Case law

In re Neogenix Oncology, Inc.

508 B.R. 345 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · Mar 11, 2014

However, that other interested bidder declined to submit a qualifying bid. Thus, PB was deemed to be the successful bidder. … It is unnecessary for a court to determine whether an individual is both a director and a person in control, or both an officer and a person in control, as the statutory definition is clearly stated in the disjunctive.

Tripp

District Court, D. Maryland · Nov 19, 2025

Plaintiffs objected on the basis that the tax returns are subject to a qualified privilege.1 (ECF No. 93). … Further, it considered if the plaintiffs “were performing at a wide variety of establishments, this information would also provide evidence as to the economic reality of the relationship.” Id. at *7.

Police Commissioner v. Siegel Enters., Inc.

223 Md. 110 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 1, 1960

They contend that, irrespective of the validity of other portions of the act, the prohibition regarding obscenity is clearly constitutional and should be upheld. … Michigan, has fixed barriers of due process of law and freedom of the press which the Maryland statute clearly violates. *134 “These violations permeate the entire act.

United States v. Fraidin

63 F. Supp. 271 · District Court, D. Maryland · Oct 27, 1945

Thus, it had been held that ■so far as the offense of concealment from the trustee in bankruptcy is concerned, the period did not begin to run until the trustee qualifies by giving bond; see Block v. … A sensible application of the established rules of statutory construction alone must control us.

Acme Card System Co. v. Remington Rand Business Service, Inc.

21 F. Supp. 742 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jan 7, 1938

that the Maryland Company was incorporated in 1931 for this purpose and took over the business formerly conducted by the Service Company in all states other than those in which the Delaware Company was doing, or became qualified … Cir., 71 F.2d 628, 632, 633 ), italics inserted: “The continuous sheet of strips can be placed in a typewriting machine like an ordinary sheet of paper so- as to receive the record, and can thereafter be separated by hand clearly

Chew v. Meyer

72 Md. App. 132 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jul 10, 1987

There is simply no evidence to establish the existence of a fiduciary relationship between Dr. Meyer and Chew concerning the insurance form at issue. … The bank initially determined that the applicants qualified for a loan of $74,000, but later informed them that an error had been made and $41,400 was the most the bank would lend them.

Rippeon v. Frederick County Board of Education

833 F. Supp. 2d 499 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jun 16, 2011

In arguing that he was raising an issue of public concern, Plaintiff relies exclusive on Pickering , suggesting that this case, was “[n]ot directly on point, but clearly analogous.” Opp’n at iii. … That he did engage in arguably protected conduct cannot immunize him from the ramifications of a poor work history and blatant insubordination.

Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Bennett

District Court, D. Maryland · Jun 27, 2019

The bar for establishing imminent danger, though high, is not insurmountable. … In sum, Gorbey has not established that he is in imminent danger of a physical harm and he is therefore not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis.

American Home Assurance Co. v. Osbourn

47 Md. App. 73 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Nov 7, 1980

Of course, every fact necessary to establish coverage need not be alleged. As the Court of Appeals held in the case of United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. … The trial court granted the Commission’s motion under Rule 323 (b) raising preliminary objection on grounds of governmental immunity and Osbourn appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed. O & B, Inc. v.

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Seitz

110 Md. App. 355 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jun 3, 1996

Indeed, that result would be clearly at odds with the statutory language, and our opinion in Erie indicates quite the contrary. … As heretofore indicated, § 543(b) and (c) establish which insurer is liable for payment of PIP benefits.

State Board of Physicians v. Bernstein

167 Md. App. 714 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Mar 8, 2006

Lyles was a biased witness, as he “is clearly on one side of [the CRNA collaboration] debate.” The ALJ observed that Dr. … In the case at bar, we are not dealing with a clearly erroneous factual finding or the erroneous admission of evidence.

Wheeler v. State

35 Md. App. 372 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Mar 16, 1977

The detective *374 further stated that he was attracted to the publication by its cover, which indicated clearly, as we have said, that it was concerned with Linda Lovelace. 2 At trial, the State, at the conclusion of the … Qualified as an Associate Judge of this Court, July 9, 1976. . Miss Lovelace became well-known because of her participation in the controversial motion picture “Deep Throat.” .

Getty v. Carroll County Board of Elections

399 Md. 710 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 21, 2007

And be it enacted, That the inhabitants of Carroll county, shall have, hold, and enjoy all the immunities, rights, and privileges enjoyed by the inhabitants of any other county in this State.” 4 . … The language clearly stated that "the Commission Redistricting Committee shall report its recommendations to the Carroll County Legislative Delegation to the General Assembly for consideration at the following legislative

Topps Garment Manufacturing Corp. v. State

212 Md. 23 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Oct 1, 1965

In that case, a Minnesota corporation which had never qualified as a foreign corporation in Iowa and which did not maintain there any office, branch or warehouse, sent salesmen into the State to solicit orders that were always … The authorities establish that appellant is not denied due process of law by what the State has done. No question arises in the case as to the right to obtain jurisdiction in personam over the appellant.

Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A.

365 Md. 166 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 17, 2001

Scott,” which “is clearly account information under any possible reasonable definition of the term, and is certainly within the scope of § 1-301 et seq. of the Financial Institutions Code, as well as the definition provided … When he opened his account with Sovran Bank, the respondent's predecessor, the petitioner agreed to the rules and conditions established by the bank.

Wells v. Pierpont

253 Md. 554 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 27, 1969

Hospital, 246 Md. 197, 202 (1967), as "a well-qualified real estate expert." Mr. … The "character of the neighborhood," as it concerns us here, was established by the map in November 1962.

United States v. Dow

25 F. Cas. 901 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · Apr 15, 1840

This qualified admission of their testimony against each other, was always held to be an implied exclusion of it In favor of one another; and this produced the act of assembly of 1801, c. 109, which permitted them to give … But the rule upon this subject is very clearly stated in the case of Rex v.

Walker v. Department of Housing & Community Development

422 Md. 80 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Sep 23, 2011

. § 1437f(o )(4), HUD regulations, and the procedure established by its Administrative Plan, is responsible for processing and qualifying the low income applicants. See 42 U.S.C. § 1437f(o )(6). … Though Wicomico County has established a housing authority, the county presumably has decided not to administer the HCVP program.

Watts v. Nakasone

District Court, D. Maryland · Aug 16, 2022

In addition, defendants contend that Count III is barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. (Id.) … An individual qualifies as “appointed in the civil service” if she is appointed by an individual who is also an “employee” under Section 2105. Id. § 2105(a)(1)(D).

Johns Hopkins Hospital, Inc. v. Insurance Commissioner

302 Md. 411 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 5, 1985

They point out that the Health Services Cost Review Commission was established to assure each purchaser of hospital services that the total costs of the hospital are reasonably related to the total services offered by the … In that case Chief Judge Hammond said for the Court: “Whichever of the recognized tests the court uses— substantiality of the evidence on the record as a whole, clearly erroneous, fairly debatable or against the weight or