Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMA

6,734 results

0.78s

  • Westfield High School L.I.F.E. Club v. City of Westfield

    249 F. Supp. 2d 98 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 17, 2003

    The Act’s promise of absolute immunity is illusory, as the Supremacy Clause prevents Massachusetts from limiting remedies provided by federal law as, for instance, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of the Establishment … Clearly, the balance of hardships weighs in their favor. 4.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Massachusetts Ass'n of Older Americans v. Spirito

    92 F.R.D. 129 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 20, 1981

    Although plaintiffs concede that it is not possible to determine which persons whose AFDC or SSI benefits were terminated due to excess income were still at an income level which qualified them for Medicaid, it is fair to … This aspect of the case is clearly appropriate for class certification under Rule 23(b)(2).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Landry v. Attorney General

    429 Mass. 336 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 13, 1999

    Eight drops of blood are collected by a qualified person following a finger prick with a lancet provided in a special testing kit. See 515 Code Mass. Regs. § 1.04(3)(g), (j), (k). … The balance of interests clearly weighs in favor of the use of DNA in accordance with the Act to create a record, of identification. We need not discuss the judge’s other reasoning 11 or the “special needs” analysis.

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • Bogan v. City of Boston

    432 F. Supp. 2d 222 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 11, 2006

    Section 1983 is a qualified civil rights statute under section 1988. Maine v. Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1, 11 , 100 S.Ct. 2502 , 65 L.Ed.2d 555 (1980). … Plaintiffs clearly fall under the definition of prevailing parties as they received a jury verdict in their favor against the City and received damages of $30,000 (in total) for a section 1983 civil rights claim.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Huertas v. Astrue

    844 F. Supp. 2d 197 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 21, 2012

    SiVStand Option Plaintiff first argues that the above hypothetical did not sufficiently establish to the VE the frequency at which the potential employee must change position. … In addition, the claimant in Arocho was only qualified to perform sedentary work.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Tracia v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.

    164 F. Supp. 3d 201 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 10, 2016

    In order to qualify for LTD benefits, eligible' employees are required to provide Liberty with “Proof of continued ... Disability.” (DF ¶ 4). … There is clearly a myofas-cial component to his axial low back pain which may be addressed with [physical therapy], topical lidocaine, and potentially trigger point injections.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.

    381 Mass. 507 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 9, 1980

    Furthermore, the question was not clearly presented until Nelson v. Richwagen, 326 Mass. 485 (1950). See White v. Thomson, 324 Mass. 140, 143 (1949). … The court then likened the policies involved to those underlying parent-child tort immunity. Id.

    Superseded by statute, as recognized in Lijoi v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityCited 200 timesPublished
  • In re First Barnstable Corp.

    108 B.R. 372 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 9, 1989

    Dennis, Sr., a qualified real estate appraiser, described the resort property and gave an opinion of it’s value. … appraised value of $2,500,000 less costs of rehabilitation: 1) Municipal liens - $ 35,032.19 2) First mortgage - $2,062,793.30 3) Second mortgage - $ 950,000.00 (approx.) 4) Third mortgage - $1,500,000.00 $4,547,825.49 Clearly

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Boston Firefighters Union, Local 718, International Association of Fire Fighters, AFL-CIO v. City of Boston

    Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 30, 2023

    Vaccination against COVID-19, however, has served as an important tool in achieving higher levels of immunity among the population as the pandemic continues, see id., because individuals who are vaccinated … relief does not promote the public interest, the single justice abused her discretion in issuing the preliminary injunction because the potential harm to the city and the public resulting from the spread of COVID-19 clearly

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Watts Water Technologies, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

    22 Mass. L. Rptr. 659 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Jul 11, 2007

    The italicized “insured” is a defined term in the Policy, meaning “any person or organization qualifying as an insured in the ’’Persons Insured" provision of the applicable insurance coverage." Policy at 1. … If the insurer wishes to impose this limitation on its insureds, it may do so by clearly so stating in the insurance policy.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Meijer, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Inc.

    District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 27, 2019

    ; 2) plaintiffs cannot demonstrate proximate cause and 3) plaintiffs cannot establish a predicate offense under RICO. … Noerr-Pennington Immunity Ranbaxy contends that it is entitled to Noerr- Pennington immunity which immunizes government petitioning activity even

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Inhabitants of Lynnfield v. Inhabitants of Peabody

    219 Mass. 322 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 24, 1914

    was not to be applied to grants preceding such establishment. … Woods, 108 Mass. 160, 169 , 170: “Unless qualified by restrictive words, they pass the soil towards the centre of the water, as far as the grantor owns.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • United States v. Edwards

    19 F. Supp. 3d 366 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 16, 2014

    The First Circuit in Janosko established a three-part test qualifying the meaning of “other expenses” under Section 3663A(b)(4). 642 F.3d at 42 . … This Court is “clearly without authority” to award fees and costs in a “wholly separate civil suit” from state court, and will not do so here. Barany, 884 F.2d at 1261 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Finnegan v. Baker

    32 Mass. L. Rptr. 455 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Apr 30, 2014

    “This connection is established if the corporate powers were used or necessary for the commission of the alleged misconduct.” … They have not shown that the Special Master’s finding that to date, they have not done so, was clearly erroneous.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dolan v. Commonwealth

    304 Mass. 325 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 28, 1939

    Whatever may have been the common law it is established that under existing statutes (see G. L. [Ter. … At any rate it clearly is without merit. The facts found constitute contempt. Hurley v. Commonwealth, 188 Mass. 443 . Opinion of the Justices, 301 Mass. 615, 618 .

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • United States v. Martinez

    102 F. Supp. 2d 39 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 21, 2000

    Because the indictment establishes probable cause to believe that the defendants committed the crimes charged for purposes of a § 3142(e) detention hearing, see United States v. … The language of the re-buttable presumption and of subsection (g)(1) clearly evinces Congress’s intent to prevent a defendant in a narcotics case from fleeing.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Buswell

    468 Mass. 92 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 13, 2014

    Contrast the Model Penal Code’s less stringent approach to establishing attempt. … The prosecutor’s questions clearly focused on the defendant’s belief, and the jury received other evidence concerning the actual age at which an individual is legally able to give consent.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • McLaughlin Ex Rel. McLaughlin v. Boston School Committee

    976 F. Supp. 53 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 29, 1997

    assignment procedure for the three examination schools, established by Judge Garrity, will continue to be in effect.” … Abigail Thernstrom, both highly qualified. Prof.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Robert and Ardis James Foundation v. Meyers

    87 Mass. App. Ct. 85 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Feb 12, 2015

    James's personal accounts, but from plaintiff the Robert and Ardis James Foundation (foundation), a charitable entity for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code, organized under the laws of New York, whose purpose is to make qualifying … The standard of review is well established. The judge's findings of fact are accepted unless they are clearly erroneous. Anastos v. Sable, 443 Mass. 146, 149 (2004).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mullane v. Chambers

    206 F. Supp. 2d 105 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 6, 2002

    The limited evidence placed before the court at trial regarding the trust does not establish that the trust was the true owner of the vessel. … Stated more clearly, the mere fact that Dr.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.