Case law

Ex Parte Neighbors

85 Okla. Crim. 183 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1947

the possibility of transfer is an incident impliedly annexed thereto.” *192 Cited in support of this statement is Rich v. … See, also, Uram v. Roach, 47 Wyo. 335 , 37 P. 2d 793 , 95 A. L. R. 1448 and at page 1455, annotations of cases construing similar provisions to the same effect.

Darrow v. Integris Health, Inc.

176 P.3d 1204 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 15, 2008

Logan County Election Board, 2001 OK 52, ¶ 10 , 29 P.3d 543, 546 . 30 . Tyler v. Original Chili Bowl, Inc., 1997 OK CIV APP 3 , 934 P.2d 1106 . … Those public-policy causes recognized by other jurisdictions and cited in Hayes include: Palmer v. Brown, 242 Kan. 893 , 752 P.2d 685, 689-690 (1988) (outside reporting of medicaid fraud of employer); see also White v.

In Re Assessment of Western Union Telegraph Co.

35 Okla. 626 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1912

Ed. 960 ; Pullman’s Palace Car Co. v. Twombly (C. C.) 29 Fed. 658 ; Atty. Gen. v. Western U. Tel. Co. (C. C.) 33 Fed. 129 ; Pullman’s Palace Car Co. v. Board of Assessors (C. C.) 55 Fed. 206 ; Board of Assessors v. … Co. v. Backus, 133 Ind. 625 , 33 N. E. 432 ; Evansville & I. R. Co. v. West, 138 Ind. 697 , 37 N. E. 1012 ; Western U. Tel. Co. v. Taggart, 141. Ind. 281, 40 *631 N. E. 1051, 60 L. R. A. 671; State v. Adams Exp.

Frisco Lumber Co. v. Thomas

42 Okla. 670 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1914

opening left by the removal of the boards. … Co. v.

Gruger v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

192 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1943

Anderson-Kerr, Inc., v. Van Meter, 162 Okla. 176 , 19 P. 2d 1068 ; Blevins v. Harris, 172 Okla. 90 , 44 P. 2d 112 . … Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Kite, 167 Okla. 359 , 29 P. 2d. 942.

BOLER v. SECURITY HEALTH CARE, L.L.C.

336 P.3d 468 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2014

Brown and Root, Inc., 1992 OK 114 , ¶ 13, 836 P.2d 1298, 1301 . See also Haws v. Luethje, 1972 OK 146, ¶ 13 , 503 P.2d 871 . … See Marmet Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. Brown, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1201 , 182 LEd.2d 42 (2012)(per cu-riam).

Weeden v. Arnold

5 Okla. 578 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1897

Arnold, president of the board of health, the fees required by the rules and regulations of the board for such certificate; but the statute nowhere makes the president of the board of health the proper officer to whom to … There is nothing in the cases of Barmore v. Dickson, 28 Pac. 8 , and Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114 , relied upon by counsel for petitioner, that conflicts with the views herein expressed.

M.L.R. v. State

740 P.2d 1201 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1987

Relying on Crandell , this Court held in Brown v. State, 550 P.2d 963, 968 (Okl.Cr.1976), that: “The notice provisions are mandatory. … Appellant’s reliance on Stokes v.

Gripe v. Hatmaker

189 Okla. 317 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1941

In Bowles v. … Bowles v. Brown, supra. The defendants also contend that the evidence as to permanent damage to real property is not sufficient to sustain a verdict. In Gries v.

Oklahoma Agricultural & Mechanical College v. Willis

6 Okla. 593 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1898

Hamilton Co. v. Mighels, 7 Ohio St. 109 ; Finch v. Board of Education, 30 Id. 37; Manuel v. Comm’rs., 98 N. C. 9—3 S. E. 829; Dosdall v. County Com’rs. [Minn.] 14 N. W. 458 ; Eastman v. Clackamas Co., 32 Fed. 24 .) … In Finch v.

Going v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. CO.

88 Okla. 283 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1923

The excise board then appropriated $50,000 for that purpose. … Co. v. Walker, Co. Treas., 54 Okla. 359 , 154 Pac. 343 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Caldwell, Co. Treas., 75 Okla. 153 , 182 Pac. 688 .

Southern Drilling Co. v. McKee

171 Okla. 409 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1935

Choctaw Electric Co. v. Clark, 28 Okla. 399 , 114 P. 730 ; Prickett v. Sulzberger & Sons, 57 Okla. 567 , 157 P. 356 . … Co. v. Bennett, 36 Okla. 358 , 128 P. 705 ; Choctaw Electric Co. v. Clark, 28 Okla. 399 , 114 P. 730 ; Prickett v. Sulzberger & Sons, 57 Okla. 567 , 157 P. 356 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v.

OWENS v. ZUMWALT

2022 OK 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 2022

OSCN Found Document:OWENS v. ZUMWALT OWENS v. … Brown v. Okla. Secondary Sch. Activities Ass'n , 2005 OK 88 , ¶ 11, 125 P.3d 1219, 1225 .

Vogel v. Corporation Commission

190 Okla. 156 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1942

State v. Cobb, 24 Okla. 662 , 104 P. 361 , 24 L.R.A. (N. S.) 639. See, also, Baker v. Newton, 27 Okla. 436 , 112 P. 1034 ; Mathews v. Sniggs, 75 Okla. 108 , 182 P. 703 ; Keeter v. … See Burke & Brown v. Territory, 2 Okla. 499 , 37 P. 829 ; 35 C. J. 194, note 19; 6 R.C.L. 522, note 11; 12 Am. Jur. 429 , note 17.

In Re Texas Co.'s Assessment

168 Okla. 94 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 27, 1934

The case of New England Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 121 Okla. 277 , 249 P. 914 , also relied upon by plaintiff, is not in point. … Meriwether v. Lovett, 166 Okla. 73 , 26 P. (2d) 200 .

Welch v. Hillis

53 F. Supp. 456 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1944

In Anderson, Warden, v. … Citing Anderson v. Corall, supra, and Stockton v. Massey, supra. We see no difference in principle in the case at bar and Anderson v. Corall, supra.

State v. Prairie Cotton Oil Co.

180 Okla. 608 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1937

The assessments here were not arbitrary assessments, as was the circumstance in the Rorabaugh-Brown Case, supra. This question of assessing excess value was dealt with in State v. … Earlsboro Gas Co. v. Brown Drilling Co., 175 Okla. 320 , 52 P. (2d) 730 . Aside from the fact that it has a trade-name in which it may sue or be sued, it has no rights under the law that an individual does not possess.

Gammill v. Shackelford

480 P.2d 920 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1970

Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 278 P. 311 ; Dillard v. Sappington, 151 Okl. 47 , 1 P.2d 748 ; State ex rel. State Com’rs of Land Office v. Weems, 197 Okl. 106 , 168 P.2d 629 . … McCarty v. Cain, 27 Okl. 82 , 110 P. 653 ; State ex rel. Freeling v. Sullivan, 80 Okl. 81 , 194 P. 446 ; Smith et al. v. State ex rel. Barry Co. Atty., 84 Okl. 283 , 203 P. 1046 ; Wallace v.

Miller v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 12, 2025

Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). Rather, “[t]he plaintiff must also demonstrate that, through its deliberate conduct, the municipality was the ‘moving force’ behind the injury alleged.” Id. … Brown, 520 U.S. at 405. For the third element, Miller must plausibly allege that the Board and OCCJA acted with deliberate indifference.

Westerman v. State

525 P.2d 1359 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 13, 1974

In Synnott v. State, Okl.Cr., 515 P.2d 1154 (1973), this Court held that the power delegated by 47 O.S.1971, § 759, was primarily administrative and was a proper matter for delegation for the Legislature. … On April 23, 1973, the Board adopted the rules and regulations pursuant to 47 O.S. *1361 1971, § 759 which superseded and replaced rules adopted by the Board in August, 1969.