Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,602 results
1.61s
CJC v. Corporation of Catholic Bishop
985 P.2d 262 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1999
Where childhood sexual abuse is at issue, even long established privileges do not apply. See, e.g., State v. … First Amendment concerns are clearly at issue.
Cited 185 timesPublished94 Wash. 2d 387 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1980
(dissenting) — The majority concedes that the petitioner's crimes qualify him for the status of habitual criminal under RCW 9.92.090. It also concedes that the United States Supreme Court, in affirming Rummel v. … And punishment is grossly disproportionate only if the conduct should never be proscribed or if the punishment is clearly arbitrary and shocking to the sense of justice.
Cited 142 timesPublishedWash. Local Etc. v. Internat'l Etc.
33 Wash. 2d 1 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1949
HUGHES: You had better qualify that `any place'. You mean any reasonable place? THE WITNESS: Yes, any reasonable place. … It is clearly established in the record that there were no trials conducted at the Stratford hotel.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJeff Kirby, Apps. v. State Of Wa, Dept Of Employment Security, Resp.
Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 10, 2014
On July 9, 2011, the Department issued a determination notice denying her request for benefits because she was fired for work misconduct and therefore did not qualify for benefits. … This conclusion is supported by the ALJ's factual findings, which are unchallenged on appeal, and PSS fails to show the ALJ's ruling is clearly erroneous.
Cited 0 timesPublished169 Wash. 2d 633 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 2, 2010
Furthermore, adjudication of this issue shall be based on the findings of a "professionally qualified person." *1156 ¶ 32 4. … Coleman, clearly do not believe in the SVP statute, it is the legislature that must write laws that meet strict scrutiny, not Dr. Coleman.
Cited 6 timesPublishedWilliams v. Washington State Department of Corrections
District Court, W.D. Washington · Mar 5, 2025
“It is well-established that, among the rights they retain, prisoners have a First 14 Amendment right to file prison grievances. … Retaliation against prisoners for their exercise of this 15 right is itself a constitutional violation, and [is] prohibited as a matter of clearly established law.” 16 Brodheim v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCheesman v. DSHS Region 1/DCFS Childrens Administration
District Court, E.D. Washington · Aug 15, 2019
The record is not clear as to 20 the outcome of the criminal charges. 21 Plaintiffs’ Section 1983 Claims 22 In order to establish a claim … Defendant Snyder is not entitled to qualified immunity on this claim. 26 As set forth above, the law is well-established that judicial authorization for a 27 purely investigatory examination must be obtained after notice
Cited 0 timesUnknownState Of Washington, V. Jeremy Michael Santiago
Court of Appeals of Washington · Aug 2, 2021
The felony firearm charge to which Santiago agreed to plead guilty did not qualify for community custody supervision. … The State is attempting to shift the burden to Santiago, ignoring the wealth of case law clearly establishing that the burden of proving up criminal history for purposes of sentencing lies squarely with the State.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMayer v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.
909 P.2d 1323 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Feb 9, 1996
Agreement and by the Bureau's Bylaws. [2] As support, he cites two principles of general contract construction: (1) when there is an inconsistency between a general and a specific provision, the specific provision ordinarily qualifies … Although clearly applicable to the circumstances in this case, Mayer concedes that this legislation did not take effect until 1993, one year after the Bureau cancelled the Preferred Participant Agreement.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · Jul 12, 2023
Additionally, it is well established that judges 19 are absolutely immune from liability for their judicial acts. In re Castillo, 297 F.3d 940, 947 (9th 20 Cir. 2002) (internal citations omitted). … Absolute immunity only fails to attach where judicial 21 officers act clearly and completely outside the scope of their jurisdiction. Demoran v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSatomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLC
167 Wash. 2d 781 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 24, 2009
. ¶26 The FAA’s displacement of conflicting state law is “now well-established.” Allied-Bruce, 513 U.S. at 272 ; *801 Adler, 153 Wn.2d at 344 (“[T]he FAA clearly preempts any state law to the contrary.”). … It does not apply to any of these cases, however, because it governs only “qualified warranties” of condominiums.
Cited 137 timesPublished141 P.3d 67 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jul 31, 2006
an adequate alternative forum even though that jurisdiction does not allow recovery for pain and suffering, or for lost and future earnings: [T]he fact that a particular claim cannot be raised in a foreign forum does not establish … We note that the letter was not competent evidence of Canadian law, since the insurance adjuster was not shown to be qualified to give an expert opinion on that subject. ER 702; Sehlin v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St.
Cited 11 timesPublished109 Wash. 2d 896 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1988
The stop was clearly beyond the scope of a Terry stop. Admission of the tainted evidence was not harmless error. … Fehr's vehicle, at some time during that stop probable cause was established.
Cited 52 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · Aug 8, 2025
Aguda’s complaint because it failed to establish 23 a basis for this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction, establish a waiver of the United States … ’ 24 1 sovereign immunity, or state a claim.
Cited 0 timesUnknownState Of Washington, V. Matthew Michael Heleniak
Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 23, 2025
It is well established that “[a] plea agreement is a contract between the State and the defendant.” State v. MacDonald, 183 Wn.2d 1, 8, 346 P.3d 748 (2015). … In contrast, the prosecutor in this case used the qualifying phrase “at least” only once during the sentencing hearing rather than repeatedly like in Williams.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedShannahan v. Internal Revenue Service
680 F. Supp. 2d 1270 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Jan 4, 2010
information and qualifies as a statute that exempts disclosure within the meaning of Exemption 3. … Shannahan’s arguments, Agent Beilis clearly sets out the basis for his belief that release of these documents would compromise the informant.
Cited 2 timesPublishedChinook Indian Nation v. Zinke
326 F. Supp. 3d 1128 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Jun 20, 2018
Federal acknowledgment is particularly significant because such recognition "affords important rights and protections to Indian tribes, including limited sovereign immunity, powers of self-government, the right to control … They state clearly what the law is." Id. Plaintiffs' effort to distinguish Shinnecock 's discussion of the List Act's Congressional findings is a strained and ultimately unpersuasive reading of that case.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBatcheller v. Town of Westport
39 Wash. 2d 338 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1951
The rule that the findings of fact of the trial court, made upon conflicting evidence in an action at law, will not *352 be disturbed unless the evidence clearly preponderates against them, is so well established as to require … Thus, the ultimate question is whether the evidence clearly preponderates against the trial court’s finding that the system as planned by appellants could not be built within the available funds.
Cited 6 timesPublished981 P.2d 443 · Washington Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1999
In contrast, we have never before held that accomplice liability qualifies as an alternative means of committing a single offense also presented on the basis of principal liability. … Clearly, that standard was met in this case.
Cited 116 timesPublished116 Wash. App. 876 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 13, 2003
One of the initiative’s primary purposes was to establish campaign contribution limits and to reduce the influence of large organizational contributors. RCW 42.17.620. … When read together with its related statutory subsec *884 tions, 4 RCW 42.17.660(2) clearly provides that where any subunit of a corporation or labor union makes a political campaign contribution, this contribution is considered
Cited 18 timesPublished
Ask Donna