Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.88s
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 3, 2026
Typically, qualified immunity hinges on “whether the federal right allegedly infringed was ‘clearly established.’” Behrens v. Pelletier, 516 U.S. 299, 313 (1996) (citation omitted). … But the magistrate judge never analyzed whether Plaintiffs rights were clearly established. Nor did he affirmatively conclude that he was denying qualified immunity to Hardeman.
Cited 0 timesPublished752 F. Supp. 346 · District Court, C.D. California · Oct 12, 1990
There are two kinds of immunity. One is absolute immunity, and the other is qualified or good-faith immunity. … Under qualified immunity, government officials are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would
Cited 4 timesPublished58 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 678 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2015
Brown & Gay’s reliance on Filar-sky's qualified-immunity analysis is misplaced. … The federal doctrine of qualified immunity “protects government officials ‘from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable
Cited 143 timesPublishedBaggerly v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
370 S.C. 362 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Aug 28, 2006
Causation-in-fact is proved by establishing the injury would not have occurred “but for” the defendant’s negligence, and legal cause is proved by establishing foreseeability. Id. … or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify.”
Cited 51 timesPublished229 F. Supp. 2d 520 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Nov 7, 2002
Clearly Established The Fourth Amendment right to be free from arrest in the absence of probable cause is clearly established. See Henderson, 223 F.3d at 273 . … But, “if the test of ‘clearly established law' were to be applied at this level of generality, ... plaintiffs would be able to convert the rule of qualified immunity ... into a rule of virtually unqualified liability.”
Cited 9 timesPublished923 F.3d 411 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 2, 2019
The district court granted summary judgment to the officials based on qualified immunity, holding that the threat of criminal prosecution wasn't "other legal process" under clearly established law. Reed appealed. … "The doctrine of qualified immunity shields officials from civil liability so long as their conduct 'does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.'
Cited 38 timesPublished852 F. Supp. 986 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Apr 6, 1994
Thus, if the applicable law was not clearly established, or if the law was clearly established and Defendant James did not violate that law in terminating Plaintiff, he is entitled to qualified immunity. … CONCLUSION Defendant James is entitled to qualified immunity because he did not violate clearly established law in terminating Plaintiff.
Cited 11 timesPublished58 F.3d 271 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 1995
Defendants contend that Ward has failed to allege the violation of a clearly established right. … Therefore, defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. 4 IV. For the reasons set forth above, we REVERSE the district court’s denial of qualified immunity. 1 .
Cited 127 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 13, 2026
On the immunity issues, it denied qualified immunity to Deputy Do, ruling that United States ex rel. Tobe was an anal- ogous case and clearly established that Deputy Do’s conduct violated Mr. … Deputy Woida is entitled to qualified immunity for a sec- ond reason—there’s no clearly established law that says that a bailiff who fails to stop someone else from making an im- proper statement to a juror violates a defendant
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilliam C. Powell v. Thomas J. Mikulecky, George Oates, Ruth Stephens and Wendall Gilliam
891 F.2d 1454 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Dec 15, 1989
The test for qualified immunity is whether defendants violated “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Harlow v. … Once a defendant raises the defense of qualified immunity as a defense to an action, “[t]he plaintiff carries the burden of convincing the court that the law was clearly established.”
Cited 115 timesPublished770 F.2d 619 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 8, 1985
and qualified immunity. … Plaintiff argued in the alternative that even if defendants had not violated clearly established constitutional rights, they should be denied qualified immunity because they had violated a state administrative regulation.
Cited 65 timesPublished884 F.3d 1060 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Mar 13, 2018
The district court denied Cannon’s request for qualified immunity. … Procedural Background Cannon filed a motion for summary judgment, claiming he was entitled to qualified immunity. 2 He asserted that to establish a violation of the Free Exercise Clause, Ralston “must show that his
Cited 26 timesPublishedTommy D. Hopkins v. John L. Saunders, Kyle Vickers, Charles Ausfahl, Roy Temple, Beth M. Wheeler
93 F.3d 522 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Sep 23, 1996
Qualified Immunity Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, government officials are generally immune from suit in performing discretionary duties if “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional … The district court determined, however, that the right to such a hearing was clearly established by section 105.055 and thus denied the officials qualified immunity. We disagree.
Cited 13 timesPublishedEthan James Charles v. Jeff Johnson
18 F.4th 686 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Nov 16, 2021
To lose qualified immunity, the circumstances must show that the force was clearly excessive. See Post v. … Once we determined that the use of force was ex- cessive, the next question in the qualified immunity analysis asks whether the officer violated clearly established law.
Cited 105 timesPublishedEstate of Bleck ex rel. Churchill v. Martinez
383 P.3d 39 · Colorado Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 2014
’s motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity. … On appeal, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of the Fourth Amendment claim against Officer Martinez, concluding that he could not be found to have violated clearly established Fourth
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · Oct 31, 2019
Therefore, a qualified immunity analysis is not necessary. … violate any clearly established right of Plaintiff.
Cited 0 timesUnknown980 N.E.2d 1275 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 14, 2012
Qualified Immunity ¶ 33 Defendants contend if we conclude the trial court erred in determining no issue of material fact exists, we should hold plaintiffs’ claims are barred by qualified immunity. ¶ 34 … the constitutional right was clearly established.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSoscia Holdings, LLC v. P State of Rhode Island, et al.
2023 DNH 074 · District Court, D. New Hampshire · Jun 15, 2023
Qualified immunity applies where: (1) a federal right was violated, and (2) “the 21 unlawfulness of the conduct was clearly established at the time.” … Courts may begin the qualified immunity analysis by considering the clearly established prong. Id.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMark Campbell v. Cheatham County Sheriff's Dep't
47 F.4th 468 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 29, 2022
Therefore, we turn to whether the right was clearly established. 3 An officer is not entitled to qualified immunity if he violates a constitutional right … “The doctrine of qualified immunity shields officials from civil liability so long as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
Cited 38 timesPublished593 F.3d 233 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 28, 2010
For qualified immunity purposes, however, we must more precisely define the rights at issue, and only then determine whether they were “clearly established.” … For qualified immunity purposes, however, there is a separate question, which is whether the right violated by this conduct was clearly established.
Cited 270 timesPublished
Ask Donna