Case law

Mundy v. Casualty Claims Service, Inc.

527 P.2d 614 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1974

Defendant Casualty Claims Service, Inc., by and through its president, Sam Brown, had knowledge of the existence of the lien as filed by Catlin Aviation Company and failed to pay such obligation or negotiate a release of … In Hartford Fire Insurance Company v.

Tennyson v. State

70 Okla. Crim. 415 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 31, 1940

R. 1471, and in the case of Vandervort et al. v. Keen, District Judge, 184 Okla. 121 , 85 P. 2d 405 . It is unnecessary to quote from these opinions. … In the case of Herrin v. Arnold, supra [ 183 Okla. 392 , 82 P. 2d 982 , 119 A. L.

IN RE INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 403 STATE QUESTION NO. 779

2016 OK 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 2016

The State Board of Equalization, on the other hand, is an executive board. Okla. Const. art. X, § 21. ¶15 The Court examined a similar issue in Fent v. Contingency Review Board , 2007 OK 27, ¶ 1, 163 P.3d 512, 516. … NO. 408 Discussed at Length 1908 OK 67, 95 P. 429, 20 Okla. 809, REGENTS OF UNIV. v. BOARD OF EDUC. Discussed at Length 1910 OK 165, 109 P. 558, 26 Okla. 403, THREADGILL v.

ANDREWS v. STATE ex rel. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY

2014 OK CIV APP 19 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 6, 2013

OSCN Found Document:ANDREWS v. STATE ex rel. DEPT. … Comm'rs of Land Office v.

McLaughlin v. Nettleton

25 Okla. 319 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1909

Pratt & McKenzie v. Keils & Sylvester, 28 Ala. 390 ; Gracier et al. v. Weir, 45 Cal. 53 ; Gilchrist Transp. Co. v. Northern Grain Co., 204 Ill. 510 , 68 N. E. 558 ; Hill et al v. Crump, 24 Ind. 291 ; Buck v. … W. 1022 ; Brown v. Brown, 86 Tenn. 277 , 6 S. W. 869 , 7 S. W. 640 ; 1 Freeman on Judgments (4th Ed.) § 109, p. 161; 1 Black on Judgments, § 351, p. 429; 6 Enc. Pleading & Practice, 158; 23 Cyc. 958; 30 Cent. Dig. tit.

Dixon v. Regional University System of the Oklahoma Board of Regents

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Jun 8, 2023

Bryce v. Trace, Inc.; WL 906143 *3 (W.D. Okla. … See e.g., Hirase–Doi v. U.S.

MURATORE v. STATE ex rel. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY

320 P.3d 1024 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 2014

Taylor v. … ."); U.S. v.

International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 2479 v. Thorpe

632 P.2d 408 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1981

Sanders v. Benton, 579 P.2d 815 (Okl.1978); Carl v. … Laman v. McCord, 245 Ark. 401 , 432 S.W.2d 753 (1968); Board of Public Instruction v. Doran, 224 So.2d 693 (Fla.1969); Bagby v.

Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Riddings v. Neville

10 Okla. 79 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1900

West v. … In the case of Farely v. The Board of Commissioners, of Hamilton County, 126 Ind. 468 , it is held: “If the act of the board is purely ministerial or ad ministrative, no appeal lies.”

Miles v. Parkinson

193 Okla. 380 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 1943

Lillard v. Meisberger, 113 Okla. 228 , 240 P. 1067 . Plaintiff has urged in this appeal that he is entitled to judgment on the theory that delivery of the deed to the county treasurer constituted delivery to him. … On such new trial the issues will be limited under the rule announced in Holbrook v. Moore, 177 Okla. 173 , 58 P. 2d 865 , to the question of whether the purchaser was guilty of fraud.

State Ex Rel. Department of Corrections v. Brock

513 P.2d 1293 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1973

State v. District Court of Nowata County, supra. The Court cited with approval the case of State ex rel. Cowan v. … State v. District Court of Bryan County, supra, 290 P.2d at 416-417 . The Supreme Court of Kansas has construed statutes identical to 12 O.S.1971, § 131 and § 133 in Huerter v.

Medicine Lodge Investments, L.L.C. v. Ear, Inc.

197 P.3d 502 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 15, 2008

Brown v. Alliance Real Estate Group, 1999 OK 7 , 976 P.2d 1043, 1045 . Summary judgment is not *508 proper where reasonable minds could draw different inferences or conclusions from the undisputed facts. Id. … See Henley v.

Hickerson v. State

565 P.2d 684 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 31, 1977

Fallis v. … Yes, sir, on the shorter man, he wore a brown hat, brown trousers and a gray sweater. “Q. Is there more on the physical description, there, officer? “A. No, sir, not on this particular subject. “Q.

City of Tulsa v. Terrill

194 Okla. 380 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1944

the issue of jurisdiction of the board was unquestioned, and that his consideration of the case was limited wholly to the issue of whether the board of commission's of the city exceeded its jurisdiction in the decision rendered … We said in Parmenter v.

Yazel v. William K. Warren Medical Research Center, Inc.

364 P.3d 1290 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 2014

KAUGER, J. 1 1 This cause No. 111,648 Ken Yazel, Tulsa County Assessor v, The William K. Warren Medical Research Center, Inc., et al (Ya-zel 2) and its companion case No. 111,502 Ken Yazel, Tuiso County Assessor v. … It shall be the mandatory duty of the board of county commissioners and the county excise board to prov1de the necessary funds to enable the county assessor to pay the costs necessary to be incurred in perfecting appeals

In re Evinger

629 P.2d 363 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 2, 1981

Greene v. Committee of Bar Examiners, supra. … The conclusion of the Special Board of Bar Examiners is affirmed and the petitioner is denied admission to the Oklahoma Bar. IRWIN, C. J., BARNES, V. C.

Kirk v. Union Graded School Dist. No. 1

180 Okla. 198 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 11, 1937

The plaintiff also cites Board of Com’rs of McCurtain County v. … Another asserted justification for the judgment is that the contract is void because it was entered into by the two members of the school board as individuals and not as a board, —citing School District v.

Grubb v. Johnson Oil Refining Co.

198 Okla. 433 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1947

Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County Excise Board, 191 Okla. 586 , 131 P. 2d 745 . The listing by plaintiff was not an assessment. … Board of County Commissioners v. City of Clinton, 49 Okla. 795 , 154 P. 513 .

Sinclair-Prairie Oil Co. v. State

169 Okla. 334 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1934

The board of equalization is an administrative body. … J., CULLISON, V. O. J., and SWINDALL, McNEILL, BAYLESS, BUSBY, and WELCH, JJ., concur. ANDREWS, J., absent.

O'Brien v. Gassoway

125 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 1927

“To All To Whom These Presents M»v Oome. … S. 1921, and Garrett v.