Case law

Shalom Baranes Associates, P.C. v. 900 F Street Corp.

940 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 1996

In sum, the evidence establishes that either an express contract or a contract implied-in-fact, see Brown v. … Bowler v. Joyner, 562 A.2d 1210 (D.C.1989).

United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp. Ex Rel. United States v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.

98 F.2d 238 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 1938

Co. v. … Co. v. Fruin-Colnon Cont. Co., 8 Cir., 32 F.2d 425 ; Bank v. South Jacksonville v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., supra; National City Bank v. National Security Co., supra; Murray v. American Surety Co., supra; Gordon v. Mass.

John Cunningham v. John F. English

269 F.2d 539 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 1959

C., for Board of Monitors. Mr. Martin F. O'Donoghue, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for Board of Monitors. Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER and FAHY, Circuit Judges. … Brown, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1945, 64 F.Supp. 168, 178 ; 3 Moore, Federal Practice, par. 23.24, at 3549 (2d ed. 1948); 2 Barron and Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 570, at 185 (Rules ed. 1950). 8 While the Rule must be given

Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees v. Railroad Retirement Board

239 F.2d 37 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 18, 1956

National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc., supra; Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United States, 1939, 307 U.S. 125 , 59 S.Ct. 754 , 83 L.Ed. 1147 . … See also Mahoney v. Railroad Retirement Board, 7 Cir.1952, 194 F.2d 752 ; Railroad Retirement Board v.

Interstate Waste Services of New Jersey, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

236 F. App'x 637 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 25, 2007

Our review of Board representation election decisions is deferential and focused on ensuring “appropriate and fair procedures.” Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers Union v. NLRB, 736 F.2d 1559 , 1564 (D.C.Cir.1984). … But we also take some “responsibility for the reasonableness and fairness of Labor Board decisions,” Universal Camera Corp. v.

A. P. Desanno & Son, Inc. v. Mary Grace Brown, A. P. Desanno & Son, Inc. v. Donna Elaine Wooster

313 F.2d 898 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 10, 1963

JAMARR MEDLEY ANTOINE RICHARDSON and LUCIOUS MCLEOD v. UNITED STATES

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 2014

Catlett v. … Scott v.

Nichols v. Board of Trustees of the Asbestos Workers Local 24 Pension Plan

725 F. Supp. 568 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 1989

See Nichols v. Board of Trustees, No. 80-0563, slip op. (D.D.C. July 19, 1982). The Court of Appeals reversed. See Nichols v. Board of Trustees, 835 F.2d 881 (D.C.Cir.1987). … See Linfors v. United States, 673 F.2d 332 (11th Cir.1982). In McKart v.

United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. National Labor Relations Board

462 F.2d 298 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 1972

Highland Supply Corp. v. Reynolds Metals Co., 327 F.2d 725, 729 (8th Cir. 1964). See also Dick v. New York Life Ins. Co., 359 U.S. 437, 445 , 79 S.Ct. 921 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 935 (1959). … See, e. g., Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Local 4-243 v. N.L.R.B., 124 U.S.App.D. *301 C. 113, 115, 362 F.2d 943, 945 (1966); Warehousemen & Mail Order Employees, Local 743, I.B.T. etc. v.

Escobedo v. Geren

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2009

Piersall v. Winter, 435 F.3d 319, 324 (D.C. Cir. 2006). Military boards are entitled to even greater deference than civilian administrative agencies. Labin v. Harvey, Civ. No. 05-315, 2006 WL 949884, *5 (D.D.C. … Casey v. United States, 8 Cl. Ct. 234, 239 (Fed. Cl. 1985); see also Simmons v. Brown, 497 F. Supp. 173, 178 (D. Md. 1980) (regulations of the branches of service must be in accord with DoD regulations); cf. Holz v.

Lee v. Household Finance Corporation

263 A.2d 635 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1970

Beatty v. Franklin Investment Co., 115 U.S.App.D.C. 311 , 319 F.2d 712 (1963); Calvert Credit Corp. v. Williams, D.C.App., 256 A.2d 902 (1969). … E. g., Freas v. Gitomer, D.C.App., 256 A.2d 573 (1969); D.C.Code 1967, § 17-305(a).

Jones v. Astrue

647 F.3d 350 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 5, 2011

SEC v. … See Jackson v.

Oil, Chemical And Atomic Workers, International Union, Aflcio, Et Al. v. National Labor Relations Board

486 F.2d 1266 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 28, 1973

B. v. … See, e.g., NLRB v. Southern Calif. Dist. Council of Laborers, 443 F.2d 220 (9 Cir. 1971) 13 Cf. NLRB v. Dover Tavern Owners' Ass'n, 412 F.2d 725 (3d Cir. 1969) 14 See, e. g., Douds v.

Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Lexicon Title Services, LLC.

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 10, 2026

Id.; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See MedImmune, Inc. v.

Brewster v. Kinlein

209 A.2d 788 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1965

Petitioner did not appear but her counsel explained that she could add nothing more than what was contained in her application already before the Board. . See Corbett v. … Kinlein, D.C.App., 191 A.2d 246 (1963); Matheson v. Practical Nurses’ Examining Board, D.C.App., 195 A.2d 402 (1963); Cf. Sherman v. Physical Therapists’ Examining Board, D.C. App., 208 A.2d 728 (Decided March 31, 1965).

Flocco v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

752 A.2d 147 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 25, 2000

Brown v. Tenney, 125 Ill.2d 348 , 126 Ill.Dec. 545 , 532 N.E.2d 230, 232 (1988). In a traditional derivative action, a shareholder seeks to assert the rights of the corporation in which he or she holds stock. … As pointed out in Brown v.

Alexander v. Tomlinson

507 F. Supp. 2d 2 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2007

See Barnette v. Chertoff, 453 F.3d 513, 515 (D.C.Cir.2006) (ADEA claims); Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999) (Title VII claims); Mungin v. … Czekalski v. Peters, 475 F.3d 360, 364 (D.C.Cir.2007). “Mere idiosyncrasies of personal preference,” however, are “not sufficient to state an injury.” Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 .

Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

275 F.2d 646 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 1960

We think the Board’s order is correct except that it goes too far in directing reimbursement of the dues and fees paid to the union by all casual employees. National Labor Relations Board v. … As so modified, the Board’s order will be enforced. It is so ordered. . We have considered the opinion of the Seventh Circuit in National Labor Relations Board v.

Adamski v. McHugh

304 F. Supp. 3d 227 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 2015

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Thomas Adamski is a former soldier in the United States Army who has spent decades trying to get the Army to modify his military records. … . at 24 (citing Mullen v.

Truck Drivers and Helpers, Local Union 568, Affiliated With International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. And Union of Transportation Employees, Truck Drivers and Helpers, Local Union 568, Affiliated With International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Intervenor

379 F.2d 137 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 1967

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … In Ferro v.