Case law

Local 900, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

727 F.2d 1184 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 10, 1984

reviewing court with the Board’s views, see NLRB v. … NLRB v.

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations Board

459 F.2d 1329 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 25, 1972

.”); Tendler v. … In fact, there are numerous cases holding that the charging party does not have standing to enforce a Board subpoena in collateral proceedings. See, e. g., Wilmot v. Doyle, supra; NLRB v.

Herder v. Helvering

106 F.2d 153 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1939

We affirm the Board in this respect. Avery v. Com’r, 5 Cir., 22 F.2d 6 , 55 A.L.R. 1277 . … Referring to the Herder Rice Milling Co., witness said; “I had charge of the books and records.” 9 Jones v. Com’r, 7 Cir., 38 F.2d 550 ; Perry v. Com’r, 22 B.T.A. 13 ; Brown v.

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Cooper Associates, Inc. T/a Raymond's Liquors and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Cooper Associates, Inc. T/a Raymond's Liquors and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. Janet Cooper and Lois Cooper and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

607 F.2d 1385 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 28, 1979

In O'Leary v. … Decision) 6 Banks v.

Roy Daniel v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr.

766 F.3d 57 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 12, 2014

Phillips v. Fulwood, 616 F.3d 577, 579 (D.C. Cir. 2010).  3 In 1987, the Board replaced the 1972 Guidelines with another regime. … See Brown v. Williamson, 314 F. App’x 492, 497 (3d Cir. 2009); see also Puifory v. Reilly, No. 3:08-CV- 982, 2009 WL 839354, at *6-7 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2009) (same).

Belay v. District of Columbia

860 A.2d 365 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 2004

In addition to people on foot, those in wheelchairs, on bicycles or skate boards or scooters may use a crosswalk. … Hill v. United States, 529 A.2d 788, 790 (D.C.1987); Brown v. United States, 579 A.2d 1158, 1159 (D.C.1990). Belay agreed to the terms imposed at the time of sentencing.

Johnson v. Fairfax Village Condominium IV Unit Owners Ass'n

641 A.2d 495 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 1994

Brown v. Dyer, 489 A.2d 1081, 1084 (D.C.1985); Gordon, 462 A.2d at 13 . … Williams v. Board of Trustees of Mount Jezreel Baptist Church, 589 A.2d 901, 907 (D.C.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 190 , 116 L.Ed.2d 151 (1991).

Gavett v. Alexander

477 F. Supp. 1035 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 4, 1979

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 736-7 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). Finally, the “political” arguments advanced by the parties are wholly unpersuasive. … See Buckley v. Valeo, supra, 424 U.S. at 65 , 96 S.Ct. 612 ; Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663, 670 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966); Shapiro v.

United States v. District of Columbia Appeal of Prince George's County, Maryland (Intervenor-Deft.). State Water Control Board v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Appeal of Prince George's County, Maryland (Intervenor-Deft.). State Water Control Board, an Agency of the Commonwealth of Virginia v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Appeal of Prince George's County, Maryland (Intervenor-Deft.). United States of America v. District of Columbia Appeal of Prince George's County, Maryland. State Water Control Board v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission Appeal of Prince George's County, Maryland. United States of America v. District of Columbia Appeal of Prince George's County, Maryland

654 F.2d 802 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 29, 1981

Brown v. Neeb, 25 Fair Empl. Prac. Cases 267 (Lab.Rel.Rep. … See Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 501 F.2d 383 (4th Cir. 1974); Grenchik v. Mandel, 373 F.Supp. 1298 (D.Md.1973). 19 In New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v.

Franklin Phillips v. Interior Board of Mine Operations Appeals, Bituminous Coaloperators' Association and Kentucky Carbon Corporation, Intervenors

500 F.2d 772 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 26, 1974

The Supreme Court has construed the corresponding NLRA provision broadly: in NLRB v. … Decision of Board, in App. at 37. . Id. at 39. This has been the position of the Board in another case which is presently before this court, Munsey v. Morton, No. 72-2095. .

Dan-Air Services, Ltd. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, British Midland Airways, Ltd. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, British Midland Airways, Ltd. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

475 F.2d 408 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 15, 1973

475 F.2d 408 154 U.S.App.D.C. 297 DAN-AIR SERVICES, LTD., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. BRITISH MIDLAND AIRWAYS, LTD., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. … F.T.C. v.

Stephenson v. Hoyt

22 F. Cas. 1303 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1854

Judge Washington, in the case of Gray v. … So also, Bovell v. Thorne, Dav. Pat.

American Federation Of Television And Radio Artists, Afl-Cio, Kansas City Local v. National Labor Relations Board

395 F.2d 622 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 1968

We begin by noting the deference a court gives to a Board finding of impasse. See Dallas General Drivers etc. v. … Drivers etc. v. NLRB, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 417, 420 , 355 F.2d 842 , 845 (1966); NLRB v.

International Union, United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

442 F.2d 893 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 1971

The Board rejected the findings and dismissed the proceedings. … Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1950).

United States v. Muhammad Abdul-Saboor

85 F.3d 664 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1996

Chimel v. … See United States v.

Shalom Baranes Associates, P.C. v. 900 F Street Corp.

940 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 1996

In sum, the evidence establishes that either an express contract or a contract implied-in-fact, see Brown v. … Bowler v. Joyner, 562 A.2d 1210 (D.C.1989).

Truck Drivers and Helpers, Local Union 568, Affiliated With International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. And Union of Transportation Employees, Truck Drivers and Helpers, Local Union 568, Affiliated With International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Intervenor

379 F.2d 137 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 1967

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … In Ferro v.

Adamski v. McHugh

304 F. Supp. 3d 227 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 2015

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Thomas Adamski is a former soldier in the United States Army who has spent decades trying to get the Army to modify his military records. … . at 24 (citing Mullen v.

Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Mohawk Airlines, Inc., and Command Airways, Inc., Intervenors. Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Mohawk Airlines, Inc., and Air North, Inc., Intervenors. Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board

458 F.2d 846 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 1972

AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Mohawk Airlines, Inc., and Air North, Inc., Intervenors. AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. … orders. 10 Western Air Lines v.

Maloney v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2021

See Kowal, 16 F.3d at 1276; see also Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678 (internal citation omitted) (“Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”); Browning v. … See Spaeth v. Georgetown Univ., 943 F. Supp. 2d 198, 210 (D.D.C. 2013), citing Zahorik v.