Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersTN

10,000+ results

5.64s

  • United States v. Sims

    201 F. Supp. 405 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jan 16, 1962

    International Paper Co. v. United States, 227 F.2d 201, 205 (5th Cir. 1955). … United States v. Di Re, 332 U.S. 581, 593 , 68 S.Ct. 222 , 92 L.Ed. 210 (1948).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Shelby County Sheriff's Department v. Mark Lowe

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 11, 2008

    s determinations be filed within thirty (30) days of the Board’s order.3 Case v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. John M. Banks

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 25, 2020

    Brown was lying on the couch when he heard something at the front door. He said that Ms. Atkins was outside smoking, and everyone else was in bed. Mr. Brown stood up and heard additional noises. … Brown’s cell phone and his wallet containing forty dollars. Mr. Brown testified that the three men left the residence through the side door when police sirens were heard. He did not know any of the individuals.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lingner v. Lingner

    165 Tenn. 525 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1933

    Hackney v. … We agree with the chancellor that Hackney v. Hackney, supra, fully sustained his first decree. In that case the bill prayed for a divorce from bed and board.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Guatemala, Concepion v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

    2022 TN WC 11 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 8, 2022

    Eaves v. Ametek, Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 53, at *8-9 (Sept. 14, 2018). … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Acute Care Holdings, LLC v. Houston County, Tennessee

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 3, 2019

    .; -6- Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50 (Tenn. 1997). … Godfrey v. Ruiz, 90 S.W.3d 692, 695 (Tenn. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hardy v. State

    519 S.W.2d 400 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 17, 1974

    The rule governing here is set forth in Burum v. State, 1 Tenn.Cr.App. 508, 445 S.W.2d 946 . … The facts in this case are that the purchase made by one agent was of brown heroin, while the purchase made by the other was white.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hunt v. Hunt

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 27, 2000

    See Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d at 168; Mahaffey v. Mahaffey, 775 S.W.2d 618, 622 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989); Hardin v. Hardin, 689 S.W.2d 152, 154 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). The principle basis for Ms. … See Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d at 169; Ingram v. Ingram, 721 S.W.2d 262, 264 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sonney Summers v. RTR Transportation Services

    Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 28, 2022

    Summers argued before the Appeals Board that Gentry and Reynolds were wrongly decided and are inconsistent with Jones v. … Summers v. RTR Transp. Serv., 2020-05-0875, 2021 WL 6119551, at *4 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Dec. 22, 2021). The Appeals Board went on to explain that it was Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Seay v. Knox County Quarterly Court

    541 S.W.2d 946 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1976

    From these facts it appears that the Knox County Quarterly *947 Court and Beer Board adopted the two thousand (2,000) foot rule on February 22, 1974. … We said in Serv-U-Mart Inc. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Michael Tucker

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 20, 2002

    Brown reported that he then saw someone pull out a gun and shoot the victim, and the victim fell. According to Brown, after the victim fell, Brown was able to see more clearly. … State v. Buggs, 995 S.W.2d 102, 105 (Tenn. 1999); Liakas v. State, 286 S.W.2d 856, 859 (Tenn. 1956).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ricks v. State

    882 S.W.2d 387 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 16, 1994

    The Board of Paroles found that the appellant had violated the commutation; and the Board recommended that the commutation be revoked. … Collins v. State, 550 S.W.2d at 650 ; Bowen v. State, 488 S.W.2d at 375 . 15 . Collins v. State, 550 S.W.2d at 650 ; Bowen v. State, 488 S.W.2d at 375-376. 16 . See White v. State, 717 S.W.2d at 310 . 17 .

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Jones, Kenneth M. v. Valero Memphis Refinery

    2024 TN WC 37 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 25, 2024

    Jones’s claim to temporary disability benefits, the Appeals Board laid out the requirements for eligibility for these benefits in Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Townsend, Timothy v. Universal Forest Products

    2024 TN WC 5 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 7, 2024

    Scott v. Integrity Staffing Sols., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). He must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he is entitled to the requested benefits. Tenn. … See the Rules governing the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board on the Bureau’s website If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s Order will become final by operation of law thirty

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Erskine Johnson

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 12, 1999

    No fingerprints belonging to Eric Brown or Michael Brown were found on the car. … See California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538, 541, 107 S.Ct. 837, 839, 93 L.Ed.2d 934 (1987); Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 113-15, 102 S.Ct. 869, 876-77, 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982). ?

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Larry E. Parrish

    Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 8, 2021

    .”); Hornbeck v. Bd. of Pro. Resp., 545 S.W.3d 386, 392 n.12 (Tenn. 2018) (same); Bailey v. Bd. of Pro. Resp., 441 S.W.3d 223, 231 n.13 (Tenn. 2014) (same); Mabry v. Bd. of Pro. … Effler v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baker v. State

    951 S.W.2d 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 20, 1997

    The fact that the Board of Paroles determines the granting or denial of parole does not violate the separation of powers doctrine. The authority to grant paroles is not judicial in nature but is administrative. Woods v. … See Doyle v. Hampton, 207 Tenn. 399 , 340 S.W.2d 891 (1960). This issue has no merit.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Carter v. Beeler

    188 Tenn. 328 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1949

    (Citing authorities) Bell v. Hart, 143 Tenn. 587 , 223 S. W. 996 . In Davis v. Hailey, 143 Tenn. 247, 252 , 227 S. … Berry v. Shelby County, 139 Tenn. 532, 201 S. W. 748 ; Patterson v. Washington County, 136 Tenn. 60 , 188 S. W. 613 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Antonio Wyatt 291749 v. Tennessee Department of Correction

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 24, 2013

    S TANDARD OF R EVIEW The disciplinary board’s action is reviewed through the common-law writ of certiorari. Rhoden v. State Dep’t of Corr., 984 S.W.2d 955 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). … P. 13(d); Whaley v. Perkins, 197 S.W.3d 665, 670 (Tenn. 2006); Union Carbide Corp. v. Huddleston, 854 S.W.2d 87, 91 (Tenn. 1993). III. D ISCUSSION Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rhea County v. Town of Graysville

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 18, 2002

    As recognized by the Court in State v. … Brown, 795 S.W.2d 689 (Tenn.Cr.App. 1990) at page 698: Failure of a defendant to cite authority for propositions in his argument on appeal constitutes waiver of the issue. State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.