Case law

Meads v. Human

84 Okla. 82 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1921

If said board finds said applicant is of good moral character and upon presenting his diploma with verification and identification, and when said 'board shall be satisfied, as to such matters, it shall register said applicant … J., PITCHEORD, V. C. J., and McNEILL and NICHOLSON, J.T.. concur.

Massengale v. State

556 P.2d 282 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 1976

In Davis v. … Brown v. State, Okl.Cr., 481 P.2d 475 (1971). . . .”

Shires v. Reynolds

203 Okla. 573 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1950

Morningside Hospital & Training School for Nurses v. Carmichael, County Treasurer, 185 Okla. 48 , 89 P. 2d 958 ; Tulsa Exchange Co. et al. v. … In the case of Perkins v.

State v. Breckenridge, Superior Judge

43 Okla. 711 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 17, 1914

Herndon v. Hammond, 28 Okla. 616 , 115 Pac. 775 ; Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Bartlesville, 27 Okla. 214 , 111 Pac. 207 ; Leedy v. Brown, 27 Okla. 489 , 113 Pac. 177 ; State ex rel. Attorney General v. … S.) 380; Morrison v. Brown, 26 Okla. 201, 109 Pac. 237 . Even if the trial court had been without jurisdiction of the cause, there is another reason why the writ should not issue at this time.

Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. McCurdy

86 Okla. 148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 1922

The county excise board has nothing to do with making an estimate for the expenditure of this fund, for the obvious reason the statute does not vest the board with any discretion in the matter, but specifically provides how … Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company v. Johnson, Treasurer, 85 Okla. 161 , 204 Pac. 910 ; St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bockoven, County Treasurer, 75 Okla. 145 , 182 Pac. 507 . The case of F. A. Gillespie v.

Kakkanatt v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

183 P.3d 1032 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 2008

Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security Commission, 1985 OK 21, 112 , 697 P.2d 583, 537 , citing Boynton Cab Company v. … Navickas v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 567 Pa. 298 , 787 A.2d 284 (2001).

Protest of First Nat. Bank of Guthrie

136 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 1929

State v. Board of Examiners (Mont.) 104 Pac. 1055 .” And this was the use made of the word in Re Shirley, 122 Okla. 109 . 251 Pac. 736 . … Sometimes the excise board would certify a tax rate in excess of that authorized by law. This court had from time to time held that such acts made the tax rate illegal. Albrecht v. Jones, 132 Okla. 277 , 267 Pac. 270 .

Gillette, Libby v. Murphy, Carroll, Brough

7 Okla. 91 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1898

Jackson, V. D. Tinklepaugh, and the board of county commissioners co-defendants with Gillette & Libby. … Y. 454 ; McFadden v. Wilson, 96 Ind. 253 ; Macomber v. Doane, 2 Allen, 541 ; Tripp v.

Territory of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Taylor v. Caffrey

8 Okla. 193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 11, 1899

of equalization, was 23 per cent, upon the valuations returned by the county board of equalization of said county; that the increase made and ordered by the territorial board upon said property and upon the property in the … (Koehler v. Ball, 2 Kan. 160; Lender v. Caldwell, 4 Kan. 339 ; Wood v. Nicholson, 43 Kan. 461 , 23 Pac. 587 ; Johnson v. Johnson, 54 Kan. 726 , 39 Pac. 725 ; Sawyer v. Bryson, 10 Kan. 201 ; Hume v. Robinson, [Colo.

ANAGNOST v. TOMECEK

390 P.3d 707 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 2017

Anagnost, on December 12, 2014, filed an amended petition, asserting additional claims and added the Board and certain Board members as defendants. … In Cole v.

Hartford Fire Ins. v. Union Graded School Dist. No. 73

121 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1926

In Wiley v. London & Lancashire, Fire Ins. Co. … Cone v. Century Fire Ins. Co. (Iowa) 117 N. W. 308 ; Weigan v. Council Bluffs Ins. Co. (Iowa) 73 N. W. 862 ; Cronenwett et al. v. Iowa Underwriters of Dubuque Fire & Marine Insurance Co. et. al. (Cal.

Rose Hill Burial Park v. Garrison

176 Okla. 355 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 1936

Crown Drug Co. v. Hofstrom, 158 Okla. 27 , 12 P. (2d) 519 ; Drumright Feed Co. v. Hunt, 90 Okla. 277 , 217 P. 491 .” In Mobley v. … Maryland Casualty Co. v. State Industrial Commission, 141 Okla. 202 , 284 P. 644 ; Ingram Drug Co. v. O’Brien, 164 Okla. 228 , 23 P. (2d) 642 , and Republic Supply Co. v.

Williams v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

66 O.B.A.J. 2352 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 2, 1995

In District Court v. … Furthermore, we agree with the reasoning of District Court v. Board of Review and Taylor v. State ex rel.

Roller v. State

95 Okla. Crim. 87 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 16, 1952

Ryals v. State, 84 Okla. Cr. 114 , 179 P. 2d 482 ; Bouziden v. State, 78 Okla. Cr. 387 , 149 P. 2d 99 ; Davidson v. State, 82 Okla. Cr. 152 , 167 P. 2d 381 . In Brown v. State, 84 Okla. … “In Brown v.

Best v. Evans

297 P.2d 379 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 3, 1956

Owens, 125 Okl. 66 , 256 P. 704 , 52 A.L.R. 1270 ; and Brown v. State, 178 Okl. 506 , 62 P.2d 1208 . Art. … Short v. Martin, supra; State ex. rel. Short v. Owens, supra; and Brown v.

Enid City Ry. Co. v. Reynolds

34 Okla. 405 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1912

the south, preparatory to alighting, the conductor took hold of her arm, which gave her *408 sufficient support to steady her, but which was all the support she had, and that just in the act of stepping out onto the foot-board … McMaster v. Bank, 23 Okla. 550 , 101 Pac. 1103 , 138 Am. St. Rep. 831 ; Finch v. Brown, 27 Okla. 217 , 111 Pac. 391 ; Ellet-Kendall Shoe Co. v. Ross, 28 Okla. 697 , 115 Pac. 892 ; Pioneer Telegraph & Telephone Co. v.

York v. State Industrial Commission

201 Okla. 636 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 19, 1949

In Tulsa Hotel et al. v. Sparks et al., supra, in referring to and discussing the above-quoted case, we said: “Claimant therefore states that his claim was timely filed under the rule announced in Brown & Root, Inc., v. … v.

Ex Parte Smith

49 Okla. 716 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1916

In Town of Grove v. … .” *725 In Guernsey v.

Daniel v. Bound

184 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1938

See State v. Tomlinson, 20 Kan. 692 ; Alexander v. Pharr (N. C.) 103 S. E. 8 . … See Burchell v. State Board of Election Commissioners, 252 Ky. 823 ; Keogh v. Horner, 8 Fed. Supp. (D. C.) 933. The appeal is dismissed. OSBORN, C. X, BAYLESS, Y. C.

Edwards v. School District No. 222

117 Okla. 269 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1925

In the case of Ray v. … In the case of Fairbanks-Morse Co. v.