159 Okla. 124 , 15 P. 2d 65 .

George L. Verity Management Development Corp. v. Keyes

63 O.B.A.J. 1924 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1992

On the third Monday of September (the date the Board was to have ended its session according to 68 O.S.Supp.1985, § 2459) 1 there were still several thousand protests the Board had not been able to consider. … The authority of the Equalization Board, after its statutory adjournment date, to adjust and equalize assessments pursuant to timely filed protests, is affirmatively established by our opinion in Castro v.

Mann v. State

59 O.B.A.J. 76 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 5, 1988

See Franks v. Alford, 820 F.2d 345 (10th Cir.1987). The jury was properly and adequately instructed. See Seegars v. State, 655 P.2d 563 (Okl.Cr.1983); Wilson v. State, 649 P.2d 784 (Okl.Cr.1982); Johnson v. … See Stouffer v. State, 742 P.2d 562 (Okl.Cr.1987) (opinion on rehearing). There was testimony that he knew when he was at the Brown’s house that he would be killed.

Leake v. Jones

18 F.R.D. 80 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1955

Faced with that situation, the board of directors of the corporation, consisting of the taxpayer, Marjory Griffin Leake, James C. … Commissioner, 8 Cir., 76 F.2d 472 , certiorari denied Randolph v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 599 , 56 S.Ct. 116 , 80 L.Ed. 425 ; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Champion, 6 Cir., 78 F.2d 513 ; Brown v.

Edwards v. School District No. 222

117 Okla. 269 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1925

In the case of Ray v. … In the case of Fairbanks-Morse Co. v.

Phenis v. State

28 Okla. Crim. 142 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1924

Bennett v. State, 21 Okla. Cr. 27 , 204 Pac. 462 ; Douglas v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 648 , 179 Pac. 947 ; Williams v. Ter., 13 Ariz. 27 , 108 Pac. 243 , 27 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1032. … Taylor v. Ter., 2 Okla. Cr. 1 , 99 Pac. 628 ; Fuller v. Ter., 2 Okla. Cr. 86 , 99 Pac. 1098 ; Helsey v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 98 , 193 Pac. 50 , 17 A. L. R. 197; State v. Miller, 47 Or. 562 , 85 Pac. 81 , 6 L. R. A. (N.

Ex Parte Garland Brown

6 Okla. Crim. 134 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1911

In the case of Wychoff v. … See, also, Evans v. State, infra, 116 Pac. 356 ; Kester v. State, infra, 116 Pac. 356 ; Meek v. State, infra, 116 Pac. 356 .

Silver Griddle Co. v. City of Oklahoma City

570 P.2d 619 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 26, 1977

Martin v. Harrah Independent School District, supra; Melton v. City of Durant, supra. … Lincoln Income Life Insurance Co. v. Wood, 556 P.2d 602 (Okl.1976); Martin v. Harrah Independent School District, supra.

THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF OKLAHOMA v. ZIRIAX

463 P.3d 524 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 2020

TYREE Discussed 2009 OK 9 , 204 P.3d 58 , IN THE MATTER OF REINSTATEMENT OF PACENZA Discussed 2014 OK 8 , 319 P.3d 674 , GENTGES v. OKLAHOMA STATE ELECTION BOARD Discussed 2018 OK 39 , 419 P.3d 224 , GENTGES v. … OKLAHOMA STATE ELECTION BOARD Discussed 2019 OK 6 , 441 P.3d 1094 , MCINTOSH v. WATKINS Discussed 2019 OK 83 , VIDEO GAMING TECHNOLOGIES v. ROGERS COUNTY BD. OF TAX ROLL CORRECTIONS Cited Title 12.

Opinion No. (2007)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 12, 2007

V. … Id .; Marley v. Cannon , 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980).

Schaff, Rec. v. Borum, Co. Treas.

82 Okla. 284 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1921

Co. v. Scammon (Kan.) 25 Pac. 858 ; B. & M. R. Co. v. Board County Commissioners (Neb.) 11 N. W. 332 ; Wells Co. v. McHenry (N. D.) 74 N. W. Rep. 241 . … Co. v. Lane, 69 Oklahoma, 170 Pac. 502 . We believe that the rule announced in the case of Lusk et al. v. White, and Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v.

In re Protest of Taxpayers of Nichols Hills

198 Okla. 500 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1947

This is a direct appeal from the order of the board, and the cases discussed in the briefs, chief among which *501 is Blake et al. v. … Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. State, 174 Okla. 109 , 50 P. 2d 150 .