Case law

Baldwin v. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp.

3 S.W.3d 1 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 18, 1999

BROWN, individually and ) Appellate Court Clerk on behalf of a class of individuals ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs/Appellants, … Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386 (1987). In Belknap, Inc. v.

Sparkman v. State

469 S.W.2d 692 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 12, 1970

Gulley v. State, 219 Tenn. 114 , 407 S.W.2d 186 ; Jamison v. State, 220 Tenn. 280 , 416 S.W.2d 768 ; Webster v. State, Tenn.Crim.App., 425 S.W.2d 799 ; Brown v. State, Tenn.Crim.App., 441 S.W.2d 485 . … Thomas v. State, supra; Lester v. State, supra.

Michael D. Williams v. George M. Little

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 13, 2011

A reviewing court may grant relief only when the board or agency has exceeded its jurisdiction or acted illegally, arbitrarily, or fraudulently. Tenn. Code Ann. § 27-8-101; McCallen v. … TDOC Policy No. 502.01(V); see Willis v. Tenn. Dep’t of Corr., 113 S.W.3d 706, 713 (Tenn. 2003). In other words, the departure from the UDP must “effectively deny the prisoner a fair hearing.” Jeffries v. Tenn.

State v. Norvell

137 Tenn. 82 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1916

Washington v. Mayor of Nashville, 31 Tenn. (1 Swan.), 180; Wright v. State, 50 Tenn. (3 Heisk.), 256; House v. Whitis, 64 Tenn. (5 Bax.), 692; Theilan v. Porter, 82 Tenn. (14 Lea), 622, 52 Am. Rep., 173 ; Henley v. … A., 126; Webster v. State, 110 Tenn., 491 , 82 S. W., 179 ; Morrison v. State, 116 Tenn., 534 , 95 S. W., 494 ; Motlow v. State, 125 Tenn., 547 , 145 S. W., 177 .

St. Paul Community Limited Partnership v. St. Paul Community Church v. St. Paul Community Limited Partnership

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 31, 2018

The Church would have to agree to the requirement, and its board of elders was reluctant to agree to the provision. … Estate of Brown, 402 S.W.3d 193, 198 (Tenn. 2013) (citing Hughes v. New Life Dev. Corp., 387 S.W.3d 453, 471 (Tenn. 2012)). 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015).

State v. Kidd

534 S.W.2d 309 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1976

Adverse interest of board members and justices prohibited. — No member of the local board of education or of the quarterly county court shall take or make, as the adverse party, any contract which his board is competent to … Boles v.

Richards v. Abbottsford Homeowners Ass'n

809 S.W.2d 193 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 28, 1990

See Covenant for Maintenance Assessments, Article V, Section 7. The record reveals little concerning the manner in which the board of directors has used its authority to set Abbottsford’s maintenance fees. … Article V, Section 7 of the declaration of covenants gives the board of directors of the homeowners’ association broad authority to set the amount and manner of payment of Abbottsford’s maintenance fees.

Jimenez, Noe v. Orlando Arauz

2023 TN WC 69 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 28, 2023

. § 20-16-101 (2022); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 8.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Mr. Arauz meets this burden, Mr. … See the Rules governing the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board on the Bureau’s website If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s Order will become final by operation of law thirty

Gentry v. Gentry

924 S.W.2d 678 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1996

In the case of Brown v. … As stated in Brown, A distinction must be made in this regard between the mere erroneous exercise of a power granted, and the usurpation of a power where none exists. Id. 281 S.W.2d at 499. In Turner v.

State Ex Rel. Cope v. Davidson County

198 Tenn. 24 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1955

Davidson County Board of Education. … This Court very recently had the question before it in Board of Commissioners of Union City v. Obion County, 188 Tenn. 666 , 222 S. W. (2d) 7, 8 .

Dickens v. Tennessee Electric Power Co.

175 Tenn. 654 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1940

Brown on Frauds, see.* 282. . . . … East Tennessee, V. & G. Railroad Company v. Staub, 75 Tenn. (7 Lea), 397.

In Re Regions Morgan Keegan Sec., Derivative, Erisa Lit.

742 F. Supp. 2d 917 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 24, 2010

Because Plaintiffs may not simultaneously plead that they made demand on the board and that demand is excused, Plaintiffs’ demand futility arguments are MOOT. See Bender v. … See McCall v. Scott, 239 F.3d 808, 815 (6th Cir.2001).

The River Oak, GP v. IOAN Bucse

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 25, 2016

Candy Lane abuts the eastern boundary of both the River Oaks property and the Bucse property.1 River Oaks is a partnership consisting of Conoly Brown (―Mr. Brown‖) and David Hood (―Mr. Hood‖). Mr. Brown and Mr. … Brown was a tenant as early as January 2003.

In Re Estate of Price

273 S.W.3d 113 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 24, 2008

Brown v. Weik, 725 S.W.2d 938, 945 (Tenn.Ct.App.1983). In Iacometti v. … Wyatt v. Brown, 39 Tenn.App. 28 , 281 S.W.2d 64, 68 (1955). Because there was no written partnership agreement between Mr. Fen-ner and Mr.

Jones, Anthony v. Trojan Labor of Nashville, LLC

2016 TN WC 82 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 13, 2016

See Silas v. Brock Services, No. 2014-02-0013, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. 35, at *9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Oct. 2, 2015). Mr. … See Silas v. Brock Services, No. 2014-02-0013, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 35, at *11-12 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.

State National Bank v. City of Memphis

116 Tenn. 641 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1906

School, etc., 42 Pa., 21 ; Louisville v. Comw., 61 Ky., 63 ; E. & W. Const. Co. v. Jasper Co., 117 Iowa, 365, 372 , 90 N. W., 1006 , 94 Am. St. Rep., 301 , and authorities cited in note to Board of Com’rs v. … (State v. Board of Assessors, p. 651), such was the rule laid down in Louisiana. Morrison v. Larkin, 26 La. Ann., 699 ; Lefranc v. City of New Orleans, 27 La. Ann., 188 ; City of N. C. v. Bank of Lafayette, 27 La.

Davis, Mary v. ELVIS PRESLEY ENTERPRISES, INC.

2025 TN WC 3 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 6, 2025

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2024); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Miles, DeAndre v. Nike Inc. Footwear

2025 TN WC App. 46 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 16, 2025

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD DeAndre Miles Docket No. 2023-08-8556 v. … Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010).

State of Tennessee v. Amilcar Crabeal Butler

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 14, 2016

On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the trial court’s dismissal was improper because the trial court relied on State v. Brown, 479 S.W.3d 200 (Tenn. 2015), which the Petitioner argues was wrongly decided. … Brown does not allow a petitioner to seek relief for an expired sentence under Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1. See Brown, 479 S.W.3d at 211.

Harry McLemore, Jr. v. Charles Traughber, Tennessee Boards of Probation and Paroles

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 28, 2007

App. 1999) (citing Powell v. Parole Eligibility Review Bd., 879 S.W.2d 871 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994)). However, “[t]he intrinsic correctness of the Board’s decision is not reviewable under the writ.” Id. (citing Arnold v. … Daugherty v. Tennessee Bd. of Probation and Parole, No. M2003-02429-COA-R3-CV, 2005 WL 229866, at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 28, 2005) (citing Arnold v. Board of Paroles, 956 S.W.2d 478, 482 (Tenn. 1997)).