Case law

Smile, Inc. v. Moosehead Sanitary District

649 A.2d 1103 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 10, 1994

Butler v. Hardy, 576 A.2d 202, 203 (Me.1990). … Masselli v. Fenton, 157 Me. 330 , 172 A.2d 728, 731 (1961).

Rhoades v. Varney

91 Me. 222 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 5, 1898

Mayhew v. Sullivan Mining Co., 76 Maine, 100, 108; Buzzell v. Laconia Manf. Co., 48 Maine, 113; Shanny v. Androscoggin Mills Co., 66 Maine, 420. … Nason v.

State v. Thomes

697 A.2d 1262 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 10, 1997

See State v. … Brown, 552 A.2d 12, 14 (Me.1988) (although evidence not excluded pursuant to Rule 404(b) was unfavorable to defendant, it was relevant and probative on issue of opportunity and was not so prejudicial to rise to level of obvious

Daley v. COM'R, DEPT. OF MARINE RESOURCES

698 A.2d 1053 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 8, 1997

Richardson, 285 A.2d 842, 844-45 (Me.1972) (state may legitimately prohibit possession of lobsters on board any boat rigged for otter or beam trawling). … Board of Bar Overseers v.

State v. Boynton

379 A.2d 994 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 18, 1977

Small v. Maine Board of Registration and Examination in Optometry, Me., 293 A.2d 786, 788 (1972). … Finks v. Maine State Highway Commission, Me., 328 A.2d 791, 796 (1974). The statutes here challenged withstand the constitutional attack. As for standards, 12 M.R.S.A. §§ 4251-4252 are patently conservation measures.

Campbell v. First American Title Insurance

644 F. Supp. 2d 126 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 2, 2009

See, e.g., Hodsdon v. Town of Hermon, 760 A.2d 221, 222-23 (Me.2000) (challenge to approval of site plan by town planning board); Ne. Occupational Exch., Inc. v. … Inhabitants of Eliot, 448 A.2d 876, 878 (Me.1982) (challenge to planning board's denial of subdivision application); Fisher v.

Catholic Charities of Maine, Inc. v. City of Portland

304 F. Supp. 2d 77 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 6, 2004

The corporation’s members, in turn, vote to approve members of the Board of Directors. Id. ¶ 47 . Thus, the Bishop of Portland essentially controls the Board of Directors. … In Bagley v.

In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation

842 F. Supp. 2d 346 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 1, 2012

Reynolds v. Beneficial Nat’l Bank, 288 F.3d 277, 288 (7th Cir.2002). 8 The point is well-taken. … Feb. 17, 2009), Chief Judge Brown used a multi-factor test in evaluating a percentage-of-the-fund contingent fee request.

Gorham Sand & Gravel v. Town of Sebago

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 2, 2023

v. … Bryant v.

Blasco v. Town of Southport

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 22, 2017

AP-2016-3 DIANE BLASCO, ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ORDER … Therefore, this matter is REMANDED to the Southport Board of Appeals and the Board of Appeals is ORDERED to consider the Plaintiff's appeal as required by 30-A M.R.S. § 2691(4).

Cady v. Tuttle

127 Me. 104 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 4, 1928

II, Sec. 989; Haley v. Palmer, 107 Me., 314; Buck v. Swasey, 35 Me., 50; Lawry v. Spaulding, 73 Me., 33; Young v. Snow, 167 Mass., 287, 288 , 23 R. C. L., 573, 575; Ricker v. … Coates v. Lunt, 210 Mass., 314, 318 ; Brown v. Cowell, 116 Mass., 461 ; Perry on Trusts, 5th Ed., Vol. I, Sec. 195; Farnam v. Brooks, 9 Pick., 212 . From the record in this case, an assignment or release by Mrs.

Haskell v. Town of North Haven

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 21, 2005

(Test. of Elliott Brown.) 16. … I E W D A V I D B HASKELL, E T ALS V .

Crosby v. Maine Central Railroad

113 Me. 270 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 3, 1915

Norcross, 162 Mass., 546 (the case of a child of about six years of age), Gleason v. Smith, 180 Mass., 6 , (a boy of twelve), Godfrey v. Boston Elevated Ry., 215 Mass., 432 , (a boy of seven); Brown v. European & N. A. … Day v. R. R., supra.

Estate of Campbell

704 A.2d 329 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 4, 1997

John, relying on Gaulin v. … See Hall v. Hall, 106 Me. 389, 391 , 76 A. 705, 706 (1910); Brown v. Dickey, 106 Me. 97, 103 , 75 A. 382, 385 (1909).

Pope v. Remisa

463 A.2d 714 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 29, 1983

See Calthorpe v. Abrahamson, 423 A.2d 231, 233-34 (Me.1980). II. … Thornton v. Estate of Cressey, 413 A.2d 540, 544 (Me.1980); see M.R.Civ.P. 53(c), (e)(1); Boothbay Harbor Condominiums v. Department of Transportation, 382 A.2d 848, 853 (Me.1978).

State of Maine v. Matthew T. Collier

66 A.3d 563 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 7, 2013

See State v. Brown, 675 A.2d 504, 505 (Me. 1996). We review the grant or denial of a motion to suppress de novo as a matter of law, however. … United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 554 n.6 (1980); State v.

Tomasino v. Town of Casco

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 20, 2019

See Somes v. … See Toomey v.

Patent Button Co. v. Consolidated Fastener Co.

84 F. 189 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · Nov 6, 1897

The expressions in Brown v. Piper, 91 U. … Packard v. Lacing-Stud Co., 16 C. C. A. 639 , 70 Fed. 66, 67 ; Boston & R. Electric St. Ry. Co. v. Bemis Car-Box Co., 25 C. C. A. 420 , 80 Fed. 287, 290 ; American Street-Car Advertising Co. v. Newton St. Ry. Co.

Curtis v. Maine State Highway Commission

160 Me. 262 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 28, 1964

The amount of just compensation was decided by the Land Damage Board. The instant plaintiff and defendant each appealed from the decision of the Board. … Portland and Rochester Railroad Company v. Inhabitants of Deering, 78 Me. 61, 66, 67 . See also Gilmore v.

State v. Morton

125 Me. 9 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 2, 1925

State v. Rogers, 95 Maine, 94; State v. Chadwick, 119 Maine, 45. These principles applied to the contentions of the respondent upon this branch of the case render futile the exceptions immediately under consideration. … The present statute enjoins immediate liberation alive, of short lobsters, State v. Chadwick, supra.