Case law

Curtiss v. Brown

29 Ill. 201 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1862

Thus, in Saunders v. … But the authority of this case is denied in Taylor v. Philips, 2 Ves. Sr. 23, and in Russel v. Russel, 1 Mallory, 525.

Brown v. State

16 Ind. 496 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1861

Jackson v. The State, 6 Blackf. 461 ; Brown v. The State, 8 id. 561 . In civil cases, the statute authorizes the parties to agree upon a less number, and a jury consisting of twelve may be waived. Durham v. … The case of Cancemi v.

Brown v. Fore

12 S.W.2d 114 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 2, 1929

Peake v. Ledger, 8 Hare, 313; Crane v. Howell, 35 N. J. Eq. 374; McGregor v. McGregor, 35 N. Y. 218 ; Smith v. Lawrence, 11 Paige, 206 ; 1 Pomeroy, Eq. Jur. § 51. … Rollison v. Hope, 18 Tex. 446 ; White v. Downs, 40 Tex. 236 . The rights with which F. M.

Brown v. Brown

275 So. 3d 798 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 28, 2019

The former husband, Kenneth Brown, appeals the final judgment dissolving his marriage to the former wife, Lauren Brown. … See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150 , 1152 (Fla. 1979) ; see also Rayess v. Bitar , 254 So. 3d 1197 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Tenbrook v. Brown

17 Ind. 410 · Indiana Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1861

Tenbj'ook was one of the heirs and distributees, through his mother, of Samuel Brown, deceased, and the defendant, Brown, was a son of the deceased, and his executor. … McClay v. The State, 1 Ind. 385 . In this case, however, it does not appear from the record that any such verbal explanations or modifications were made.

State v. Brown

2024 Ohio 440 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 2024

[Cite as State v. Brown, 2024-Ohio-440.] … State v.

Allegheny Development Corp., Inc. v. Barati

166 W. Va. 218 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1980

Syllabus Point 1, Board of Trustees v. Blair, 45 W.Va. 812 , 32 S.E. 203 (1899). See, Hutchinson v. Walton, 119 W.Va. 709 , 196 S.E. 20 (1938); Atkinson v. Jones, 110 W.Va. 463 , 158 S.E. 650 (1931); Swope v. … Brown and Mr. Paul Thomas of the Bruceton Bank. Having learned that Mr. Paul Thomas and Mr. Charles H.

Brown v. State

50 Tex. Crim. 114 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 23, 1906

Brown v. Ferguson

2 Denio 196 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1846

(See Slack v Brown, 13 Wend. 390 ; Graham v. Gedney, Grah. Pr. 544, note, 2d ed. This was a tender before suit brought; and it was not available to the defendant, for thereason that the money was not brought into court. … (Retan v. Drew, 19 Wend. 304 .) But the suit was not commenced until the declaration was filed and served. (Johnson v. Comstock, 6 Hill, 10 .) On a common law tender the money must be brought into court.

State v. Brown

80 N.J. 587 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 24, 1979

In this case, glassine envelopes and rubber bands, items used in the packaging and distribution of heroin, were found in Brown’s apartment. … State v. Rajnai, 132 N. J. Super. 530, 536 (App. Div. 1975); State v. Bozeyowski, 77 N. J. Super. 49, 57 (App. Div. 1962), cert. den. 374 U. S. 851 , 83 S. Ct. 1916 , 10 L. Ed. 2d 1071 (1963); State v. Brown, 67 N. J.

Brown v. Chadsey

39 Barb. 253 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1863

(Mitchell v. Jenkins, 5 B. & Adol. 588. Whalley v. Pepper, 7 Carr. & Payne, 506. Walker v. Cruikshank, 2 Hill, 297 . 1 Arch. N. P. 446.) … (See Samuel v. Payne, Doug. 358; Holley v. Mix, 3 Wend. 350 .)

State v. Brown

2013 Ohio 3608 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 2013

[Cite as State v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-3608.] … FARMER CRB/rad [Cite as State v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-3608.]

Brown v. Key

425 S.C. 490 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Jan 4, 2019

.: **491 Heather Key (Mother) appeals the family court's order mandating visitation between her child (Child) and Child's paternal grandmother, Lori Brown (Grandmother). … See Troxel v.

Brown v. Connelly

5 Blackf. 390 · Indiana Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1840

Connelly sued Brown for malicious prosecution. … Browne, 3 Adol. & Ell. 312; but still it was not subject to a demurrer for the cause alleged.

People v. Brown

281 A.D.2d 962 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 21, 2001

To obtain a valid waiver, County Court was not required to engage in any particular litany (see, People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 ; People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909, 910-911 ; People v McDonald, 270 AD2d 955 , lv denied 95 NY2d … The waiver encompasses the contention of defendant that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress his statements to the police (see, People v Frank, 258 AD2d 900, 901 , lv denied 93 NY2d 924 ; People v Hicks, 254

Brown v. State

508 S.W.2d 91 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 17, 1974

Simmons v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 504 S.W.2d 465 ; Gutierrez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 502 S.W.2d 746 ; Brookins v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 499 S.W.2d 320 ; Taylor v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 498 S.W.2d 346 . … In Byrd v.

Stephani v. Brown

40 Ill. 428 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1866

After the accident, one of the appellants closed up the space, covered by the grate, with boards. … Dygert v. Schenck, 23 Wend. 446 ; Hart v. Mayor of Albany, 9 id. 607; Harlow v. Humiston, 6 Cow. 191 ; Lansing v. Smith, 8 id. 152; Creed v. Hartman, 29 N. Y. 591 ; Scammon v. Chicago, 25 Ill. 438 .

Brown v. State

1 Tenn. Crim. App. 462 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 12, 1969

In Walter William Ussery v. … Newsom v. Henderson, 221 Tenn. 24 , 424 S.W.2d 186 ; Knewel v. Egan, 268 U.S. 442, 446 , 45 S.Ct. 522 , 69 L.Ed. 1036 ; Underwood v.

Brown v. Girard

1 Binn. 40 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1803

The protest of the master of a vessel was first ruled to be evidence in the case of Nixon v. Harper v. Long, in 1762.

Bacon v. Brown

7 Ky. 91 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Jun 5, 1815

Brown thou brought suit against Bacon, alleging. a warranty of soundness, and «pon a trial on the general issue, a verdict and judgment were obtained by Brown. … demurred, but the demurrer being overruled by the court, at the instance of Bacon, it was withdrawn, and the general issue pleaded ; and upon a trial of that issue a v erdict was again found for Brown: Bacon then moved for