Case law

Application of St. of Oklahoma Bldg. Bonds Commission

202 Okla. 454 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1950

In the case of Baker v. … In the case of Board of Ed. of City of Shawnee v. American Nat.

EGLESTON v. CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION

2015 OK CIV APP 66 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 2015

OSCN Found Document:EGLESTON v. … King v.

Austin-Western Road MacHinery Co. v. Broard of Com'rs of Carter County

160 Okla. 232 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1932

No. 1 v. Foster Dumber Co., cited supra, holds favorable to plaintiff. … This court had chapter 49, supra, under consideration in the case of Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley, Co. Treas., 142 Okla. 8 , 285 P. 48 , and at page 15 of Okla.

Hayes v. Oklahoma City

187 Okla. 490 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1940

McKee v. Bowlin, 184 Okla. 486 , 87 P. 2d 1079 , and other cases. … WELCH, V. C. J., and OSBORN, GIBSON, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

Public Service Co. v. Parkinson

192 Okla. 607 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1943

Co. v. Excise Board of Bryan County, 181 Okla. 229 , 73 P. 2d 173 . The legality of the rate of levy has been established. Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County Excise Board, 187 Okla. 591 , 104 P. 2d 441 . … Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. Sutton, 185 Okla. 665 , 95 P. 2d 648 , and Bonaparte, Co. Treas., v. American Vinegar Mfg. Co., 161 Okla. 54 , 17 P. 2d 441 . Minute perfection of detail is not required. 61 C.

Weaver v. Bishop

174 Okla. 492 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1935

Hunzicker v. Pulliam, 168 Okla. 632 , 37 P. (2d) 417 ; Zahn v. Board of Public Works (Cal.) 234 P. 388 ; Miller v. Board of Public Works, (Cal.) 234 P. 381 . 47 S. Ct. 460 ; 273 U. S. 781 ; Freeman v. … Board of Adjustment (Mont.) 34 P. (2d) 534; Bradley v. Board of Zoning Adjustment (Mass.) 150 N. E. 802 .

Wey v. City of Hobart

66 Okla. 175 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1917

And in Lawrence v. … If the plaintiff has suffered any injury by the laying out, it has been caused by his own neglect, and he ought not to derive advantage from concealing or not disclosing his title. * * * Brown v.

In Re Assessment of National Bank of Tulsa

188 Okla. 225 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1941

McBirney v. Board of Equalization of Tulsa County, 184 Okla. 564 , 89 P. 2d 314 ; Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. State, 169 Okla. 334 , 37 P. 2d 298 ; Mid-Continent Building Co. v. … Board of Equalization of Tulsa County, 184 Okla. 525 , 88 P. 2d 626 , and Shell Petroleum Corporation v. State Board of Equalization, 170 Okla. 581 , 41 P. 2d 106 .

Camps v. Taylor

66 O.B.A.J. 1113 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1995

Bass v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc., Okl., 804 P.2d 1138, 1139 (1991); Brown & Root v. Dunkelberger, 196 Okl. 116 , 162 P.2d 1018, 1020 (1945). . … Williams v. Mulvihill, Okl., 846 P.2d 1097 , 1102 n. 14 (1993); Board of Law Library Trustees v. State, Okl., 825 P.2d 1285, 1288 (1992). . Pryse Monument Co. v. District Court, Etc., Okl., 595 P.2d 435, 438 (1979). .

Rivers v. School Dist. No. 51, Noble County

68 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1918

At this meeting, the personnel of the official board was also somewhat changed. … School Dist. v. Ward, 40 Okla. 97 , 136 Pac. 588 . Webster v.

Protest of First Nat. Bank of Guthrie

136 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1929

State v. Board of Examiners (Mont.) 104 Pac. 1055 .” And this was the use made of the word in Re Shirley, 122 Okla. 109 . 251 Pac. 736 . … Sometimes the excise board would certify a tax rate in excess of that authorized by law. This court had from time to time held that such acts made the tax rate illegal. Albrecht v. Jones, 132 Okla. 277 , 267 Pac. 270 .

Keyes v. Everest

61 O.B.A.J. 2226 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1990

Following the Board’s adjournment, Assessor timely filed several hundred appeals to the district court, in each case challenging the Board’s grant of relief to taxpayers who had not filed complaints within the twenty-day … Tulsa County Board of Equalization v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County, 743 P.2d 1076, 1078 (Okla.1987); Bliss Hotel Co. v. Thompson, 378 P.2d 319, 321 (Okla.1962).

Apartments Bldg. Co. v. Smiley

26 F.2d 469 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 24, 1928

, and Greene v. … United States v. Board of Commissioners of Osage County, 1 F.(2d) 701 (8 C. C. A.); First National Bank of Greeley v. Board of Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, supra.

Melvin v. Dunn

607 P.2d 694 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 26, 1980

The Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma issued a writ of mandamus in Poulos v. … Tulsa Classroom Teachers Assn., Inc. v.

Cross Tp., Kay County v. Wallace

57 Okla. 726 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 16, 1916

County v. … In Board of Commissioners of Washita County v.

Young v. State

41 Okla. Crim. 226 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1928

Menefee v. State, 30 Okla. Cr. 400 , 236 P. 439 ; Cummings v. State, 32 Okla. *235 Cr. 274, 240 P. 1078 ; Raymer v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 385 , 241 P. 499 ; Buchanan v. State, 33 Okla. Cr. 312 , 243 P. 992 ; Roof v. … Ussaery v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 397 , 212 P. 137 ; Lacy v. State, 30 Okla. Cr. 273 , 236 P. 53 ; Collins v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 136 , 240 P. 135 ; Brown v. State, 24 Okla. Cr. 161 , 216 P. 944 ; Wilkie v. State, 33 Okla.

Crown Drug Co. v. Hofstrom

158 Okla. 27 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1932

Drumright Feed Co. v. Hunt, 90 Okla. 277 , 217 P. 491 ; Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. Molloy, 146 Okla. 157 , 294 P. 112 ; Mobley v Brown, 151 Okla. 167 , 2 P. (2d) 1034 . … Session Laws 1923, is settled in this jurisdiction by the case of Mobley v. Brown, 151 Okla. 167 , 2 P. (2d) 1034 .

Jackson v. State

86 Okla. Crim. 420 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 13, 1948

See Cochran v. State, 4 Okla. … Martin v. Territory, 4 Okla. 105 , 43 P. 1067 ; Hawkins v. State, 55 Okla. Cr. 396 , 32 P. 2d 101 ; Cassell v. State, 76 Okla.

Wilson v. Wilson

738 P.2d 1382 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1987

Huchteman, supra; Brown v. Brown, 607 P.2d 1358 (Okl.1980). … Brown, supra. With regard to child support, the court may consider the relative earning capacities of the parties or change thereof in making its determination *1384 of modification. DeGraffenreid v.

Liles v. Department of the Navy Board for Correction of Naval Records

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 21, 2025

Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 303 (1983); see also Charlton v. Donley, 846 F. … For all these reasons, the Court finds the Board’s decision was not arbitrary and capricious. V.