Case law

Rudman v. Leavitt

578 F. Supp. 2d 812 · District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 26, 2008

As Rudman clearly understood, an Alford plea is a guilty plea; the court personally questioned Rudman while he was under oath and determined that he understood the charges and potential consequences of his plea. … Further, the court also established the factual basis for his plea. (R. at 256-272). Accordingly, the court accepted Rudman’s plea as required by Section 1320a — 7(i)(3). 2.

Kreiner v. Dolgencorp, Inc.

841 F. Supp. 2d 897 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jan 30, 2012

The amount of time spent on non-managerial tasks can be misleading when the employee’s managerial functions are "not clearly severable" from the non-managerial functions or are performed simultaneously. … “Although the decisions ... must be of significance, they need not be immune from review, revision, or reversal.” Id.

Gertz v. Maryland Department of the Environment

199 Md. App. 413 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jul 1, 2011

qualifies as a remedial sanction designed to compel future compliance. … Accordingly, the court’s *434 finding that Gertz willfully violated the 2004 Contempt Order is not clearly erroneous. B.

Bundy v. State

95 Md. App. 512 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Apr 1, 1993

Each defendant, moreover, was (and still is) treated as a separate entity in terms of qualifying for the full allotment of peremptories. … The Improbability of Spontaneous Cloning: The construction of the subsection urged upon us by the State, moreover, could work absurd results, clearly not intended by the Legislature.

Lawrence v. State

295 Md. 557 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 24, 1983

Any other result, we think, would establish a rule wholly at odds with the peremptory challenge system as we know it. … Clearly, there is no indication in any of these cases that Swain has been repudiated.

Upman v. Thomey

145 Md. 347 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 5, 1924

The accounts of the trustees very clearly show that these assets of the estate were accounted for and distributed by them.” In Boyd v. … Fox, 121 Md. 194 : “It is firmly established as the law of this State that where an aged parent makes a conveyance to a child, the burden is cast upon the grantee of establishing the fairness of the transaction.

Thorne v. Thorne

70 Md. App. 27 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jan 16, 1987

Thus, he argues “[i]t is impossible to conclude whether the trial judge used the correct standard in what was clearly prosecuted as a criminal contempt ...”. … That finding, on this record, was clearly erroneous. See Turner, supra. Nor can the result be justified on any other basis.

Yacko v. Mitchell

249 Md. App. 640 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Apr 14, 2021

Mitchell sent a “qualified written requests” for information. In total, Ms. Mitchell 12 sent six requests. In her third, dated November 17, 2014, Ms. … Mitchell, the Substitute Trustees were “clearly satisfied with the result.” Further, Ms.

Mayor of Oakland v. Mayor of Mountain Lake Park

392 Md. 301 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 18, 2006

With the annexation statutes clearly designed for orderly process, I believe the adoption of such a rule would be clearly within the contemplation of the statutes’ purposes. … The doctrine of prior jurisdiction has long been established in Missouri.

Nguyen v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 30, 2025

Despite her experience and knowledge of the case, the State did not ask her about the investigation or qualify her as an expert. … On cross-examination, the defense qualified Detective Simpson as an expert in the Department’s “training policies and procedures.”

Greidinger v. Almand

30 F. Supp. 3d 413 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jul 3, 2014

Furthermore, the Act seeks to establish “uniform state tracking procedures ... established to catch deadbeat parents,” which full disclosure of social security numbers would facilitate. … Furthermore, in explaining the reform in its totality, the Committee maintained that the Act was amended “to establish the policy ... that any State may use social security numbers for the purpose of establishing the identification

Hall v. Sullivan

229 F.R.D. 501 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jul 7, 2005

[was] primarily guided by [its] recognition of established and fundamental principals of international law.” Id. … The plain language of the rule requires only that the subpoena be delivered to the person served by a qualified person.

In Re Nathaniel A.

160 Md. App. 581 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jan 3, 2005

Wolfe stated that appellant urged her to declare that Nathaniel’s “disability” qualified her for “SSI” benefits, but she declined to accept the doctor’s advice. Dr. … The incident with the fracture is clearly I find beyond a reasonable doubt if anybody wants me to, which I don’t need to. That was abuse ...

Snyder v. Herbert Greenbaum & Associates, Inc.

38 Md. App. 144 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Dec 7, 1977

Clearly a “lost volume seller” is not in as good a position as if there had been no breach, if he is confined to the § 2-708 (1) formula. … Our holding avoids a result that is clearly “inconsistent with common sense”. Our holding does not, however, dispose of this case.

Edmonds

District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 10, 2026

Maryland Workers Compensation Act (MWCA) Immunity NFI further contends that it is immune from suit because the Contract’s indemnification provision does not include an express waiver of NFI’s worker’s compensation … immunity.

Neal v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland · Nov 27, 2019

“To determine whether conduct qualifies for the discretionary function exception, courts apply a two-pronged test. … Mar. 22, 2013), the court explained that the “Maryland Court [of Appeals] established two factors to be considered in determining whether the evidence is sufficient to establish a jury question for invasion of privacy:

Rosario Rodriguez v. United States

District Court, D. Maryland · Aug 8, 2022

On May 10, 2021, plaintiff filed a claim form, a statement of claim, and a certificate of qualified expert and report signed by Dr. … FTCA Claims The Federal Tort Claims Act waives “the sovereign immunity of the United States for certain torts committed by federal employees acting within the scope

CANELA AND PEREZ v. State

193 Md. App. 259 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jul 1, 2010

Chiafari was qualified in the area of forensic collection was not preserved. See Harmony v. … The opinion at issue was therefore clearly within the field of expertise of a forensic DNA expert. VII.

State v. Mellor

140 Md. 364 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 25, 1922

By chapter 450 of the Acts of 1882, the qualified voters of Howard County were enabled to determine by ballot whether “spirituous, fermented or intoxicating liquors” should be sold in that county, and, their decision being … It applies to him who deals in drugs just as clearly as it does to the keeper of a boarding house, a saloon or restaurant, or a hotel.

Landay v. Board of Zoning Appeals

173 Md. 460 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 13, 1938

A non-conforming use is a use that now exists and that does not comply with the regulations for the use district in which it is *465 established. … That conclusion is qualified of course by the consideration that, as a competent person may give away, throw away, sell, or surrender any property right which he may have, he may also abandon it.