Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

0.40s

  • State ex rel. V.A.

    212 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 12, 2012

    And, the Attorney General relied on PTI guidelines when establishing the Guidelines for juvenile waiver decisions by prosecutors. See Guidelines, supra, at 4. … Even in such instances, “the prosecutor is not immune from the ban against arbitrariness in governmental decision-making.” State v. Leonardis (Leonardis II), 73 N.J. 360, 377 , 375 A.2d 607 (1977).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • In Re Congoleum Corp.

    362 B.R. 167 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 26, 2007

    Debtors argue that its contributions clearly satisfy the “fair and equitable” standard, or at a minimum raise questions for the finder of facts. … None of those assertions have been established.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Gutin v. Washington Township Board of Education

    467 F. Supp. 2d 414 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 21, 2006

    Rather, the record clearly indicates that Dr. Bickford was only limited to testifying about issues Mr. … The policy clearly provides for testing when a parent consents, as it allows for the parent to select the physician to conduct the medical examination.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • CONTE v. GOODWIN

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 22, 2020

    Third, Defendants assert that they are entitled to qualified immunity as government officials. (Id. at 5–6.) … Finally, qualified immunity, if proven at trial, would constitute a meritorious, complete defense.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kaczorowska v. National Envelope Corp.

    342 N.J. Super. 580 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 1, 2001

    It was established that the device was not used because it hampered the operation of the mill. Id. at 336 , 762 A. 2d 311 . … The instant matter is clearly distinguishable.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • The Palisades at Fort Lee Condominium Association, Inc. v. 100 Old Palisades, LLC

    230 N.J. 427 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 14, 2017

    Having set forth that straightforward standard, the Fox Court added some equitable qualifiers: [I]f a defendant can establish (a) that the lapse of time between the expiration of two years … Clearly, defendants are no worse off in presenting a defense if the six-year limitations period commenced on June 13, 2007, rather than on May 2, 2008.

    Cited 87 timesPublished
  • Endre v. Arnold

    300 N.J. Super. 136 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 24, 1997

    The duty, however, only requires the host to give such assistance as the host reasonably can and to take reasonable *144 action to turn the injured person over to those qualified to care for the guest. … Plaintiff had the burden of establishing defendant’s conduct was a proximate cause of death. See Dawson v.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • DeBartolomeis v. Bd. of Review

    341 N.J. Super. 80 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 23, 2001

    R. 2(3), it merely conforms the rule to established practice. N.J. Evid. … That is clearly proper.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hawthorne v. Odenson

    94 N.J. Eq. 588 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Apr 10, 1923

    provision that words of grant shall import certain covenants is overcome by an express but qualified covenant. … But a second contract is clearly called for.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Del Val Pennysaver, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation

    3 N.J. Tax 164 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 5, 1981

    His testimony was directed primarily to the question of whether the Pennysaver qualifies as a newspaper within the meaning of the statute. … Thus, plaintiffs conclude that the Pennysaver’s activities qualify as adver *172 rising and come within the exemption provided in N.J.S.A. 54:32B-8(ee).

    Reversed on other grounds by DEL VAL PENNYSAVER v. Taxation Div. Director, 188 N.J. Super. 108 (1983)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Eggert v. Tuckerton Volunteer Fire Co. No. 1

    938 F. Supp. 1230 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 4, 1996

    It establishes TVFC as the duly appointed Are department for the Borough. Tuckerton Code, Ord. No. 75 § 10-1 et seq. … This dispute clearly presents a genuine issue of material fact that precludes summary judgment.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • K.S. VS. J.S. (FM-18-0685-15, SOMERSET COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 2020

    Property qualifies for equitable distribution when it is attributable to the expenditure of effort by either spouse during the marriage. Pascale, 140 N.J. at 609. … The burden of establishing the immunity of property from equitable distribution lies with the party seeking exclusion. Id. at 609.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Enourato v. NJ Building Auth.

    182 N.J. Super. 58 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 17, 1981

    Thus, the rules clearly permit a judge to schedule an oral motion to dismiss on short notice. … No such law shall take effect until it shall have been submitted to the people at a general election and approved by a majority of the legally qualified voters of the State voting thereon.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    27 N.J.L. 13 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1858

    In the absence of all conflicting testimony, the documentary evidence establishes the fact that the land conveyed to the canal company was upon the bay, and adjoined the shore line; that the canal, as located and constructed … By the terms of the conveyance the grantees take a qualified fee, liable to be .defeated whenever they cease to use the land for the purpose' specified in the grant/ 1 Inst. 1, b. 27 a; 1 Cruise 79, tit. 1, § 82; 2 Bl.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. May

    362 N.J. Super. 572 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 18, 2003

    fourth-degree crime established in N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4b(5)(b) for his alleged possession of child pornography. … The court excluded that testimony because Wolf had not "been qualified as an expert in determining... age...."

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • WENDY CURRAN VS. KEVIN CURRAN (FM-14-1198-12, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 6, 2020

    Super. 18, 33 (2011), and the burden of establishing that an asset or any portion thereof is immune from distribution falls on the party claiming its immunity, Pacifico v. Pacifico, 190 N.J. 258, 269 (2007). … The burden of establishing a prima facie case of such a change falls on the moving party. See id. at 282.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Doremus v. Bd. of Education of Hawthorne

    5 N.J. 435 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 16, 1950

    No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor … Public officers uniformly qualify by being sworn. The statute (Til. 28, § 453, U. S.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • TERRACE CONDO. ASSO. v. Midlantic Nat. Bank

    268 N.J. Super. 488 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 19, 1993

    The purchaser relies upon his "knowledge and skill, and he impliedly represents that he is qualified to erect a habitable dwelling. He is also in a better position to prevent the existence of major defects." … Midlantic seeks to immunize itself by claiming that it is not a builder with respect to The Terrace and that non-builders cannot be liable for breaches of the implied warranty of reasonable workmanship.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Innes v. Innes

    117 N.J. 496 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 17, 1990

    In that event, the income would clearly be a part of the post-judgment alimony base. … Therefore, the recent amendment immunizes plaintiff’s pension from consideration in alimony-modification determinations. *507 This result is consistent with the legislative intent underlying the recent amendment.

    Cited 124 timesPublished
  • In Re JW

    410 N.J. Super. 125 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 28, 2009

    These mandatory time limits, we believe, were established to balance a Registrant's need for adequate preparation time with the clearly expressed legislative concern in adopting Megan's Law that members of the public receive … There are facts that, in our view, clearly warrant higher static criteria scoring.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.