Case law

International Union, United Automobile Aerospace And Agricultural Implement Workers Of America, Uaw v. National Labor Relations Board

470 F.2d 422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1972

B. v. … No. 149 (1971) (Members Fanning and Brown, dissenting), the Board had engaged in case-by-case examinations of the conflicting interests of the employees and management.

Yazzie v. National Organization for Women

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2021

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Ayissi-Etoh v. Fannie Mae, 712 F.3d 572, 576 (D.C. Cir. 2013). Indeed, the tests for evaluating all three types of claims under § 1981 are the same as under Title VII. See id. at 576–78; Brown v.

United States v. Philip Morris Inc.

116 F. Supp. 2d 131 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2000

Defendants also established a Scientific Advisory Board ("SAB”), which they claimed was an independent research arm of the CTR. Compl. at ¶ 61. … Brown & Williamson was certainly not the first occasion in which the Supreme Court expressed such a view. In FTC v.

Hovsepyan v. Blaya

770 F. Supp. 2d 259 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2011

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 459 (D.C.Cir.1999) (quoting Branson v. Price River Coal Co., 853 F.2d 768, 772 (10th Cir.1988)) (brackets in original) (language altered); see Slovinec v. … Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53, 68 , 126 S.Ct. 2405 , 165 L.Ed.2d 345 (2006)). The Board acknowledges that Mr.

Jenkins v. Howard University

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 2023

Ashcroft v. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (internal quotations omitted); see Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Bernhardt, 442 F.

Washington v. District of Columbia

530 F. Supp. 2d 163 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 11, 2008

The day after their capture, DOC Director Devon Brown issued written notification to twelve D.C. … If the employee chooses the former, the Public Employee Relations Board (“PERB”) has exclusive jurisdiction over claims on appeal from a CBA arbitration decision. Def.’s Opp’n at 3^4.

In re Klayman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 2025

Brown v. D.C. Pub. Emp. Rels. Bd., 19 A.3d 351, 355 (D.C. 2011) (quoting Spicer, 636 A.2d at 418). … See Comford v.

Dantzler v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

810 F. Supp. 2d 312 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 2011

Additionally, the plaintiff brings suit against the HPD and the Hammond Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board (“Civil Service Board”), seeking that the court order these defendants to schedule a date for a civil service … Brown, 1989 WL 45103, at *1 (D.C.Cir.1989).

Wilson v. Smoot

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2019

See Kowal, 16 F.3d at 1276; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. 5 Cir. 2002). … Board of Parole, pursuant to the regulations of the D.C. Board of Parole, to determine the prisoner’s suitability for release on parole.”).

Scott H. Bortree v. Stanley R. Resor, Secretary of the Army

445 F.2d 776 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 2, 1971

See Browning v. Laird, 323 F.Supp. 661, 664-665 (N.D.Cal.1969). Cf. United States v. James, 417 F.2d 826, 831-832 (4th Cir. 1969). … See Browning v. Laird, supra, 323 F.Supp. at 665 .

Dan-Air Services, Ltd. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, British Midland Airways, Ltd. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, British Midland Airways, Ltd. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

475 F.2d 408 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 15, 1973

475 F.2d 408 154 U.S.App.D.C. 297 DAN-AIR SERVICES, LTD., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. BRITISH MIDLAND AIRWAYS, LTD., Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. … F.T.C. v.

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations Board

459 F.2d 1329 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 25, 1972

.”); Tendler v. … In fact, there are numerous cases holding that the charging party does not have standing to enforce a Board subpoena in collateral proceedings. See, e. g., Wilmot v. Doyle, supra; NLRB v.

Board of Pharmacy of the District of Columbia v. Albert Feldman

279 F.2d 821 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1960

279 F.2d 821 108 U.S.App.D.C. 46 BOARD OF PHARMACY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Petitioner, v. Albert FELDMAN, Respondent. No. 15699. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. June 3, 1960. Messrs. … Board of Pharmacy, in which the Board had declined to renew respondent's license as a druggist, and remanded the case to the Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with the court's opinion. Feldman v.

Melva G. Brown v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

88 F.3d 1278 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 23, 1996

BROWN, Appellant, v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee. No. 95-5020. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. May 23, 1996. … In Bayer v.

Dahl v. Dickson

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 24, 2020

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. … See id.; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Haviv Schieber v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

520 F.2d 44 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 1975

Schieber v. INS, No. 71-1962 (unpublished order Nov. 1, 1971), cited in Schieber v. INS, 461 F.2d 1078, 1079 (2d Cir. 1972). 22 . Schieber v. INS, supra note 21. … United States, 369 U.S. 438, 446-50 , 82 S.Ct. 917 , 8 L.Ed.2d 21 (1962); United States v. Johnson, 327 U.S. 106, 113 , 66 S.Ct. 464 , 90 L.Ed. 562 (1946); Brown v.

International Union, United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

442 F.2d 893 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 1971

The Board rejected the findings and dismissed the proceedings. … Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1950).

Evans Financial Corp. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

161 F.3d 30 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 1998

Department of Labor ("DOL"), with administrative re- view by DOL's Benefits Review Board. Judicial review of a Board order is available in this court. See 33 U.S.C.  s 931(b)-(c); Shea v. … Our review is limited to determining whether the Board adhered to its authorized scope of review and whether it committed any errors of law. See Brown v. I.T.T./Continen- tal Baking Co., 921 F.2d 289, 292-93 (D.C.

Diamond Housing Corporation v. Robinson

257 A.2d 492 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 1969

In view of the fact that our opinion in Brown v. … When it is established that a lease is void and unenforceable under the Brown v.

Estate of Parsons v. Palestinian Authority

651 F.3d 118 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 12, 2011

Co. v. … Carducci v. Regan, 714 F.2d 171, 177 (D.C.Cir.1983). Judge Brown insists that “[o]ur forfeiture doctrine applies to legal arguments, not facts.” Brown Op. at 143. Not true.