Case law

John F. English v. Board of Monitors and Kirkland Ellis, Hodson, Chaffetz and Masters

282 F.2d 840 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 1960

Upon consideration whereof, it is Ordered by the court that payment by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters of the sum of $18,585.43, to the law firm of Kirkland, Ellis, Hodson, Chaffetz & Masters, employed by the Board … should subsequent consideration of this appeal result in disallowance by this court of any part of said amount the part so disallowed shall be credited upon the amount of fees due for approved legal services rendered to the Board

Teamsters Local 20 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board

610 F.2d 991 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 21, 1979

We, like the Second Circuit, recognize that “the Board knows the facts of life in the labor world better than we ever can.” NLRB v. … We defer to the Board’s “expert knowledge of labor relations” and “ ‘its appraisal of normal conditions about industrial establishments.’ ” NLRB v.

Helvering v. South Penn Oil Co.

68 F.2d 420 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 11, 1933

Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet, 282 U. S. 283 , 51 S. Ct. 140 , 75 L. Ed. 343 ; Burnet v. Chicago Railway Equipment Co., 282 U. S. 295 , 51 S. Ct. 137 , 75 L. Ed. 349 . … In Fleitmann v. Burnet, 62 App. D.

Charles Coles Diggs v. Civil Aeronautics Board, South African Airways, Intervenor

516 F.2d 1248 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1975

PER CURIAM: Petitioners, members of the House of Representatives and four associations who represent the interests of black Americans, appeal from an order of the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB), which authorized South African … Petitioners place their principal reliance on American Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 120 , 348 F.2d 349 (1965), and Pan American World Airways, Inc. v.

Davis v. American Society of Civil Engineers

290 F. Supp. 2d 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 4, 2003

Defendant ASCE’s corporate structure includes a “Board of Direction” (“the Board”), to which the CEO reports, and an Executive Committee (“the Committee”) that exercises the Board’s delegated authority. Id. ¶ 8 . … Brown, 659 F.Supp. 541 , 544 n. 2 (W.D.Mo.1987) (determining that the plaintiffs factual assertions were sufficient to establish proper venue despite direct contradiction by the defendant). B.

Drew v. Ridley

632 A.2d 405 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1993

In Jones v. … See King v. Kidd, Nos. 90-CV-1621, 91-CV-283, 1993 WL 326062 (D.C. Aug. 26, 1993), slip op. at 8-11; Customers Parking, Inc. v.

Hunt v. Miller

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 10, 2020

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC, 139 S.

Hobson v. Hansen

265 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 9, 1967

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 . Defendants concede plaintiffs’ standing to contest the manner in which the Board administers the schools. … Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. [Board of] Police [v. City of Baltimore] Board, 15 Md. 455 .

Phillips v. Kepler

47 App. D.C. 384 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 4, 1918

Mills v. Duryee, 7 Cranch, 481, 482 , 3 L. ed. 411, 412; Hilton v. Buyot, 159 U. S. 113, 182 , 40 L. ed. 95, 114, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 139. … “Alimony decreed to a wife in a divorce of separation from bed and board is as much a debt of record, until the decree has been recalled, as any other judgment for money is.” Barber v.

Cap Santa Vue, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Oscar Nelson, President of Capsanta Vue, Inc., Intervenors. Willis Campbell, Jack N. Smith and Darryl Struthers, D/B/A Valley Manorconvalescent Center v. National Labor Relations Board

424 F.2d 883 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 20, 1970

Brown, 366 U.S. 599, 603-604 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961); Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145, 166-167 , 25 L.Ed. 244 (1878). 12 This principle has been repeatedly applied. … In re Jenison, 267 Minn. 136, 137 , 125 N.W.2d 588, 589 (1963). 39 See also Thomas v. Collins, 323 U.S. 516 , 65 S.Ct. 315 , 89 L.Ed. 430 (1945); West Virginia State Board of Education v.

SWEDISH AMERICAN HOSPITAL v. Sebelius

691 F. Supp. 2d 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 5, 2010

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by *85 mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Local Union No. 715, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

494 F.2d 1136 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 1974

TAMM, Circuit Judge: In Associated Press v. NLRB, 160 U. S.App.D.C.-, 492 F.2d 662 (1974), we endorsed the Labor Board’s Spielberg doctrine. … See Local Union No. 2188, IBEW v. NLRB, 161 U.S. App.D.C. -, at-, 494 F.2d 1087 , at 1090 (1974). 6 . 198 NLRB No. 3 at 5.

New York Mailers' Union No. 6, International Typographical Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

316 F.2d 371 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 14, 1963

National Labor Relations Board, supra; and that other employees are available to handle the work, Los Angeles Mailers Union v. … United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 60 , 64, 294 F.2d 256, 260 (1961). Communications Workers of America v.

Potash Company of Canada Limited v. M/V Raleigh

361 F. Supp. 120 · District Court, Canal Zone · Jul 25, 1973

See Phila., Wilm. and Balt. v. Lehman, 56 Md. 209 ; Central Trust Co. v. East Tennessee Co., D.C., 70 F. 764 ; Thomas v. Lancaster Mills, 71 F. 481 , 19 CCA 88; also Henry Siegel Co., D.C., 223 F. 369 and Hornor v. … In a recent case, Brandon v.

Miller v. ROSENKER

567 F. Supp. 2d 158 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2008

Plaintiff Richard Miller brings this action against Defendant Mark V. … Saltz v. Lehman, 672 F.2d 207, 209 (D.C.Cir.1982).

Kansas State Network, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America

720 F.2d 185 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 25, 1983

Id., citing Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. United States, 157 F.Supp. 939, 943 , 141 Ct.Cl. 38 (1958), and United States v. Morgan, 313 U.S. 409, 422 , 61 S.Ct. 999, 1004 , 85 L.Ed. 1429 (1941). … This case is unlike Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. CAB, 684 F.2d 31 (D.C.Cir. *192 1982), where the Board failed to comply with the Sunshine Act and did not write a contemporaneous statement of reasons.

Iron Workers Local Union No. 167 v. National Labor Relations Board

517 F.2d 183 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 27, 1975

Browne, Kansas City, Mo., filed a brief on behalf of the Glazing Contractors Labor Committee as amicus curiae urging reversal. … (b)(4)(ii)(D) (1970); see NLRB v.

Local Union No. 501, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

756 F.2d 888 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 15, 1985

Workers v. … Helgesen v.

Napper v. United States

22 A.3d 758 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 2011

(Kenneth) Dickerson v. United States, 677 A.2d 509, 512 (D.C.1996) (citation omitted); Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991). … See United States v.

Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418 v. National Labor Relations Board

711 F.2d 348 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1983

Co. v. … Co. v. NLRB, 603 F.2d at 1315-16; Florida Steel Corp. v. NLRB, 601 F.2d at 129 . . See International Union of Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers v.