Case law

Poppleton v. Yamhill County

8 Or. 337 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1880

Rhea, appellant, v. Umatilla County, 2 Oregon, 298. In that case it was held that such board was a tribunal whose decisions are subject to be reviewed, and we think that decision correct. … The security was greatly disproportioned to the. amount of money borrowed, which may have been taken as a circumstance by the board.

Reed v. Dunbar

41 Or. 509 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1902

Co. v. Riggen, 31 Or. 336 ( 48 Pac. 476 ); Ex parte Ferdon, 35 Or. 171 ( 57 Pac. 376 ). … to that board or commission the right to appoint subordinate officers or agents to carry out the legislative will: State ex rel. v.

Gordon v. City of Beaverton

292 Or. 228 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1981

Scott Construction v. Farrell, 285 Or 563, 568 , 592 P2d 551 (1979). But LUBA is an agency, not a court in the judicial system. … Compare Fish & Wildlife Department v. LCDC, 288 Or 203 , *231 603 P2d 1371 (1979) (statute precluded agency’s requiring exhaustion of pre-review remedies).

Iliaifar v. SAIF Corp.

160 Or. App. 116 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 1999

In Fred Meyer, Inc. v. … See Savin Corp. v.

Guerrero v. Stayton Canning Co.

92 Or. App. 209 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 20, 1988

The Board agreed with the referee but held that the denial was premature under Roller v. … An employer may not issue a partial denial of a previously accepted inseparable condition while the claim is still open. *213 Roller v. Weyerhaeuser Co., supra; Safstrom v. Riedel International, Inc., supra.

Kiewit Pacific v. Ennis

119 Or. App. 123 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 31, 1993

Employer first argues that the Board’s order is inadequate for review under the rule stated in Home Plate, Inc. v. … The Board rejected that finding, but made no finding of its own regarding pay for travel time. If the Board intended its action to be a finding of fact on the issue, it should say so. In Bernards v.

Langfus, Inc. v. Queirolo

64 Or. App. 493 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 7, 1983

See also State Highway Com’n v. Deal et al, 191 Or 661, 682-83 , 233 P2d 242 (1951). … See Cook v. Michael, 214 Or 513, 527 , 330 P2d 1026 (1958); See also Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. v. McBride, 295 Or 398 , 667 P2d 494 (1983).

Hawkins v. Linn County School District No. 14

16 Or. App. 41 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 1973

Plaintiff contends that by virtue of Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 US 564 , 92 S Ct 2701 , 33 L Ed 2d 548 (1972), and Perry v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 33 L Ed 2d at 561 ; Skidmore v. Shamrock Independent School District, 464 F2d 605, 606 (5th Cir 1972).

State v. McLain

158 Or. App. 419 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 17, 1999

In State v. … In State v.

Bevan v. Garrett

284 Or. 293 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1978

See e.g., Melton v. Allen, 282 Or 731, 735 , 580 P2d 1019 (1978); Gleason v. International Multifoods Corp., 282 Or 253, 257-58 , 577 P2d 931 (1978); Pelege v. Chrysler, 278 Or 223, 227 , 563 P2d 701 (1977). … See State Farm Fire v.

Central Oregon Landwatch v. Deschutes County

315 Or. App. 673 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 2021

We attempt to determine the meaning most likely intended by the enacting body, in this case the Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners (Board). … See Willamette Oaks, LLC v.

Dancingbear v. SAIF

314 Or. App. 538 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 2021

Arvidson v. Liberty Northwest Ins. … We review the board’s interpretation of a statute for errors of law. See Caren v.

Simon v. PIE Nationwide, Inc.

142 Or. App. 411 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 31, 1996

Claimant next assigns error to the Board’s application of DIF’s standards under the temporary rules, which claimant challenges as improperly adopted. In Ferguson v. U.S. … SAIF concedes error under Gallino v.

City of Portland v. Welch

154 Or. 286 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 20, 1936

In Pearce v. … Excise Board, 156 Okla. 192 ( 10 P. (2d) 403 ); City of Ardmore v. Excise Board, *307 supra; Excise Board v. Reid, 143 Okla. 204 ( 288 P. 458 ). Tallon v.

Martin v. City of Albany

320 Or. 175 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1994

In Gettman v. SAIF, 289 Or 609, 614 , 616 P2d 473 (1980), the Board had reduced a worker’s permanent disability award, because it found that he had a “potential” for retraining. … See also 1000 Friends v.

City of Albany v. Cary

201 Or. App. 147 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 10, 2005

Smirnoff v. SAIF, 188 Or App 438 , 72 P3d 118 (2003). … In Wayne-Dalton Corp. v.

International Paper Co. v. Wright

80 Or. App. 444 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 23, 1986

The Board’s December 27, 1984, order merely adhered to and republished the November 30 order on review; it did not “stay” the order on review or extend the time for seeking review. See Fischer v. … Shoulders v. SAIF, 300 Or 606 , 716 P2d 751 (1986) (when a claim is determined to be compensable, compensation is considered to have been awarded for the purpose of ORS 656.382(2)).

Greenbriar Ag Management v. Lemus

156 Or. App. 499 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 14, 1998

See Ebbtide Enterprises v. Tucker, 303 Or 459, 464 , 738 P2d 194 (1987). The Board explained: “It is apparent from the record that, at the time of the January 24 letter to Dr. … See Ebbtide Enterprises, 303 Or at 464-65 ; *505 SAIF v. Abbott, 103 Or App 49, 52-53 , 769 P2d 378 (1990); Newport Elks Club v. Hays, 92 Or App 604, 607 , 759 P2d 327 , rev den 307 Or 245 (1988).

United Parcel Service v. Likos

143 Or. App. 486 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 18, 1996

However, relying on Fossum, Bracke, and Progress Quarries v. … Compare Beneficiaries of Strametz; Bennett v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp., *491 128 Or App 71, 78 , 875 P2d 1176 (1994). 1 Accordingly, the Board erred in assigning responsibility to UPS.

Maddox v. Clackamas County School District No. 25

51 Or. App. 639 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 13, 1981

There is no review of the reason for discharge, or the good faith of the board. 4 In Henthorn v. … See Brooks v. Dierker, 275 Or 619 , 552 P2d 533 (1976); Jordan v. City Council of Lake Oswego, 49 Or App 31 , 618 P2d 1298 (1980), rev den (1981). Count I was properly dismissed.