Case law

Schlosser v. Clackamas Water District

60 Or. App. 617 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 1982

Foster v. Schnell Refrigeration Co., 280 Or 411, 414 , 571 P2d 497 (1977). In early October, 1980, the Board of Directors of defendant (District) authorized the sale of a lot and building on St. Helens Road. … The letter gave notice that the Board would not entertain a bid less than $160,000. The letter contains no words of promise, commitment or undertaking, Southworth v.

Thomas v. State Accident Insurance Fund

8 Or. App. 414 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 16, 1972

State v. Krause, 251 Or 318 , 445 P2d 500 (1968). Highway Commission v. Helliwell, 225 Or 588 , 358 P2d 719 (1961), Senger v. Vancouver-Portland Bus Co., 209 Or 37 , 298 P2d 835 , 304 P2d 448 (1956).” State v. … Huard v. McTeigh, 113 Or 279 , 232 P 658 , 39 ALR528 (1925). ② Common-law marriages are likewise not valid in California. Norman v.

OR-OSHA v. Loy Clark Pipeline, Co.

320 Or. App. 205 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 8, 2022

See State v. … Id.; see also Murphy v. Oregon Medical Board, 270 Or App 621, 631, 348 P3d 1173 (2015) (notice did not provide adequate notice of statutory bases for discipline); Villanueva v.

State v. Lee Chue

130 Or. 99 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 8, 1929

The board functions as a state board, and the members of it are state officers; and we take judicial notice, not only of the existence of such board, but of the accession to office and the duration of the term of each of … Patterson: Butts v. Purdy, 63 Or. 150, 164 ( 125 Pac. 313 ). *105 Counsel for defendant cite United States v. Williams, 5 Cranch C. C. 62, 28 Fed. Cas. (No. 16,713) 660, but that case is not in point here.

Morgan v. Stimson Lumber Co.

289 Or. 93 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 6, 1980

The Cotut of Appeals reversed, holding that the Workers’ Compensation Law "does not give the Board the authority to assess penalties for failure to provide claimant with requested documents.” Morgan v. … We reversed the Cotut of Appeals, Morgan v. Stimson Lumber Company, 288 Or 595 , 607 P2d 150 (1980). Our mandate took the form of a simple reversal of the Court of Appeals, thus affirming the order of the Board.

Ayers v. Lincoln County School District

248 Or. 31 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1967

School Dist. 7 v. Weissenfluh, 236 Or 165 , 387 P2d 567 (1963); Mohr v. State Board of Education, 236 Or 398 , 388 P2d 463 (1964). … Mohr v. State Board of Education, supra. Defendant contends that the panel proceedings are *36 “investigatory” only, and because of that plaintiff may not complain over her exclusion.

Stark v. McKenna

124 Or. 332 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1928

He cannot accept the benefits of the transaction and repudiate the parts thereof disadvantageous to him: Dillard v. Olalla, 52 Or. 126 ( 94 Pac. 966 , 96 Pac. 678 ); Rae v. … J., and McBride and Brown, JJ., concur.'

Brewer v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

59 Or. App. 87 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 8, 1982

Hutcheson v. Weyerhaeuser, 288 Or 51, 55 , 602 P2d 268 (1979). De novo review of the record satisfies us that claimant has met that burden of proof with regard to the worsening of her right wrist condition. … The Board affirmed and we affirm the Board on that issue.

State v. Hunt

119 Or. App. 452 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 21, 1993

State v. Hammang, 271 Or 749, 756 , 534 P2d 501 (1975), purported to overrule State v. Brown, supra. In State v. Farley, supra, 301 Or at 674 , the court held that it had erred in overruling Brown in Hammang . … We have since cited and relied on the rule in Brown without further discussion. See, e.g., State v. Schaffran, 95 Or App 329, 332 , 769 P2d 230 (1989).

State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. Adams

248 Or. 269 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1967

State v. Walker, 244 Or 404, 412, 413 , 417 P2d 1004 (1966); NW Ice and, Cold Stor. v. Multnomah Co., 228 Or 507, 512 , 365 P2d 876 (1961); Larson v. Heintz Const. … In McGinnis et al v.

Topolic v. Saif Corp.

122 Or. App. 94 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 28, 1993

Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp., supra, 309 Or at 296 . … Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp., supra, 309 Or at 294 . Claimant next assigns error to the Board’s finding that he is not PTD.

Greenwood v. Gladden

231 Or. 396 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1962

Petitioner contends, however, that the statute is in direct conflict with the holding in Anderson v. … The legislature can constitutionally delegate to the parole board the authority to decide whether the conditions of the parole are fulfilled. Cf., Rightnour v. Gladden, 219 Or 342 , 347 P2d 103 (1959).

Tye v. McFetridge

199 Or. App. 529 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 2005

In its opinion in this case, the board undertook to follow our decisions in SAIF v. Frias, 169 Or App 345 , 8 P3d 1005 (2000) and Garcia v. SAIF, 194 Or App 504 , 95 P3d 1166 (2004). … Stull v.

In Re Estate of MacMullen

117 Or. 505 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1926

C. 317; Nave v. Salmon, 51 Ind. 159 ; Knight v. Hamakar, 40 Or. 424, 431 ( 67 Pac. 107 ); In re Ross’ Estate, 179 Cal. 358 ( 182 Pac. 303 ); In re Snowball Estate, 156 Cal. 235 ( 104 Pac. 446 ). … A similar holding was announced in Ford v. Gilbert, 44 Or. 259, 262 ( 75 Pac. 138 ).

Petersburg Education Ass'n v. Petersburg School District No. 14

23 Or. App. 482 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 1975

Tupper v. Fairview Hospital, 22 Or App 523 , 540 P2d 401 (1975); Schlichting v. Bergstrom, 13 Or App 562 , 511 P2d 846 (1973). … . * * * [T~\he jurisdiction of the Board [is] limited to whether or not the discharges, were for union activities or affiliations of the employees.” National Labor Relations Bd. v.

Saif Corp. v. Schiller

151 Or. App. 58 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 1997

Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp., 309 Or 292, 295 , 787 P2d 884 (1990); Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 206 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). … Yokum, 132 Or App 18, 22 , 887 P2d 380 (1994) (court concluded implicitly that it has jurisdiction over only those issues preserved before the Board); McCarter v.

Trujillo v. Pacific Safety Supply

336 Or. 349 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 29, 2004

On January 20, 2000, in a brief order on review, the board affirmed. 8 C. Mount v. … For that reason, we affirm the board’s orders in Logsdon v. SAIF and Mount v. DCBS, and we affirm the decisions of the Court of Appeals in those cases. We also affirm the Court of Appeals decision in Trujillo v.

Ernst v. United States

293 F. Supp. 3d 1242 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 13, 2017

See Hart v. … When the potential lender asked about collateral, the defendant explained where Brown would get the money to repay the loan and also stated that Brown and the lender could go to San Francisco to get cocaine as a "further

Oregon Home Builders v. Crowley

87 Or. 517 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1918

*525 Warlters: Browne on St. of Fr. (5 ed.), §§ 391, 393; 20 Cyc. 262. … Co. v. Schnell, 20 Minn. 40, 45 ; 20 Cyc. 266; 3 Jones on Ev., § 430, p. 130; Browne on Statute of Frauds (5 ed.), § 399.

Stevenson v. Blue Cross

108 Or. App. 247 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 24, 1991

Dethlefs v. Hyster Co., 295 Or 298, 310 , 667 P2d 487 (1983). Claimant also assigns as error that the Board concluded that SAIF had not accepted her claim for tendonitis. She argues that, under Bowman, v. … Georgia-Pacific v. Piwowar, 305 Or 494, 500 , 753 P2d 948 (1988); see also Johnson v. Spectra Physics, 303 Or 49, *252 56 , 733 P2d 1367 (1987).