Opinion

Jimenez, Noe v. Orlando Arauz

  • 2023 TN WC 69
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Sep 28, 2023
Status
Published
On the bench
Dale Tipps
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Sep 28, 2023

10:10 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MURFREESBORO

NOE JIMENEZ, ) Docket No. 2021-05-1163

Employee, )

Vv. )

)

ORLANDO ARAUZ, ) State File No. 30028-2020

Employer, )

And )

)

TECHNOLOGY CoO., INC., ) Judge Dale Tipps

Carrier. )

COMPENSATION ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Mr. Arauz filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. The central issue is whether he

is entitled to summary judgment because the statute of limitations bars Mr. Jimenez’s

claim. For the reasons below, the Court holds Mr. Arauz is entitled to summary judgment.

Procedural History and Facts

Mr. Jimenez alleged he suffered work-related injuries on April 16, 2020. Mr. Arauz

accepted the claim and provided medical treatment. Mr. Jimenez filed a Petition for Benefit

Determination on December 22, 2023, seeking additional treatment.

Mr. Arauz filed this Motion for Summary Judgment, and Mr. Jimenez filed no

response. The Court held a hearing on the motion on September 26, 2023, but Mr. Jimenez

did not appear.

Mr. Arauz filed a statement of undisputed material facts with citations to the record

under Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure 56.03. Because Mr. Jimenez did not respond,

no facts alleged in Mr. Arauz’s statement were rebutted. These facts are summarized as

follows:

1. Mr. Jimenez’s date of injury is April 16, 2020.

2. The last date Mr. Arauz paid benefits to or on behalf of Mr. Jimenez was November

2, 2020.

3. Mr. Jimenez filed his Petition for Benefit Determination on December 22, 2021.

Based on these facts, Mr. Arauz argued summary judgment should be granted

because it affirmatively negated an essential element of Mr. Jimenez’s claim — that he

timely filed the petition — and that the facts are insufficient for him to prove this element.

Law and Analysis

Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to

interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there

is No genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment

as a matter of law.” Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.04.

As the moving party, Mr. Arauz must do one of two things to prevail on his motion:

(1) submit affirmative evidence that negates an essential element of Mr. Jimenez’s claim,

or (2) demonstrate that his evidence is insufficient to establish an essential element of his

claim. Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2022); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of

Memphis, MPLLC, 477 8.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Mr. Arauz meets this burden,

Mr. Jimenez must then establish that the record contains specific facts upon which the

Court could base a decision in his favor. Rye, at 265.

Mr. Jimenez did not respond in writing to oppose Mr. Arauz’s properly supported

motion for summary judgment or follow the Rule 56 requirement of responding to the

statement of undisputed material facts. Therefore, the Court finds the motion and the facts

are undisputed. The issue then is whether under Rule 56.06 summary judgment is

“appropriate.”

The essential element at issue in this case comes from Tennessee Code Annotated

section 50-6-203(b)(2), which provides that when the employer has voluntarily paid

workers’ compensation benefits, the right to compensation is forever barred unless a

petition for benefit determination is filed “within one year from the latter of the date of the

last authorized treatment or the time the employer ceased to make payments of

compensation to or on behalf of the employee.”

The undisputed facts conclusively show that Mr. Jimenez filed his Petition for

Benefit Determination on December 22, 2021, which is more than one year after Mr.

Arauz’s last payment of authorized benefits on November 2, 2020. Thus, Mr. Arauz met

his burden of negating an essential element of the claim. This means Mr. Jimenez must

show that the record contains specific facts upon which the Court could find in his favor,

such as proof of a recognized exception to the statute of limitations.

2

As noted above, Mr. Jimenez filed no response to the motion or the statement of

undisputed material facts. Without proof of any applicable exceptions to the statute of

limitations, Mr. Jimenez’s evidence is insufficient to prove this essential element of his

claim. Therefore, the Court holds that no genuine issue of material fact exists and Mr.

Arauz is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Mr. Arauz’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and Mr. Jimenez’s claim is

dismissed with prejudice to its refiling.

2. Unless appealed, this order shall become final thirty days after entry.

3. The Court taxes the $150.00 filing fee to Mr. Arauz under Tennessee Compilation

Rules and Regulations 0800-02-21-.06, payable to the Clerk within five business

days.

4. Mr. Arauz shall prepare and submit the SD-2 with the Clerk within ten days of the

date of judgment.

ENTERED September 28, 2023.

(FEET

Judge Dale Tipps

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Order was sent as indicated on September 28, 2023.

Name U.S. Mail | Via Service Sent To

Email

Noe Jimenez x x 813 Naylor Ave., lot 38

Murfreesboro, TN 37130

jimennoah@gmail.com

Mackenzie Keffalos, xX mckeffalos@mijs.com

Employer’s Attorney

Parng OM lin

Penny Shrum, Clerk of Court

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

Compensation Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Compensation Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board. To do so, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within thirty calendar days of the date the

Compensation Order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy

upon the opposing party (or attorney, if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar

days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office

or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an

Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office)

seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency

within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing

fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. The Court Clerk

will prepare the technical record and exhibits for submission to the Appeals Board, and you

will receive notice once it has been submitted. If no court reporter was present at the hearing,

you may request from the Court Clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee.

A licensed court reporter must prepare a transcript, and you must file it with the Court Clerk

within fifteen calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a

statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both parties within fifteen calendar days of

filing the Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and

accurate account of the testimony presented at the hearing. The Workers’ Compensation

Judge must approve the statement of the evidence before the record is submitted to the

Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board must review testimony or other proof concerning

factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be a significant

obstacle to meaningful appellate review.

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties. You have fifteen

calendar days after the date of that notice to file a brief to the Appeals Board. See the Rules

governing the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board on the Bureau’s website

If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s Order will

become final by operation of law thirty calendar days after entry. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-

239(c)(7).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

220 French Landing Drive, I-B

Nashville, TN 37243-1002

800-332-2667

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY

I, , having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that

because of my poverty, | am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be

waived. The following facts support my poverty.

1. Full Name: 2. Address:

3. Telephone Number: 4. Date of Birth:

5. Names and Ages of All Dependents:

Relationship:

Relationship:

Relationship:

Relationship:

6. |am employed by:

My employer’s address is:

My employer's phone number is:

7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:

$

8. | receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:

AFDC $ per month beginning

ssl $ per month beginning

Retirement $ per month beginning

Disability $ per month beginning

Unemployment $ per month beginning

Worker's Comp.$ per month beginning

Other $ per month beginning

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

9. My expenses are:

Rent/House Payment $ permonth Medical/Dental $ per month

Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month

Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month

Water $ per month Clothing $ per month

Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month

Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month

Car $ per month

Other $ per month (describe: )

10. Assets:

Automobile $ (FMV)

Checking/Savings Acct. $

House $ _ (FMV)

Other $ Describe:

11. My debts are:

Amount Owed To Whom

| hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete

and that I am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.

APPELLANT

Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this

day of , 20

NOTARY PUBLIC

My Commission Expires:

LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.