Case law

Cadillac of Naperville, Inc. v. NLRB

14 F.4th 703 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 17, 2021

Although we “accord considerable deference” to the Board’s policy judgments, Stephens Media, LLC v. NLRB, 677 F.3d 1241, 1250 (D.C. … Chamber of Commerce v. Brown, 554 U.S. 60, 67 (2008) (quoting NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575, 617 (1969)).

Smith v. United States

26 A.3d 248 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 21, 2011

See Brown v. United States, 683 A.2d 118, 124 (D.C.1996). “The credibility of a witness may be attacked by any party, including the party calling the witness,” D.C.Code § 14-102(a) (2001); see also Sparks v. … Blunt v.

United States v. United States Gypsum Company

404 F. Supp. 619 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 10, 1975

; and (b) fix, maintain and stabilize the terms and conditions of sale thereof; and (c) adopt and maintain uniform methods of packaging, handling and delivery of gypsum board.” … United States Gypsum Company, National Gypsum Company, Georgia-Pacific Corporation, The Celotex Corporation, Colon Brown and Andrew J. Watt. 5 .

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 68, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

448 F.2d 1127 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 15, 1971

The Union’s argument must be that the record evidence to this effect is so overwhelming that the Board’s contrary conclusion is deprived of substantial evidence on the whole record. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. … This is asserted to be an additional reason for overturning the Board’s decision. Western States Regional Council No. 3, International Woodworkers of America v. N.L.R.B., 125 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 365 F.2d 934 (1966).

Alexander v. Tomlinson

507 F. Supp. 2d 2 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2007

See Barnette v. Chertoff, 453 F.3d 513, 515 (D.C.Cir.2006) (ADEA claims); Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999) (Title VII claims); Mungin v. … Czekalski v. Peters, 475 F.3d 360, 364 (D.C.Cir.2007). “Mere idiosyncrasies of personal preference,” however, are “not sufficient to state an injury.” Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 .

Thermolized Coal Corp. v. Coe

78 F.2d 228 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 13, 1935

In the Patent Office the Primary Examiner and the Board of Appeals both criticized the specification as too vague to satisfy the requirements. of section 4883, R. … The Board stated that the process carried out in the Bone patent is strikingly similar to that of the application.

Lee v. United States

699 A.2d 373 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1997

Lee’s conviction of ADW of Christine Brown merges with his convictions of both, mayhem while armed and armed robbery relating to Ms. Brown. See Hayward v. … In Waller v.

Tucker v. United States

421 A.2d 32 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1980

See Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 304 A.2d 21 (1973). Additionally, the government must prove, with precision, the value of the property stolen. Comber v. United States, D.C.App., 398 A.2d 25 (1979). … See Johnson v. United States, supra.

Williams v. City Stores Company

192 A.2d 534 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 1963

Italian Star Line v. United States Shipping Board E. F. Corporation, 2nd Cir., 53 F.2d 359, 361 , 80 A.L.R. 576 . … Oscanyan v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co., 103 U.S. 261, 263 , 26 L.Ed. 539 ; Brown v. District of Columbia, 29 App.D.C. 273 , 25 L.R.A.,N.S., 98.

United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corp. Ex Rel. United States v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.

98 F.2d 238 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 1938

Co. v. … Co. v. Fruin-Colnon Cont. Co., 8 Cir., 32 F.2d 425 ; Bank v. South Jacksonville v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., supra; National City Bank v. National Security Co., supra; Murray v. American Surety Co., supra; Gordon v. Mass.

Orius Telecommunications, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

857 A.2d 1061 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2004

See Imes v. Georgia Brown’s Rest., Dir. Dkt. No. 99 — 44, 2000 D.C. Wrk. Comp. Lexis 253, *3-4 (June 27, 2000) (holding that the receipt rule applies to § 32-1515©) (citing Dorsey v. ITT/Cont’l Baking, Dir. Dkt. … Louis v. Alverno Coll., 744 F.2d 1314 , 1316 n. 4 (7th Cir.1984); Bell v. Brown, 181 U.S.App. D.C. 226, 233 & n. 60, 557 F.2d 849 , 856 & n. 60 (1977); Aberson v.

United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

449 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 17, 2006

United States v. Philip Morris, No. 1:99-CV-2496, Order # 280 at ¶ 6 (D.D.C. Dec. 11, 2002). G. Brown & Williamson 493. … Food and Drug Admin. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 138 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000).

Brian A. Brown AKA Bryant Brown v. U.S Government

946 F.2d 1563 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 10, 1991

BROWN aka Bryant Brown v. U.S GOVERNMENT. No. 90-5200. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. May 10, 1991. Before SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. … See District of Columbia v.

United Transportation Union-Illinois Legislative Board v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America

52 F.3d 1074 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 25, 1995

Redden v. ICC, 956 F.2d 302, 304 (D.C.Cir.1992); Fox Valley & Western, Ltd. v. ICC, 15 F.3d 641 , 644 (7th Cir.1994). … New York Dock Ry. v.

United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. National Labor Relations Board

462 F.2d 298 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 1972

Highland Supply Corp. v. Reynolds Metals Co., 327 F.2d 725, 729 (8th Cir. 1964). See also Dick v. New York Life Ins. Co., 359 U.S. 437, 445 , 79 S.Ct. 921 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 935 (1959). … See, e. g., Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, Local 4-243 v. N.L.R.B., 124 U.S.App.D. *301 C. 113, 115, 362 F.2d 943, 945 (1966); Warehousemen & Mail Order Employees, Local 743, I.B.T. etc. v.

Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Mohawk Airlines, Inc., and Command Airways, Inc., Intervenors. Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Mohawk Airlines, Inc., and Air North, Inc., Intervenors. Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board

458 F.2d 846 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 1972

AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Mohawk Airlines, Inc., and Air North, Inc., Intervenors. AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner, v. … orders. 10 Western Air Lines v.

Gregory A. Davis v. United States of America, Leroy Johnson v. United States of America, Alphonzo M. Brown v. United States

409 F.2d 453 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 1969

Compare United States v. Daniels, 377 F.2d 255 (6th Cir. 1967). … Bee Weaver v. United States, 133 U.S. App.D.C. -, 408 F.2d 1269 (1969). 10 . As to robbery, see Weaver v. United States, cited supra note 9.

Singley v. United States

533 A.2d 245 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 5, 1987

Harris v. United States, 430 A.2d 536, 542 (D.C. 1981); see also (Raymond) Smith v. … States v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463, 474 , 100 S.Ct. 1244, 1251 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980); see also Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519 , 72 S.Ct. 509 , 96 L.Ed. 541 (1952); Ker v.

Raven v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2018

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). To avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” … Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). Yet the ultimate standard remains the same.

Meat Hwy. Drivers, Etc., U. L. v. National Labor Relations Board

348 F.2d 803 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 6, 1965

Meat and Highway Drivers, Dockmen, etc. v. … See Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413, etc. v. N.L.R.B., 118 U.S.App.D.C. 149 , 158, 334 F.2d 539 , 548 (1964). 6 So ordered. 1 73 STAT. 543, 29 U.S.C. 158(e)