Case law

Rosewood, Inc. v. Garner

63 Tenn. App. 559 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 15, 1971

Nashville v. State Board of Equalization (1962) 210 Tenn. 587 , 360 S.W.2d 458 . … See: Memphis Chamber *567 of Commerce v. Memphis (1921) 144 Tenn. 291 , 232 S.W. 73 ; Ward Seminary for Young Ladies v. Nashville (1913) 129 Tenn. 412 , 167 S.W. 113 ; Mid-State Baptist Hospital, Inc. v.

State Ex Rel. Robinson v. Hutcheson

180 Tenn. 46 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 8, 1943

S., 593; also, State ex rel. v. Knight, 6 Houst. (11 Del.), 146, and State ex rel. v. … In Curtis v. State, 163 Tenn., 220 , 43 S. W. (2d), 391 , the board of election commissioners, after canvassing the returns filed with them, issued a certificate of election to Fair.

Strickland, Carolyn v. Aramark

2016 TN WC 262 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 4, 2016

) Judge Thomas Wyatt v. ) Ace American Ins. … After the Workers' Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for review.

Adcock v. Houk

122 Tenn. 269 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1909

, for a term of two years, against the new board elected on tbe first Thursday in June, 1909. … Tbe old board was composed of T. J. Adcock, mayor, J. M. Wood, recorder, and Robert Snow, Sam Milwee, Joe Ford, Sam De Armond, Sam Johnson, and F. E. Stanford, aider-men. Tbe new board is composed of M. M.

Vanderbilt Mortgage & Finance v. Joseph Rotello

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 28, 2004

See Staples v. CBL & Assoc., Inc., 15 S.W.3d 83, 88 (Tenn. 2000); Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997); Cowden v. … See Robinson v. Omer, 952 S.W.2d at 426; Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d at 210-11.

State of Tennessee v. Rommel Obligacion

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 15, 2014

Brown’s house, assisting Det. Curtis and Deputy Irvin. … Brown’s residence on April 24, 2009. Upon their arrival, Ms. Brown informed them that nothing had happened. Sometime thereafter, Det. Gilliland arrived. After speaking with Mr.

Clement v. Nichols

186 Tenn. 235 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1948

Railroad Co. v. Brown, 125 Tenn. 351, 354, 359 , 143 S. W. 1129 , is no authority, whatever, for the proposition since it had to do with an amendment in the Trial Court. … Brummitt v. Brown, 159 Tenn. 612 , 21 S. W. (2d) 626 . The remaining three assignments of error are on the following rulings of the Court of Appeals: 1. That the complainants failed to make out a case. 2.

Parks v. Margrave

157 Tenn. 316 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 28, 1928

In the case of Reams v. Board of Mayor and Aldermen of McMinnville, 155 Tenn., 222 , this Court in an opinion delivered by Mr. … Cas., 22 ; Kennedy v. Montgomery County, 98 Tenn., 165 ; Patton v. Chattanooga, 108 Tenn., 222 .

Gosling v. Griffin

85 Tenn. 737 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1875

In Vatterlien v. Howell the material facts were that Howell & Co., on the 10th of March, 1856, executed to E. S. Brown & Co. their promissory note for $208.50, due at six months. … See Carr v. Lewis, 20 N. Y., 138 ; Wheeler v. Guild, 20 Pick., 545 ; Baxter v. Little, 6 Met., 7 ; Edwards on Bills and Notes, marg. 537, 538. Our conclusion is that the case of Vatterlien v.

Mosier v. Thompson

216 Tenn. 655 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1965

The case of Wright v. … T.O.A. sec. 49-105(15) (1964 Supp.). *664 In Board of Education of Memphis City Schools v.

Erwin v. State

116 Tenn. 71 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1905

Buford v. State of Texas, 72 Tex., 182, 184 , 10 S. W., 401 ; Blessing v. City of Galveston, *91 42 Tex., 641, 658 , et seq.; Butner v. Boifeuillet, 100 Ga., 743, 750 , 28 S. E., 464 . … For support of this proposition we are referred to Mayor of Colchester v. Seaber, 3 Burrows, 1866; Milner v. Pensacola, 2 Woods, 632 , Fed. Cas. No. 9, 619; Broughton v. Pensacola, 93 U. S., 266 , 23 L.

Wallwork v. City of Nashville

147 Tenn. 681 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1922

In Browder v. City of Henderson, 182 Ky., 771 , 207 S. … In Watson v. City of Atlanta, 136 Ga., 370 , 71 S.

Pulley v. Tennessee Valley Authority

368 F. Supp. 90 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 4, 1973

See Keim v. United States, 177 U.S. 290 , 20 S.Ct. 574 , 44 L. Ed. 774 (1900); Gnotta v. United States, 415 F.2d 1271 (8th Cir. 1969), cert. denied 397 U.S. 934 , 90 S.Ct. 941 , 25 L.Ed.2d 115 (1970); Powell v. … Fass v. Ruegg, 379 F.2d 216 (6th Cir. 1967) ; Baum v. Zuckert, 342 F.2d 145 (6th Cir. 1965).

Jo Carol Edwards v. Peoplease, LLC

Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 22, 2025

Edwards v. Peoplease, No. 2020- 07-0656, 2024 WL 3311539, at *15 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. July 2, 2024). The Appeals Board determined that Ms. … State v.

Jamie Henderson, as Surviving Spouse of David Joe Turner v. Pee Dee Country Enterprises, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 20, 2022

In Jones v. General Accident Ins. … State v. Gibson, 506 S.W.3d 450, 455 (Tenn. 2016); State v. Dycus,456 S.W.3d 918, 924(Tenn. 2015).

Oscar Paul Guess, III v. City of Manchester, a Tennessee Municipality

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 15, 2010

A party seeking the recusal of a judge or board member must raise the issue promptly after the relevant facts become known. See Bean v. Bailey, 280 S.W.3d 798, 803 (Tenn. 2009); Davis v. Tenn. … Thus, material evidence exists to support the Board’s decision. Lewis v. Bedford County Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 174 S.W.3d 241 (Tenn. Ct.

Total Building Maintenance, Inc. v. J & J Contractors/Raines Brothers, a Joint Venture, J & J Contractors, Inc., Raines Brothers, Inc., St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., and Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 13, 2009

Castelli v. Lien, 910 S.W.2d 420 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). Also see, Hogue v. Kroger Co., 373 S.W.2d 714, 716 (Tenn. 1963). … Sept. 12, 2000); and Brown v. McCord, et al., No. 03A01-9509-CH-00329 (Ct. App. issued Jan. 30, 1996).

Westland West Community Ass'n v. Knox County

948 S.W.2d 281 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1997

Wilgus v. City of Murfeesboro, 532 S.W.2d 50, 53-54 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1975). If the revision is inconsequential and would not have altered the board's recommendation, resubmission is not mandated. … Id.; State v. Board of Comm'rs of Knox County Tenn., 806 S.W.2d 181, 188 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990). An affirmative answer to either question mandates resubmission.

Browning v. Rohm & Haas Tennessee, Inc.

16 F. Supp. 2d 896 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 6, 1998

See Wooden v. Board of Educ. of Jefferson County, 931 F.2d 376, 378 (6th Cir.1991). “This proof ‘in effect creates a presumption that the employer unlawfully discriminated against the employee.’” … See Wrenn v.

Willie Sandifer v. Civil Service Bd.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 15, 1999

AT JACKSON WILILE SANDIFER, ) ) Petitioner/Appellee, ) Shelby Chancery No.108351-2 ) v. … See Watts v. Civil Service Board for Columbia, 606 5 S.W.2d 274, 276-277 (Tenn. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 983, 101 S.Ct. 1519, 67 L.Ed.2d 818 (1981).