Case law

Peterson v. Scotia Prince Cruises, Ltd.

323 F. Supp. 2d 128 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 9, 2004

See, e.g., United States v. … David is the deputy chief medical examiner for the State of Maine, board certified in the fields of clinical neurophysiology and legal medicine, chairman of the Board of Licensure in Medicine for the State of Maine and past

Jordan v. Goodside

123 Me. 330 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 21, 1923

This changed rule was applied in Merrill Trust Co. v. Brown, 122 Maine, 101, a case decided after the passage of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and is now the law in this State. … Bank v.

LeMay v. Anderson

397 A.2d 984 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 16, 1979

Davis v. Briggs, 117 Me. 536, 540 , 105 A. 128, 129 (1918), quoting Cadwalader v. Bailey, 17 R.I. 495 , 23 A. 20, 21 (1891); Jones v. Stevens, 276 Mass. 318, 322 , 177 N.E. 91, 93 (1931), quoting Willets v. … See Watson v. French, 112 Me. 371, 375 , 92 A. 290, 291 (1914); Brown v. Dickey, 106 Me. 97, 101 , 75 A. 382, 384 (1909).

OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS v. CALPERS CORPORATE PARTNERS LLC

District Court, D. Maine · Oct 30, 2020

Morales-Melecio v. … See In re Brown Publishing Co., No. 10–73295–reg, 2015 WL 1009177, at *2 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.

Stuart v. Lake

33 Me. 87 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1851

Ticonic Bank v. Smiley, 27 Maine, 225. … One of the charges, in the plaintiff’s account sued, is for boarding the defendant and his wife.

State v. Faust

696 A.2d 1088 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 24, 1997

State v. Devlin, 618 A.2d 203, 204 (Me.1992); State v. Chase, 505 A.2d 791, 793 (Me.1986) (Chase II)(citing State v. Brooks, 366 A.2d 179, 181 (Me.1976)). … Chase II, 505 A.2d at 793 (quoting State v.

Chapman v. City of Rockland

524 A.2d 46 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 13, 1987

Durepos v. Town of Van Buren, 516 A.2d 565, 566 (Me.1986). A dispatcher is the community’s link with emergency services. … Have exclusive authority to remove for cause after notice and hearing till persons whom he is authorized to appoint and report all removals to the board of selectmen.

Trask v. Fraternal Order of Police

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 30, 2018

Friends of Lincoln Lake v Board of Environmental Protection, 2001 ME. 18 if13, 989 A. 2d 1128. … Maine Labor Relations Board, 427 A.2d 973, 974, n.l (Me. 1981) and State v. Maine Labor Relations Board, 413 A. 2d 510, 513 (Me. 1980).

State v. Hasenbank

425 A.2d 1330 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 27, 1981

State v. Cefalo, Me., 396 A.2d 233, 239 (1979), including note 13, citing Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 506 , 73 S.Ct. 397, 446 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1963), and Watts v. … See Walker v. United States, supra at 377-78; State v.

May v. City of Auburn

112 Me. 143 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 9, 1914

general and comprehensive clause: “And do all professional acts incident to the office or which may be required of him by the mayor, city council or either branch thereof, or any committee thereof, or any administrative board … Calais v.

Burrill v. Giles

119 Me. 111 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 29, 1920

The plaintiff cites Burleigh v. White, Admr., 64 Maine, 25; White v. Brown, Admr., 67 Maine, 196; Holmes, Admr. v. Brooks, surviving partner, 68 Maine, 416; in support of this contention. … Haskell v. Hervey, 74 Maine, 192. Rawson Admr. v. Knight, 73 Maine 340 . Her evidence was ample to sustain the decree. Appeal dismissed with costs.

Canal National Bank v. Mills

405 F. Supp. 249 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 18, 1975

See, e. g., United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75, 89 , 67 S.Ct. 556 , 91 L.Ed. 754 (1947); Muskrat v. … Thus, in United Public Workers of America v.

Gorham Sand & Gravel v. Town of Sebago

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 6, 2023

P. 80B Petition for Review of the decision of the Town Zoning Board of Appeals ("Board") remanding an application to the Town Planning Board. … GSG is correct that the rule applies to town boards of appeals regardless of formation date, see Lamarre v.

United States v. Sybal

468 F. Supp. 2d 219 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 3, 2007

U.S. v. Brown, 426 F.3d 32, 36 (1st Cir.2005). The determination of manifest necessity is a matter of discretion for the trial court. Id. … Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 , 17 S.Ct. 154 , 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896). 2 .

Bailey v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

176 F. Supp. 2d 3 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 17, 2001

See Brown v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 246 F.3d 1182, 1187 (9th Cir.2001); Maddox v. Univ. of Tennessee, 62 F.3d 843, 845-48 (6th Cir.1995); Leary v. Dalton, 58 F.3d, 748, 753-54 (1st Cir.1995); Little v. … See Brown, 246 F.3d at 1188 (taking into consideration whether the employee sought accommodation prior to her legal difficulties in determining whether accommodation was due); Taub v.

Saco Water Power Co. v. Goldthwaite

35 Me. 456 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1853

and privilege as described in their petition, it appears by the evidence, that the mill owners had used the premises for more than twenty years before the entry by the grantor of the respondent, by piling logs, timber and boards … Tilton v. Palmer, 31 Maine, 486. By statute, c. 121, § 9, the respondent might, on motion to the Court, at any time before judgment be allowed to appear and defend.

Ware v. Doane

227 F. Supp. 2d 169 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 21, 2002

Id. at 2230; Lyons v. Brown, 158 F.3d 605, 606-607 (1st Cir.1998); Bergeron v. Henderson, 47 F.Supp.2d 61, 64 (D.Me. 1999); 28 U.S.C. § 2679 (b)(1). … Bergeron, 47 *173 F.Supp.2d at 65 (citing Brown v. Armstrong, 949 F.2d 1007, 1012 (8th Cir.1991)). In Day v. Mass.

Salmon Lake Seed Co. v. Frontier Trust Co.

130 Me. 69 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 25, 1931

Pillsbury v. Brown, 82 Me., 450. … I., 117, 120; Swarts v. Narragansett, etc., Company, 26 R. I., 388; Wooster v. Crane & Company, 73 N. J. E., 22; Coast Fisheries Co. v. Linen Thread Co., supra; Thomas-Bonner Company v.

State v. McPartland

36 A.3d 881 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 2, 2012

See State v. … In addition, operation of a vehicle during the early hours of the morning, 3 *886 see State v. Brown, 675 A.2d 504, 505 (Me.1996), and speeding can both be suggestive of impairment, cf. State v.

Peaks v. Hutchinson

59 L.R.A. 279 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 29, 1902

See also Wentworth v. Wentworth, 69 Maine, 247. It is true that in Haggett v. Hurley, 91 Maine, 542, 41 L. R. … Russell v. Richards, 10 Maine, 429, 25 Am. Dec. 254 ; Hilborne v. Brown, 12 Maine, 162, and Tapley v.