Case law

Harold MacQuinn, INC v. Town of Mount Desert

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 12, 2018

See, e.g., Roop v. … Bank v.

State v. Bornstein

107 Me. 260 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 2, 1910

So in Webber v. Virginia, 103 U. … The question again arose in State v.

Esponette v. Wiseman

130 Me. 297 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 26, 1931

Fernald v. French, 121 Me., 4. … Davis v. Brown (Cal.), 267 Pac., 754 . We can not but be convinced that the jury entirely overlooked these various propositions, although they were clearly set out in the charge of the presiding Justice.

Bennett v. ROARK CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

738 F. Supp. 2d 157 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 16, 2010

At all relevant times, Susan Herzog was a member of the board of directors of WSI and vice-president of Roark Capital Group, Inc. (Compl. ¶ 40.) … As set out in Romano v.

MSR Recycling LLC v. Weeks and Hutchins, LLC

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 9, 2018

Lougee Conservancy v. … See id.; Town of Pownal v. Emerson, 639 A.2d 619, 620 (Me. 1994); Town of Mount Desert v. Smith, 2000 ME 88, 9I 3, 751 A.2d 445.

Bowman v. Pinkham

71 Me. 295 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 3, 1880

Burrough v. Philcox, 5 Mylne & Craig, 92. "Tbe principle of that case, Pierson v. Garnet, 2 Bro. C. C. 38; and of Richardson v. Chapman, 7 Bro. P. … Brown v. Higgs, 8 Vesey, Jr. 574.

Lawrence v. Richards

111 Me. 95 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 12, 1913

Bangor v. County Commissioners, 87 Maine, 294; Spelling on Extraordinary Remedies, sections 687, 1384. This principle is admitted in argument by the petitioner. … It is proper to say that the case of Robbins v.. Railway Co., ioo Maine, 496, on which the petitioner strongly relies, is easily distinguishable from this ¡case.

Peaks v. Hutchinson

59 L.R.A. 279 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 29, 1902

See also Wentworth v. Wentworth, 69 Maine, 247. It is true that in Haggett v. Hurley, 91 Maine, 542, 41 L. R. … Russell v. Richards, 10 Maine, 429, 25 Am. Dec. 254 ; Hilborne v. Brown, 12 Maine, 162, and Tapley v.

Burgess v. M/V Tamano

370 F. Supp. 247 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 27, 1973

Smedberg v. Mosie Dam Co., supra; Bouquet v. Hackensack Water Co., 90 N.J.L. 203 , 101 A. 379 (1917); Hohmann v. City of Chicago, 140 Ill. 226 , 29 N.E. 671 (1892); Prosser v. Ottumwa, 42 Iowa 509 (1876); Willard v. … Whitmore v. Brown, 102 Me. 47 , 65 A. 516 (1906).

The Rochambeau

20 F. Cas. 1064 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 19, 1864

B., shipped on board the American ship Roeh-ambeau, for a voyage to London and back, not to exceed nine months in time, at the rate of $25 per month, in the New Brunswick currency. … Tre-cartin v. The Rochambeau [Case No. 14,163]. The decree in the case ought to be for a sum in the United States currency that would make the payment equal to specie.

State of Maine v. Arnold A. Diana

89 A.3d 132 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 20, 2014

The officers saw, but did not seize, a pillow with a red-brown stain on a closet shelf. … State v.

Watson v. French

112 Me. 371 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 23, 1914

And the same element of visibility is recognized in the recent case of Brown v. … In Philbrick v.

Boutet v. Residents of the Town of Old Orchard Beach

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 19, 2016

Whiting v. Seavey, 159 Me. 61, 66 (1963). … See Bizier v. Town ofTurner, 2011 ME 116, ~ 8, 32 A.3d 1048; see also 517 Ocean House LLC v. Town ofCape Elizabeth, 2016 Me. Super. LEXIS 88, *3 (May 10, 2016) (citing Wells v.

NICKERSON-MALPHER v. Worley

560 F. Supp. 2d 75 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 17, 2008

State v. Malpher, 947 A.2d 484 (Me.2008). … Brown v. Osier, 628 A.2d 125, 129 (Me.1993) (italics in original). 5 .

Trask v. Public Utilities Commission

731 A.2d 430 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 22, 1999

An emergency meeting of the Board of Trustees of the District was held on March 29, 1998, at which the Board discussed and accepted Trask’s offer. … See, e.g., Great Hill Lake, Inc. v.

Sultan Corp. v. Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 30, 2021

Suzman v. Comm 'r, Dep 't ofHealth & Human Servs., 2005 ME 80,124, 876 A.2d 29. … See Cf Corinth Pellets, LLC v. Arch Specialty Ins.

Kidder v. Inhabitants of Knox

48 Me. 551 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1860

, testified, without objection, that “ he purchased the liquors named in said account annexed, in Boston, in his said capacity as one of the selectmen of Knox, under the direction and by the decree of a majority of said board … See Wilkins v. Reed, 6 Maine, 220, 2d ed., and note by editor, citing Butts v. Dean, 2 Met., 76 ; C urtis v. Hubberd, 9 Met., 328 , and Perrin v. Keene, 19 Maine, 355. Nonsuit taken off, and Case to stand for trial.

State v. Barnies

680 A.2d 449 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 25, 1996

In People v. Brown, 70 N.Y.2d 513 , 522 N.Y.S.2d 837 , 517 N.E.2d 515 (1987), the New York Court of Appeals considered the question of the effect of a police officer’s direct inquiry on a statement’s reliability. … In State v.

Connor v. Inhabitants of Southport

136 Me. 447 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 9, 1940

Browne, inhabitants of the town of Southport in our County of Lincoln, and pursuant to the provisions of R. … Taylor v. Caribou, 102 Me., 401 at 405, 67 A., 2 . For, as said by Emery, J., in Cummings et al. v.

Russell v. McLellan

21 F. Cas. 53 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · May 15, 1847

See cases in Allen v. Blunt [Case No. 217]. … Hylton v. Brown [Case No. 6.981]; Bas v. Steele [Id. 1.088]; Dunham v. Riley [Id. 4,155].