Case law

Civil Rights Division of Bureau of Labor v. Williams

280 Or. 595 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1977

The court said, citing Phillips v. … Fairview Hospital v. Stanton, 28 Or App 643 , 560 P2d 667 (1977), overruled Thompson v. Secretary of State, 19 Or App 74 , 526 P2d 621 (1974), and Phillips v.

Hansen v. Oregon Humane Society

142 Or. 104 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1933

of the board present at any meeting”. … In Wells v.

Fernandez v. M & M REFORESTATION

124 Or. App. 38 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 20, 1993

See Grable v. Weyerhaeuser Company, 291 Or 387 , 631 P2d 768 (1981). … In Harris v.

Pilling v. Travelers Ins. Co. (In re Pilling)

289 Or. App. 715 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 4, 2018

See Rubalcaba v. Nagaki Farms, Inc. , 333 Or. 614 , 43 P.3d 1106 (2002) (describing test); Woody v. Waibel , 276 Or. 189 , 554 P.2d 492 (1976) (same). … Hayes v.

Hanna v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

65 Or. App. 649 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 23, 1983

He assigns as error the Board’s admission of two exhibits, which were not admitted at the hearing, and the Board’s finding that he is not permanently and totally disabled. We reverse and reinstate the referee’s order. … Morris v. Denny’s, 50 Or App 533 , 623 P2d 1118 (1981); Butcher v. SAIF, 45 Or App 313 , 608 P2d 575 (1980).

Cain v. Woolley Enterprises

301 Or. 650 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1986

The Court of Appeals denied claimant’s motion to have the court either hear the evidence or remand to the referee and affirmed the Board without opinion. We allowed review in this case and in Compton v. … The court denied claimant’s motion and affirmed the Board without opinion. As we said in Compton v.

SAIF Corp. v. Walker

330 Or. 102 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 16, 2000

See Stepp v. … Next, in Gwynn v.

In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Dresie

16 Or. App. 687 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 18, 1974

In Howser v. … Hurner v. Hurner, 179 Or 349, 357 , 170 P2d 720 (1946). * * *’ Watson v. Watson, 251 Or 65, 66-67 , 444 P2d 476 (1968).” With specific reference to the problem confronting the trial judge here, we said in Brown v.

OR-OSHA v. Loy Clark Pipeline, Co.

320 Or. App. 205 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 8, 2022

See State v. … Id.; see also Murphy v. Oregon Medical Board, 270 Or App 621, 631, 348 P3d 1173 (2015) (notice did not provide adequate notice of statutory bases for discipline); Villanueva v.

Babcock v. Employment Division

25 Or. App. 661 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 1976

Geraths v. Employment Division, 24 Or App 201 , 544 P2d 1066 (1976); Romanosky v. Employment Div., 21 Or App 785, 536 P2d 1277 (1975); Georgia-Pacific v. Employment Div., 21 Or App 135, 533 P2d 829 (1975). … App. 638, 641 , 95 N.E.2d 214 ; Boynton Cab Co. v. Giese (1941), 237 Wisc. 237, 296 N.W. 630 . * * *” 147 Ind App at 44. Geraths was decided by this court after the decision in this case was handed down by the board.

SAIF Corp. v. Traner

273 Or. App. 310 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 2015

In the principal case, SAIF v. … In Saxton v.

Goodsell v. Eagle-Air Estates Homeowners Ass'n

249 Or. App. 639 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 9, 2012

On appeal, reversed and remanded; cross-appeal dismissed as moot. 1 See, e.g., Morgan v. Goodsell, 198 Or App 385 , 108 P3d 612 (2005); Morgan v. … Goodsell, 198 Or App 533 , 109 P3d 803 , rev den, 339 Or 406 (2005); Morgan v. Goodsell, 220 Or App 329 , 185 P3d 1117 (2008); Eagle-Air Estates Homeowners Assn. v.

SAIF Corp. v. Frias

169 Or. App. 345 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 23, 2000

similar version of the rule comported with the legislative intent of ORS 656.210(2)(b)(A) that “ ‘[t]he benefits of a worker who incurs an injury shall be based on the wage of the worker at the time of injury.’ ” Hadley v. … ORS 656.210(2) delegates no authority to the Board to do otherwise. Id. at 161 . We interpret administrative rules according to their plain meaning, considering the text of the rule in context. SAIF v.

Vega v. Express Services

144 Or. App. 602 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 27, 1996

Our review of the Board’s determination of whether an employer has unreasonably withheld compensation under ORS 656.262(10) was explained in our decision in Tattoo v. … If the Board uses the correct legal standard, then we review its finding about reasonableness for substantial evidence.” (Citations omitted.) See also Dawes v.

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy

159 Or. App. 44 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 17, 1999

Jensen v. Conagra, Inc., 152 Or App 449 , 954 P2d 822 (1998); 2 Volk v. America West *49 Airlines, 135 Or App 565 , 899 P2d 746 (1995), rev den 322 Or 645 (1996). … The dissent contends that our decision in this case should be controlled by our holdings in Shaw v. Rebholz, 152 Or App 328 , 954 P2d 190 (1998) and Santos v. Caryall Transport, 152 Or App 322 , 954 P2d 187 (1998).

Glennen v. Employment Division

25 Or. App. 593 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 1, 1976

Stevenson v. Morgan, 17 Or App 428 , 522 P2d 1204 (1974); Cantrell v. Employment Division, 24 Or App 215 , 545 P2d 143 , Sup Ct review denied (1976). … Under these circumstances we affirm the board’s decision.

Pohrman v. Klamath County Commissioners

25 Or. App. 613 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 1976

This is a landowner’s appeal from a zoning decision of the Klamath County Board of Commissioners (Board). Plaintiff owns an interest in about 3400 acres purchased in 1970. … Clackamas Co. v. Holmes, 265 Or 193, 199 , 508 P2d 190 (1973).

Neal v. Maass

94 Or. App. 119 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 23, 1988

Strong v. Gladden, 225 Or 345, 351 , 358 P2d 520 (1961); Jamison v. Cupp, 27 Or App 109, 111 , 555 P2d 475 (1976). Because we conclude that there is jurisdiction, we address the issue raised by petitioner. … Petitioner points out that the parole board set his initial release date at 120 months.

Cascade Steel Rolling Mills v. Madril

62 Or. App. 598 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 13, 1983

On the merits, and without indulging in a lengthy recitation of the medical evidence, see Bowman v. … See Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, supra, 57 Or App at 402 ; Green v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 197 Or 160 , 251 P2d 437 , 252 P2d 545 (1953). Affirmed.

Howerton v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

70 Or. App. 99 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 26, 1984

Claimant first argues that the Board’s guidelines are invalid, because they arbitrarily assign positive and negative points for each factor. 2 We disagree. See Fraijo v. Fred N. … See Fraijo v. Fred N. Bay News Co., supra, 59 Or App at 269 ; accord Harwell v. Argonaut Ins. Co., 296 Or 505, 510 , 678 P2d 1202 (1984).