Case law

Seba v. Independent School Dist. No. 3

208 Okla. 83 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1953

We held in Fischer v. … No showing was made in the case at bar that the school board did not need this property or that it did not have the right to take it by eminent domain. In Wilkerson v.

State Ex Rel. Hembree v. County Court of Cleveland County

189 Okla. 383 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1941

Walker, 168 Okla. 543 , 35 P. 2d 269 ; Equalization Board v. Ford Motor Co., 177 Okla. 583 , 61 P. 2d 251 ; Higgins v. Brown, 20 Okla. 355 , 94 P. 703 ; Board of County Com’rs of Seminole County v. … See, also, Miller v. Tidal Oil Co., 130 Okla. 133 , 265 P. 648 ; Kersey v. McDougal, 79 Okla. 53 , 191 P. 594 ; Haddock v. Bronaugh, 92 Okla. 197 , 218 P. 848 ; and in Jackson v.

Franklin v. Ryan

125 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 17, 1927

Payne v. Ross, 95 Okla. 273 , 219 Pac. 144 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. … This court, in the case of Schaff, Receiver, v. Borum, County Treasurer, 82 Okla. 284 , 200 Pac. 191 , and Simmons v.

Opinion No. (2011)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 2011

Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). Moreover, legislative intent must be determined from the entire act. In re Blain , 172 P.2d 795 , 799 (Okla. 1946). … Boards), between a non state agency board and a state agency (the Eastern Red Cedar Registry Board and the Board of Agriculture) and between two state agencies (the Pet Breeders Board and the Veterinary Board).

Wilson v. Wilson

738 P.2d 1382 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1987

Huchteman, supra; Brown v. Brown, 607 P.2d 1358 (Okl.1980). … Brown, supra. With regard to child support, the court may consider the relative earning capacities of the parties or change thereof in making its determination *1384 of modification. DeGraffenreid v.

Opinion No. (2011)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 2011

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals has specifically held that the Pardon and Parole Board's recommendation is advisory only and not binding on the Governor. Jerry, Jr. v. … In Wright v. Page , 414 P.2d 570 , 573 (Okla. Crim. App. 1966), the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals specifically held that the Pardon and Parole Board cannot grant a parole on its own action.

In Re First State Bank of Oklahoma City

68 Okla. 88 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 29, 1918

Noble State Bank v. Haskell, 22 Okla. 48 , 97 Pac. 590 ; Id., 219 U. S. 104 , 31 Sup. Ct. 186, 55 L. Ed. 112 , 32 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1062, Ann. Cas. 1912A, 487; Lankford v. Platte Iron Works, 235 U. S. 461 , 35 Sup. … Noble State Bank v. Haskell, supra; In re Assessment First National Bank, supra.

State Ex Rel. Short v. Riedell

109 Okla. 35 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 1924

In Lehmann v. … Co. v.

Roberts v. South Oklahoma City Hospital Trust

742 P.2d 1077 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 1986

In Hammons v. … See Hammons v. Muskogee Medical Center Authority, note 6, supra. . Jarvis v. City of Stillwater, 669 P.2d 1108, 1111 (Okla.1983). . Hershel v. University Hosp. Found., 610 P.2d 237, 240-42 (Okla.1980). .

CATHEY v. BD. OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR McCURTAIN COUNTY

550 P.3d 910 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 2024

.]; Smith v. … BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR MCCURTAIN COUNTY Cited 1999 OK 50, 984 P.2d 194, 70 OBJ 1809, Osprey L.L.C. v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co. Cited 1985 OK 15, 695 P.2d 1352, Cate v. Archon Oil Co., Inc.

Powers v. Van Dyke

27 Okla. 27 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1910

Brown, plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, sued B. F. Van Dyke, Rose Monlinari, and James A. … In Den v. Geiger, 9 N. J.

Ballard v. Independent School District No. 4 of Bryan County

74 O.B.A.J. 2574 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 2003

Bancroft v. … Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists of Oklahoma, 1949 OK 216 , 210 P.2d 666 . . House v. Independent School District I-29 of Muskogee County, 1997 OK 35 , 939 P.2d 1127 . . State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v.

Independent School Dist. No. 65 v. Stafford

208 Okla. 542 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1953

The argument is that since plaintiff was a teacher, suing to recover her salary, but without showing compliance with the loyalty oath statute, supra, the case falls within the rule announced in Board of Regents, etc., v. … Sharpless Separator Co. v. Gray, 62 Okla. 73 , 161 P. 1074 ; Farmers’ Co-Op. Ass’n v. Shaw, 171 Okla. 358 , 42 P. 2d 887 ; Ray v. Board of Education of Pond Creek, 194 Okla. 472 , 153 P. 2d 233 .

Rogers v. State

85 Okla. Crim. 116 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 15, 1947

In Hart v. State, 57 Okla. … In the case of Hopper v. State, 81 Okla.

Hefner v. Cravens

189 Okla. 558 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1941

In Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. Sutton, 185 Okla. 665 , 95 P. 2d 648 , this court considered the rule followed by such cases as Dixon v. Bowlegs, supra, as well as section 1.2628, supra. … Therefore, we think that as a matter of practical justice, the rule enunciated in Board of Com’rs of Tulsa Co. v. Sutton, supra, should be applied in all proper cases.

In Re Pierce's Appeal

347 P.2d 790 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1959

In this connection, see City of Idaho Falls v. Grimmett, 63 Idaho 90 , 117 P.2d 461 , citing McCurley v. City of El Reno, 138 Okl. 92 , 280 P. 467, 472 , and other cases. … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and JOHNSON, JACKSON, IRWIN and BERRY, JJ., concur. WELCH, J., dissents.

Randolph v. State Ex Rel. Awtrey

169 Okla. 440 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1934

Mitchell v. Shawnee, 167 Okla. 582 , 31 P. (2d) 552 . No one can invoke the benefit of a penal statute without bringing himself within its terms. Simmons v. American Ry. Express (Ark.) 227 S. W. 414 ; Osborne v. Int. R. … Schilling v. Oklahoma City, 67 Okla. 18 , 168 P. 227 . A party is not made a defendant by inserting the name of such party as a defendant in the caption of pleadings.

Shires v. WROUGHT IRON RANGE COMPANY

339 P.2d 105 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1959

Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Savage, 208 Okl. 668 , 258 P.2d 183 , the insurance carrier is liable for an award. -. Item No. 3 of the policy issued by insurer to employer names certain states specifically covered. … Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Savage, supra. Finally it is argued by the respondents that there are no dependents.

Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Latty

77 Okla. 156 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 6, 1920

In the case of Bass v. Concord St. Ry. … Co. v.

London v. Day

38 Okla. 428 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1913

See Williams v. Garfield Exchange Bank, post, 134 Pac. 863 ; Rumph, Treasurer, v. … Guarantee State Bank et al., 27 Okla. 736 , 117 Pac. 216 ; Asher State Bank v. Board of Com’rs of Pottawatomie County, 31 Okla. 145 , 120 Pac. 634 .