Case law

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jakubowski

912 F. Supp. 1073 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 2, 1996

In this sense, Jakubowski clearly had contact with the issuing thrifts. … Given the plain meaning of the OTS regulation, the complaint clearly alleges that Jakubowski’s conduct violated the regulation.

Morgan v. Doe

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jan 13, 2021

Qualified Immunity With regard to Defendants New, Gimber, Mezo, Purdom, Miner, and Lawrence, the Court need not consider the issue of qualified immunity because it … The Court, however, rejects Defendant Hudson’s argument concerning qualified immunity.

Murry v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Local 1111

305 Ill. App. 3d 627 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 28, 1999

Where the evidence is found to so establish, an indictment is returned. 725 ILCS 5/112—4(e) (West 1996). … Clearly, respondent Board must assess the sufficiency of the evidence disclosed during its investigation prior to issuing an unfair labor practice complaint.

Kinsella v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

2015 IL App (1st) 132694 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 26, 2015

reading of these same rules and policy statements clearly does not demonstrate. … While evidence regarding retrograde extrapolation is admissible, it must be presented with a proper foundation and testified to by a qualified expert. People v. Ikerman, 2012 IL App (5th) 110299, ¶ 38.

Sims v. Atkins

456 Ill. Dec. 900 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 7, 2021

To qualify for a waiver of court costs, fees, and charges, a litigant must submit an application that is “sufficient to allow a court to determine whether an applicant qualifies for full or partial waiver of … A trial court’s decision is against the manifest weight of the evidence where the record clearly establishes that -5-  the opposite conclusion was the proper

Schmidt v. Niedert

45 Ill. App. 3d 9 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 30, 1976

A writing qualifies as “other evidence of indebtedness in writing” under section 16 only when one need not resort to parol evidence to establish the vital elements of the agreement. … This principle was delineated clearly in the recent case of Estate of Garrett v. Garrett (1975), 24 Ill.

Borden Chemicals & Plastics, L.P. v. Zehnder

312 Ill. App. 3d 35 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 14, 2000

The statute further defines the term “qualified property.” … Clearly, the facts and circumstances of Quill are distinguishable from the present case.

Heimann v. Roadway Express, Inc.

228 F. Supp. 2d 886 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 8, 2002

qualified for his job; and (4) the disability caused the adverse employment action. … In order to bring a claim under the Rehabilitation Act, a plaintiff must establish “that he suffers from a disability as defined under the Act; that he was otherwise qualified for the job; that he was involved in programs

Flex v. Department of Labor, Board of Review

125 Ill. App. 3d 1021 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 25, 1984

It is well established that Illinois courts have required that the Act be liberally interpreted to favor the awarding of benefits. (Griffitts Construction Co. v. … Jaudes’ letter clearly indicates that plaintiff’s child suffered severe and disabling injuries at birth.

American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Tyler

68 N.E.3d 442 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 22, 2016

The elements of a bailment claim are (1) an express or implied agreement to establish a bailment, (2) delivery of the property in good condition, (3) the bailee’s acceptance of the property, and (4) the bailee’s failure … ¶ 17 In Village of Bloomingdale, our supreme court addressed whether a quasi-contract claim qualifies as a claim asserting a public entity’s liability “based on contract” and thus is excepted from the immunity granted

People v. Delaney

2024 IL App (5th) 240231 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 8, 2024

The sole issue on appeal is whether the charged offense was a qualifying offense as defined in section 110-6.1(a)(1.5). … Nor was it necessary for Rodriguez to determine such issue where the defendant in that case clearly contemplated and used force capable of great bodily harm by driving away while part of an officer’s body was in the vehicle

National Surety Corp. v. Fast Motor Service, Inc.

213 Ill. App. 3d 500 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 3, 1991

Industrial Comm’n (1936), 364 Ill. 161 , 4 N.E.2d 82 , is clearly distinguishable. … In the present case Fast Motor established that Mr. Walker had expertise in the area of claims auditing and that he had been hired to conduct an audit of the insurance claims adjusted by National.

O'Hara v. Illinois Department of Mental Health

120 F. Supp. 2d 704 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 27, 2000

A plaintiff may establish a violation of Title VII by proving that discrimination based on race, sex, or some protected characteristic has created a hostile or abusive work environment. Meritor Sav. Bank, FSB v. … A prima facie case of discrimination requires that the plaintiff show that: (1) he in a protected group, (2) he was qualified for the job and performed satisfactorily, (3) he was subject to adverse action, and (4) employees

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Village of Arlington Heights

174 Ill. App. 3d 381 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 22, 1988

Although the certificate shall not be “construed as granting a monopoly, or an exclusive privilege, immunity or franchise” (Ill. Rev. … Both the Utilities Act and the Telephone Act establish plaintiffs’ right to construct their facilities upon public streets.

Stevens v. Illinois Central Railroad

306 Ill. 370 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1922

unless such extension or inclusion is clearly required by the intent and meaning of the context or disclosed by an examination of the entire act. … Applying these well established rules to the facts in this case, it is apparent that plaintiff failed to establish the preliminary requirements necessary to make the X-ray film admissible.

Teessen v. Camblin

1 Ill. App. 424 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 15, 1877

The other evidence in the case to establish a new promise is contained in the testimony of the witness Daniel ¡R. … Clearly not, and the jury properly found for the defendant.

In re Estate of John Schumann

2016 IL App (4th) 150844 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 20, 2017

Lack of standing qualifies as an “affirmative matter” within the meaning of section 2-619(a)(9). Schlenker, 209 Ill. 2d at 461, 808 N.E.2d at 998. … Kuecker, 2012 IL 111443, ¶ 54, 962 N.E.2d 418 (considering a motion to dismiss asserting immunity as a section 2-619 motion, despite its label as a section 2-615 motion). ¶ 15 “The doctrine of standing

People v. Popely

36 Ill. App. 3d 828 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 4, 1976

There is essentially no dispute as to the facts established at the hearing on the above motion. … he took her measurements, defendant told her she was not qualified for the job.

People v. Roti

2 Ill. App. 3d 264 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 9, 1971

In that case the evidence clearly showed that one co-defendant exercised considerably more dominion over the premises than the other, thereby undermining the contention that both were "in control." … We note that a contrary interpretation would virtually immunize a carefully compart-mentalized gambling operation from the sanctions of section 28-3, a result certainly not envisioned by the framers of that statute. • 4 In

Kimber v. City of Warrenville

248 Ill. App. 3d 361 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 2, 1993

, through public official immunity, from liability in this case. … Moreover, the facts establish that at the time of the accident Officer Pikolcz had abandoned pursuit.