Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.16s
62 Or. App. 395 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 1983
ORS 19.010(2)(c); Kuvaas v. Cutrell, 50 Or App 529 , 623 P2d 1116 (1980). Appeal dismissed.
Cited 0 timesPublished231 F. Supp. 2d 1011 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 26, 2001
Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971). It does not necessarily mean a preponderance. Smolen v. Chater, 80 F.3d 1273, 1279 (9th Cir.1996) (citing Sor-enson v. … (Tr. 56). *1017 See Fair v.
Cited 0 timesPublished23 Or. 541 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1893
It is essential to the proper execution of a deed or mortgage by a corporation, that it be done in the name of and on behalf of the corporation, and under its corporate seal: Devlin, Deeds, § 334; Eagle Woolen Mills Co. v. … Helens Mill Co. 3 Saw. 88 ; Brinley v. Mann,, 2 Cush. 337 . The mortgage in this case is not executed, nor does it purport to be executed, by or in behalf of the Farmers’ Supply Depot Company. It is executed by F. S.
Cited 1 timesPublished34 Or. App. 699 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 30, 1978
State v. Bussey, 34 Or App 535 , 579 P2d 264 (1978), and ORS 161.665(3).
Cited 0 timesPublished26 Or. App. 13 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 19, 1976
Mays v. Shields, 251 Or 168, 170-71 , 444 P2d 949 (1968). Plaintiff also contends that he is being held illegally since he was never arrested pursuant to the second warrant of extradition. … State v. Marling, 19 Or App 811 , 529 P2d 957 (1974), Sup Ct review denied (1975).
Cited 0 timesPublished30 Or. App. 647 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 17, 1977
Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or 485 , 443 P2d 621 (1968). 1 Affirmed. The issue raised by the state in Penrod v. Cupp, 30 Or App 371 , 567 P2d 563 (1977), is not raised here.
Cited 0 timesPublished237 Or. 23 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1964
. *28 In Mooney v. Holcomb, 15 Or 639 , Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublished202 Or. 393 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1954
That such a decree may not be so attacked is settled in the case of Shaveland v. Shaveland, 112 Or 173 , 228 P 1090 . Affirmed. Neither party to recover costs or disbursements.
Cited 0 timesPublished80 Or. App. 464 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 30, 1986
As we explained in Quinn v. … Motor Trucking Co. v.
Cited 6 timesPublished19 Or. 288 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 19, 1890
Dore v. … The objection to the affidavit does not fall within Stark v. Stafford, 14 Or. 317 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedBerliner v. Brown, Doria & Hill
221 Or. 475 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1960
In October, 1955, plaintiff obtained judgment against the corporation and Brown and Doria. … Attention is also directed to the entire opinion of this court in Leonard v. King, 128 Or 216 , 274 P 116 . Affirmed.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Adult & Family Services
48 Or. App. 232 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1980
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Zimbrick Logging, Inc.
273 Or. 463 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1975
Sterrett v. Hurlburt et al, 129 Or 520, 522 , 275 P2d 689 (1929). … “It is sufficient, if from proximate estimates of witnesses, a satisfactory conclusion can be reached * * Brown v. McCloud, 96 Or 549, 552 , 190 P 578 (1920). Accord, Buck v.
Cited 3 timesPublished251 Or. 150 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1968
In Bennet v. … Withnell v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBrown Contracting, Inc. v. ODOT
317 Or. App. 650 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 16, 2022
650 Argued and submitted January 6, 2021, affirmed February 16, 2022 BROWN CONTRACTING, INC., an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … We have reached that conclusion after having reviewed the summary judg- ment record, drawing all reasonable inferences in Brown’s favor, Whalen v.
Cited 0 timesPublished61 Or. App. 8 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 1982
McClory v. … See Hellbusch v. Rheinholdt, 275 Or 307 , 550 P2d 1199 (1976); Rhodes v. Moore, 239 Or 454 , 398 P2d 189 (1965); Silver Falls Co. v. E & W Lbr. Co., 149 Or 126 , 40 P2d 703 (1935).
Cited 5 timesPublishedBrown v. Adult & Family Services
293 Or. 395 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1982
Following our decision in Brown v. … It was from that decision we allowed review and consolidated the case for argument and decision with other cases in Brown v. Adult and Family Services, supra.
Cited 3 timesPublished181 Or. 279 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1947
Hamilton v. Finch, 166 Or. 156, 172 , 109 P. (2d) 852 , 111 P. (2d) 81 . Anderson v. … See Lawry v. McKennie, 177 Or. 604, 164 P. (2d) 444 ; LaVigne v. LaVigne, 176 Or. 634 , 158 P. (2d) 557 ; Ross v. Hayes, 176 Or. 225 , 157 P. (2d) *287 517, 158 A. L. R. 452; Rauch v. Stecklein, supra.
Cited 5 timesPublished250 Or. App. 132 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 16, 2012
Portland Police Assn v. Civil Service Board, 292 Or 433, 440 , 639 P2d 619 (1982). … Board of Commissioners, 351 Or 219, 240 , 264 P3d 1265 (2011) (context of referred statute includes “statutory framework within which the law was enacted”); English v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Oregon State Penitentiary
22 Or. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 17, 1975
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna