Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.23s

  • Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lechase

    886 F. Supp. 108 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 24, 1995

    Browning, 435 F.2d 96 (D.C.Cir.1970), the Federal Election Commission Act, Federal Election Commission v. … See Agnew v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve Sys., 153 F.2d 785, 788 (D.C.Cir.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hamilton v. City of Washington, District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 6, 2010

    Cir. 2003); Roberson v. Dist. of Columbia Bd. of Higher Educ., 359 A.2d 28, 31 n.4 (D.C. 1976) (holding the Board of Education is not a suable entity); Miller v. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 248 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46 cmt. d (1965)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

    41 A.3d 1219 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 2012

    Auth. v. … (James) Johnson v. United States, 398 A.2d 354, 366 (D.C.1979) (quoting Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Oma C. Brown v. S. David Rubenstein, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Estate of the Thirteen Hundred Corporation, Bankrupt

    288 F.2d 168 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 1961

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. District of Columbia

    467 A.2d 140 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1983

    Brown v. General Services Admin istration, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976) (similar holding with respect to federal government employees). … Malcolm Price, Inc. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 350 A.2d 730 (D.C.1976). 4 .

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Theus v. Internal Revenue Service

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 2015

    Defendants. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Kimely Lachell Theus, a resident of New York, filed a pro se complaint against The Board … Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972); Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008), plaintiff’s allegations in this case neither present a “federal question suitable for decision,” Best v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Howard E. Brady

    842 F.2d 1313 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 1, 1988

    This case arises out of events that took place on board Amtrak Train # 92 at Union Station, Washington, D.C. on March 23, 1987. Appellant Howard E. … See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 663 F.2d 229, 232 (D.C.Cir.1981) (en banc); see also United States v. Williams, 569 F.2d 823, 826 (5th Cir.1978).

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • Graves v. United States

    967 F. Supp. 572 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 25, 1997

    discriminatory discharge by NCIL, not a claim under § 1985(3). 1 He also may have alleged a claim of discriminatory failure-to-hire and retaliation by the United States Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board … Brown v. General Services Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1969 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System

    694 F.2d 281 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1982

    694 F.2d 281 224 U.S.App.D.C. 161 Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System 81-2071 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 11/2/82 D.C.D.C., 519 F.Supp. 602 AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Robert Larry Adams v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense

    420 F.2d 230 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 1970

    See Gold- *235 wasser v. Brown, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 222, n. 1 , 417 F.2d 1169 n. 1 (1969) ; Scott v. Macy [II], 131 U.S.App.D.C. 93 , 96 n. 6, 402 F.2d 644 , 647 n. 6 (1968) ; Con-nelly v. … Compare Scott v. Macy (II), n. 2 supra, and Norton v. Macy, n. 7 supra.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Tredway v. District of Columbia

    403 A.2d 732 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 19, 1979

    Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 507 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951). … See, e. g., Bailey v. United States, supra; United States v. Udy, supra; United States v. Browning, 359 F.2d 937 (10th Cir. 1966).

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Wadelton v. Department of State

    208 F. Supp. 3d 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2016

    Wadelton v. Department of State, 106 F. … and describing the procedures to be followed by the Wadelton reconstituted boards.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Melinda Birt v. Surface Transportation Board, Union Pacific Railroad Company and City of Nampa, Idaho, Intervenors

    90 F.3d 580 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 2, 1996

    As this court noted in Black v. … See, e.g., ICC v. Maine Cent. R.R. Co., 505 F.2d 590, 593-94 (2d Cir.1974); ICC v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R.R.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Beberman v. Blinken

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 2024

    Brown, No. 90-cv-2677 (RCL), 1991 WL 257973, at *1 (D.D.C. … Supp. 3d at 108 (reviewing final Grievance Board decision); Citizens Ass’n of Georgetown, Inc. v. Zoning Commission of D.C., 477 F.2d 402 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hunter v. Rubio

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 2026

    At this stage in the proceedings, and because Hunter proceeds pro se, the Court considers the factual allegations from all his filings, not just his opera- tive complaint. 1 Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. … Wiley v. Glassman, 511 F.3d 151, 155 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Lieberman

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2021

    Brown v. Colvin, 219 F. Supp. 3d 121, 125 (D.D.C. 2016) (quoting Broyles v. Astrue, 910 F. Supp. 2d 55, 60 (D.D.C. 2012)). … Supp. 2d at 1026 (citing Brown v. Dep’t of Navy, 229 F.3d 1356, 1358–59 (Fed Cir. 2000)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Andrew E. Hill and J.E. Pinkerton, United States of America v. Dennis Juren, United States of America v. Edward W. Cromey

    694 F.2d 258 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 9, 1982

    See Robertson v. Railroad Labor Board, 268 U.S. 619, 622 , 45 S.Ct. 621, 622 , 69 L.Ed. 111 (1925). … See FTC v. Browning, 435 F.2d at 100 ; accord FTC v. Jim Walter Corp., 651 F.2d 251, 254-55 (5th Cir.1981). 39 . See Robertson v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Building and Construction Trades Council of San Bernardino and Riverside Counties v. National Labor Relations Board

    328 F.2d 540 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 30, 1964

    See Radio Officers’ Union v. Labor Board, 347 U.S. 17, 48-49 , 74 S.Ct. 323 , 98 L.Ed. 455 (1954) ; Joy Silk Mills v. … National Labor Relations Board, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 360, 366 , 185 F.2d 732, 738 (1950), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 914 , 71 S.Ct. 734 , 95 L.Ed. 1350 (1951). 10 . Retail Clerks Union Local 770 v. N. L. R.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • INTERN. CITY MGT. ASS'N RET. CORP. v. Watkins

    726 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 17, 1989

    Brown v. Shimabukuro, 118 F.2d 17, 18 (D.C.Cir.1941). Here, the statements in the ICMA-RC complaint are directly related to its cause of action against Watkins. … Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1247 (D.C.App.1986); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 767, Comment d.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Stanton

    860 A.2d 369 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 2004

    V. Findings of Fact The Board sets out the Hearing Committee’s findings of fact here. This recitation also includes factual findings made by the Committee in its analysis of the record before it. … In re Brown, 617 A.2d 194, 199 (D.C.1992) (quoting In re Barton, 291 Md. 61 , 432 A.2d 1335, 1336 (1981)). Petitioner failed to produce any substantial evidence on this important element.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.