Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
9.35s
42 Tex. Crim. 176 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 29, 1900
In King v. … In Shaw v.
Cited 14 timesPublished42 Ohio St. 2d 53 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1975
In connection with these two sections, it was fittingly pointed out by Justice Stern as obiter dictum in his opinion for a unanimous court in the case of DeLong v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. R. C. 3319.07 reads: “The board of education of each city, exempted village, and local school district shall employ the teachers of the public schools of their respective districts.
Cited 14 timesPublished383 S.C. 506 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jul 27, 2009
Stokes v. … State v.
Cited 12 timesPublished14 Kan. 377 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Jan 15, 1875
For whatever doubts may have heretofore existed thereon, they have been put at rest by the decision of the supreme court of the United States in the case of Johnson v.
Cited 11 timesPublished62 Mich. 473 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1886
The note, being by its terms payable to Elias Brown or bearer, would make it payable to any lawful holder without any indorsement by Brown. … Brown or bearer five, hundred dollars, at Comfort’s Roller Mills, value received, with 8 per cent, interest. “Woolston Comfort. “Elias Brown.” See Mynning v. D., L. & N. R. R.
Cited 18 timesPublished201 Utah Adv. Rep. 4 · Utah Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1992
In effect, the employer provided room and board for workers at' the camp. The employer purchased the food for those who lived in the compound. … See People v.
Cited 91 timesPublished103 Tenn. 449 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1899
Code, *454 Section 4614 (M. & V., Sec. 5365). … State v. Yardley, 95 Tenn., 546 .
Cited 25 timesPublished35 Wash. 2d 379 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1949
In State v. … In State v.
Cited 34 timesPublished2026 Ohio 1807 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 18, 2026
[Cite as State v. Brown, 2026-Ohio-1807.] … See State v. Addicott, 2025-Ohio-1785, ¶ 42 (11th Dist.), citing State v. Ricks at 2013- Ohio-3712, ¶ 20, citing State v.
Cited 1 timesPublished47 Neb. 399 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1896
(Byington v. Moore, 62 Ia., 470 ; Hinson v. Bailey, 73 Ia., 544 ; Black v. Hoyt, 33 O. St., 203; Lessee of Mitchell v. Ryan, 3 O. St., 377; Albright v. Albright, 70 Wis., 528 ; Ball v. Foreman, 37 O. … (Bunz v. Cornelius, 19 Neb., 107 ; Connell v. Galligher, 39 Neb., 793 .)
Cited 42 timesPublished40 Mo. 52 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1867
In the case of the State v. … In the case of the State v.
Cited 16 timesPublished163 Tenn. 178 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1931
In Stratton v. … The foregoing was approved in Hascall v. Hafford, 107 Tenn., 355 , and language of the same import was used in Brown v. Brown, 150 Tenn., 89 . In Denny v.
Cited 15 timesPublished2 Denio 375 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1845
Brown & Co. under the circumstances stated in the special verdict became parties to that contract, and were entitled to enforce it by action against the defendants. … Brown & Co. rity of contract between the *377 plaintiffs and the defendants, and agreeing substantially with the positions laid down in the opinion of the supreme court.
Cited 8 timesPublished191 Wis. 256 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1926
Ellis v. Barron County, 120 Wis. 390 , 98 N. W. 232 . No written notice of the entry of the order having been served, the appeal was within time.
Cited 2 timesPublished84 Ga. 338 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 31, 1890
Brown to convey the land to him (Wilson Brown) to secure him (Wilson Brown) for standing security for him (Polhill) to said Ellis. … Brown to make to Wilson Brown was a security for a debt. Polhill was the owner of the land, and Wilson Brown held it merely as a security or indemnity.
Cited 46 timesPublished98 N.Y. 388 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1885
(Reeder v. Sayre, 70 N. Y. 180 ; Harris v. Tumbridge, 83 id. 92.) … In Pease v.
Cited 27 timesPublished24 N.Y.2d 421 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1969
Brown walked away from him and entered a building at 126th Street and came out shortly thereafter and rejoined Mr. Brown. I observed Mr. Brown and that other person come close together. … People v. White, 16 N Y 2d 270), and no misstatements when questioned about observed activity (People v.
Cited 40 timesPublished71 Me. 432 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 19, 1880
Herlihy v. Smith, 116 Mass. 265 . So in Sheridan v. … Howe v. Newmarch, 12 Allen, 49 . The relation of master and servant must exist at the time of the injui-y.
Cited 21 timesPublished300 N.C. 41 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1980
Appeal of Defendant Brown Defendant Brown first assigns as error the denial of his motion to sever the charged offenses. … State v. Scott, supra.
Cited 30 timesPublished141 Ohio St. 457 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 5, 1943
That she was attending Wilmington College at said time, and using said automobile to go to and from her home in Hamersville, Brown county, Ohio.
Cited 45 timesPublished
Ask Donna