Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.61s
Whitley's Electric Service, Inc. v. Walston
105 N.C. App. 609 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1992
Calloway v. Motor Co., 281 N.C. 496, 501 , 189 S.E.2d 484, 488 (1972). … State v. Duvall, 304 N.C. 557, 562 , 284 S.E.2d 495, 498 (1981).
Cited 5 timesPublished230 N.C. 345 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 1949
counsel for the prisoner were compelled to resort at random to the special veniremen and to bystanders in the courtroom at Windsor, eighty-two miles from the county seat of Warren County, to sustain the proposition that the Board … The declaration of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Brown v. Hummel, 6 Pa. State 86, 47 Am. Dec. 431 , is apposite.
Cited 40 timesPublished207 N.C. App. 527 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 2, 2010
Defendants George Brown, Julian M. … Brown, Sr., Julian M. Brown, Jr., George Ashley Brown, Earl McDonald Chadwick, Temple Strong Chadwick, Norman Leslie Fulcher, Joseph O.
Cited 15 timesPublished56 N.C. App. 291 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1982
Kilburn became Board Certified in Internal Medicine in 1963. … G.S. 97-52; Wood v. Stevens & Co., supra.
Cited 0 timesPublished384 F. Supp. 1390 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 16, 1974
In Cooper v. … Smith v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBouabid v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools Board of Education
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 6, 2020
M.E. v. Buncombe Cty. Bd. of Educ., 72 F. … Brown v. Mitchell, 327 F. Supp. 2d 615, 628 (E.D. Va. 2004). It is well established that a claim under section 1983 may not be based on a violation of the IDEA. Sellers, 141 F.3d at 529.
Cited 0 timesUnknownN.C. Democratic Party v. Berger
306 F. Supp. 3d 803 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 31, 2018
Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 730, 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). The Constitution grants broad powers to the states to prescribe the time, place, and manner of elections for state offices. … For example, in New York State Board of Elections v.
Cited 0 timesPublished246 N.C. App. 227 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 2016
Id. at 672 n. 1, 666 S.E.2d at 157 n. 1.2 2010: Our Supreme Court Speaks Again in Brown v. … In 2016, though, our Court, in Alston, interpreted Brown much more narrowly than suggested by the Brown dissent.
Cited 5 timesPublished223 N.C. 650 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1943
And there is no allegation that the Board has acted capriciously or in bad faith. Pue v. Hood, Comr. of Banks, 222 N. C., 310 , 22 S. E. (2d), 896 ; Warren v. Maxwell, ante, 604. … See Schank v. Asheville, 154 N. C., 40 , 69 S. E., 681 ; Asheboro v. Miller, 220 N. C., 298, 17 S. E. (2d), 105 ; Warren v. Maxwell, supra.
Cited 3 timesPublishedK.I. v. DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 29, 2020
The Court’s reading of the statute’s requirements is supported by the Fourth Circuit’s treatment of the same statute in E.L. v. Chapel Hill-Carrboro Board of Education. … Learning Disabilities Ass’n of Md., Inc. v. Board of Educ. of Balt. Cty., 837 F. Supp. 717, 723 (D. Md. 1993).
Cited 0 timesUnknownJohnson v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools Board of Education
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jul 10, 2020
of City of Norfolk v. Brown, 769 F. Supp. 2d 928, 953 (E.D. Va. 2010). Such a claim is moot unless it is “capable of repetition, yet evading review.” Id. … App'x 769, 779 n.15 (4th Cir. 2018) (unpublished) (parent’s IDEA claims not moot where parent sought monetary relief in federal Complaint), and Brown v. Bartholomew Consol. Sch.
Cited 0 timesUnknown111 N.C. App. 244 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 20, 1993
Equitable Leasing Corp. v. Myers, 46 N.C.App. 162, 164 , 265 S.E.2d 240, 242 (1980). Basically, the right to appeal is available through two channels. Brown v. … Cunningham v. Brown, 51 N.C.App. 264, 267 , 276 S.E.2d 718, 722 (1981).
Cited 37 timesPublished271 N.C. 391 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1967
Brown’s house for his pay for hauling Booker T. Brown and Wig Clark to work. Booker T. Brown was not at home. In leaving for the gunsmith’s, he turned down Sycamore Street and saw Booker T. … Hanrahan v. Walgreen Co., 243 N.C. 268 , 90 S.E. 2d 392 .
Cited 7 timesPublished114 N.C. App. 742 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 17, 1994
Brown testified that her “clinical impression first was that the findings were strongly suggestive of possible sexual abuse.” In State v. Hammond, 112 N.C. … Brown for suspected sexual abuse. C.’s answer to Dr. Brown’s question, therefore, was for the purpose of and was pertinent to a proper diagnosis and course of treatment. See State v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 2, 2014
See Messer v. … See Poore v.
Cited 0 timesPublished114 N.C. App. 110 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1994
(Seal) Chairman, Board of Commissioners of . County (Mayor, City (or Town) of .) Attest: Clerk of Board of Commissioners of.County (Clerk of the City (or Town) of .) G.S. 105-321(b) (1992) (emphasis added). … App. 660, 665 , 230 S.E.2d 594, 597 (1976), disc. review denied, 291 N.C. 710 , 232 S.E.2d 202 (1977); Brown v. Guthery, 190 N.C. 822, 824 , 130 S.E. 836, 837 (1925).
Cited 5 timesPublished219 N.C. 96 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1941
Provision Co. v. Daves , 190 N.C. 7 . It was held in Meador v. … Jones v. North Wilkesboro , 150 N.C. 646 ; Hayes v. Benton , 193 N.C. 379 , and cases there cited.
Cited 9 timesPublished162 N.C. App. 386 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 3, 2004
State v. Carroll, 356 N.C. 526, 542 , 573 S.E.2d 899, 910 (2002). … Brown’s testimony reveals that it was admissible under the medical diagnosis exception to the rule against hearsay. InState v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedHartsell v. Mindpath Care Ctrs., N.C., Pllc
2022 NCBC 66 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 2, 2022
Barefoot v. Barefoot, 2022 NCBC LEXIS 8, at **9 (N.C. Super. Ct. Feb. 2, 2022) (citing Finley v. Brown, 2017 NCBC LEXIS 79, at **8 (N.C. Super. Ct. Sept. 1, 2017). … Rhodes v. Jones 232 N.C. 547, 549 (1950). Thus, the existence of a fiduciary relationship is an essential element of a constructive fraud claim. Brown v. Secor, 2017 NCBC LEXIS 65, at **18 (N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHiatt v. Burlington Industries, Inc.
55 N.C. App. 523 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1982
I received that paper work in a brown envelope. Later on I received that plaque that has been referred to. … In Williams v.
Cited 16 timesPublished
Ask Donna