Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersTN

10,000+ results

2.22s

  • Exxon Corp. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County

    72 S.W.3d 638 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 19, 2002

    Defining “location” as the boundary lines of the property is not a workable definition when the Beer Board regulations require that distances be measured using the straight-line method between buildings. Cf. Watkins v. … See also Jon es v. S ullivan Coun ty Beer Board, 292 S.W.2d 185, 187 (Tenn. 1956)(adopting a straigh t-line m ethod of distance m easurem ent); Serv-U-Mart, Inc. v. Sullivan Coun ty, 527 S.W.2d 121, 123 (Tenn. 197 5).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Polk, Ricky v. Delta Faucet

    2019 TN WC 74 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 10, 2019

    Instead, the Board held that the Court had insufficient evidence to conclude Delta should have recorded the accident on May 22. However, the Board found that Mr. … Willis v. All Staff, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at *18 (Nov. 9, 2015); see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2018).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Citizens For Collierville, Inc., A Tennessee Corporation v. Town of Collierville

    977 S.W.2d 321 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 6, 1998

    Rains v. Knox County Board of Commissioners, C.A. No. 711, 1987 WL 18065, at *1 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 1987); See Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 511 (1975). … Id.; see also Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 (1972).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • John R. Fuller v. Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 19, 2020

    Brown intercepted and forged Fuller’s endorsement on the checks. … Brown’s violation of the TCPA. Plaintiff alleges Brown violated the TCPA by fraudulently endorsing and depositing two checks dated March 20, 2009.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Tommy William Davis - Concurring

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 28, 2003

    See, e.g., State v. Gonzalo Moran Garcia, No. M2000-01760-CCA-R3-CD, 2002 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 146, at *111 (Tenn. Crim. App. Nashville, Feb. 20, 2002); State v. Brown, 915 S.W.2d 3, 7-8 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). … Brown, 37 S.W.3d at 903 n.3.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Jeffrey Scott

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 14, 2011

    Brown’s house and was lying on the bed in Ms. Brown’s bedroom when the defendant arrived. Ms. Brown testified that the defendant “had been drinking” and “was in a rage.” … State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 550 (Tenn. 1992). “When the admission or exclusion of opinion evidence is challenged on appeal, it is reviewable only for abuse of discretion.” State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Morris v. Correctional Enterprises of TN.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 29, 1997

    , unique to the operations under the control of the board, a part of the executive service and under the exclusive control of the board." … Citing Goodwin, the Court of Appeals again reiterated its view that an appeal from an action from a board should not be joined with an original action in the trial court. State ex rel. Byram v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dennis, Chrostopher v. Memphis. Light, Gas & Water

    2020 TN WC 65 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 7, 2020

    Berdnik v. Fairfield Glade Cmty. Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32, at *10-11 (May 18, 2017). … Thompson v. Comcast Corp., 2018 TN Wik. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at *31 (Jan. 30, 2018). Although Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ballentine v. Mayor of Pulaski

    83 Tenn. 633 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1885

    Marr v. Enloe, 1 Yer., 454 ; Keesee v. District Board, 6 Cold., 127 ; Waterhouse v. Board, etc., 8 Heis., 857; Lipscomb v. Dean, 1 Lea, 546 . … Read, 13 Grat., 78; Kuhn v. Board of Education, 4 West Virginia, 499; State v. Sickles, 24 New Jersey, 135; Marks v. University, 37 Indiana, 155; Vanover v. Justices, 27 Georgia, 354.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Linnell Richmond and Shervon Johnson

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 15, 2001

    IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 24, 2001 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. … 5) whether the trial court erred in failing to allow the victim, Mose Cuxart, to be impeached with false statements concerning his income tax returns; 6) whether the trial court erred in admitting photographs of Shannon Brown

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rowell v. Dutton

    688 S.W.2d 474 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 9, 1985

    Adams v. Russell, 179 Tenn. 428 , 167 S.W.2d 5, 6 (1942). . [3-6] The power of the Governor to pardon, after conviction, is constitutional power. Article 3, § 6, Tennessee Constitution. … Bedford v. McCorkle, 163 Tenn. 101 , 40 S.W.2d 1015, 1016 (1931). The power resides in the Governor and can be exercised without reference to the Board of Paroles or anyone else. Smith v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Williams Lumber & Supply Co. v. Poarch

    221 Tenn. 540 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 10, 1968

    v. … Brown v. Brown & Co. (1941) 25 Tenn.App. 509 , 160 S.W.2d 431 , is not authority for such a view of the present case.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Austin v. Jennings

    211 Tenn. 485 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1963

    Queener v. Magnet Mills, Inc., supra, 179 Tenn. 422 , 167 S.W.2d 1 ; Anderson v. Aluminum Co. of America, supra. … City of Paris v. Paris-Henry County Public Utility District, 207 Tenn. 388, 398 , 340 S.W.2d 885, 890 ; Logan v. Reaves, 209 Tenn. 631, 638 , 354 S.W.2d 789 , and cases there cited.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • M. F. Parsley & Co. v. Cole & Miller

    1 Tenn. App. 714 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 13, 1926

    The buildings were duly accepted by the board and the board paid into Dr. Woodward’s hands the sum of $3,785.91, which was the balance of the contract prices of both buildings. … These sections have been under consideration by the Supreme Court in Hope v. Hamilton County, 17 Pickle, 325; Madison County v. Alexander, 8 Cates, 687 ; City of Knoxville v. Christenberry, 147 Tenn., 286 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re: Zachary G.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 2, 2012

    Means v. Ashby, 130 S.W.3d 48, 54 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003) (quoting Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(I)(1)). “‘[F]ew consequences of judicial action are so grave as the severance of natural family ties.’” M.L.B. v. … Code Ann. § 36-1-101(d); see also White v. Moody, 171 S.W.3d 187, 194 (Tenn. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Pierce

    138 S.W.3d 820 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 16, 2004

    See State v. Torres, 82 S.W.3d 236, 252 n.20 (Tenn. 2002); State v. Irick, 762 S.W.2d 121, 127 (Tenn. 1988); Grant v. State, 374 S.W.2d 391, 392 (Tenn. 1964); Marable v. State, 313 S.W.2d 451, 456 (Tenn. 1958); State v. … Recently, in State v.

    Cited 81 timesPublished
  • Torrie Schneider Longanacre v. Matthew Robert Longanacre - Dissent

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 16, 2013

    Code Ann. § 36-4-101(11) (Supp. 1999); Gardner v. Gardner, 104 Tenn. 410, 412, 58 S.W. 342, 343 (1900); Garvey v. Garvey, 29 Tenn. App. 291, 299-300, 203 S.W.2d 912, 916 (1946); White v. … P. 11 application filed); Brown v. Brown, No. 02A01-9108-CV-00168, 1992 WL 5243 at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 16, 1992) (no Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Charles Bobo v. State

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · May 26, 1999

    Whether the Tennessee Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530 (Tenn. 1992), should be applied retroactively to the petitioner’s case. … With respect to the petitioner’s claim pursuant to Brown, 836 2 S.W.2d at 530, the court concluded that, although the issue was not time-barred, Brown could not be applied

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Headley, Harry v. Roadstar, LLC

    2024 TN WC 60 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 22, 2024

    However, in Berdnik v. Fairfield Glade Community Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32, at *16 (May 18, 2017), the Appeals Board reversed the trial court’s order to authorize a panel. … LEXIS 53, at *10 (Sept. 12, 2017), the Board held the employer must submit a new panel if the original authorized doctor refused to treat the employee. In Baker v. Electrolux, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Currier v. Currier

    505 S.W.2d 724 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1974

    Appellant cites no authority to sustain his position and asserts that the only reported case having any bearing on the issue is Barber v. Barber, 28 Tenn.App. 559 , 192 S.W.2d 79 (1945). … Although neither party cites Brown v. Brown, 198 Tenn. 600 , 281 S.W.2d 492 (1955), we have given careful consideration to that opinion in arriving at our decision in this case.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.