Case law

Bayless v. Douglas County

57 Or. 301 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1910

Said board shall make alterations and changes in the same when petitioned so to do, in the manner hereinafter specified.” In School District v. … In Small v.

Simon v. PIE Nationwide, Inc.

142 Or. App. 411 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 31, 1996

Claimant next assigns error to the Board’s application of DIF’s standards under the temporary rules, which claimant challenges as improperly adopted. In Ferguson v. U.S. … SAIF concedes error under Gallino v.

SAIF Corp. v. Strubel

161 Or. App. 516 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 7, 1999

Dietz v. Ramuda, *521 130 Or App 397, 401 , 882 P2d 618 (1994), rev dismissed 321 Or 416 (1995). … See Uris v.

Martin v. City of Albany

320 Or. 175 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1994

In Gettman v. SAIF, 289 Or 609, 614 , 616 P2d 473 (1980), the Board had reduced a worker’s permanent disability award, because it found that he had a “potential” for retraining. … See also 1000 Friends v.

State v. Perrodin

315 Or. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 20, 2021

Brown, 96 Or App 171, 772 P2d 429 (1989), he contended that “[o]nce raised, this is on the State to prove the validity of that warrant.” … In State v.

Lewis v. CIGNA Insurance

339 Or. 342 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 2005

The Workers’ Compensation Board (board), in a divided decision, reversed the AL J’s order and approved the denial of the claim. The Court of Appeals affirmed the board’s decision. Lewis v. CIGNA Ins. … Insurer cross-petitioned, arguing that the board lacked authority to consider claimant’s challenge to the noncooperation denials. The Court of Appeals agreed with insurer. Lewis v. CIGNA Ins.

SAIF v. Ward

307 Or. App. 337 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 21, 2020

For the reasons described below, we affirm the board’s order. We review the board’s order pursuant to ORS 656.298(7)1 and ORS 183.482(8).2 Akins v. … See Comcast Corp. v.

Meyer v. Ford Industries, Inc.

50 Or. App. 249 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 1981

The Supreme Court in Brackhahn v. … The rule for relation back is explained in Brackhahn, 269 Or at 673 , and is reiterated in Campbell v.

Jansen v. Atiyeh

89 Or. App. 557 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 10, 1988

Jansen v. Atiyeh, 302 Or 314 , 728 P2d 1382 (1986).” 87 Or App at 619 n 4. The Board presents alternative arguments. … We conclude that, because of the defective appeal of the supplemental judgment awarding attorney fees, Jansen v.

International Paper Co. v. Wright

80 Or. App. 444 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 23, 1986

The Board’s December 27, 1984, order merely adhered to and republished the November 30 order on review; it did not “stay” the order on review or extend the time for seeking review. See Fischer v. … Shoulders v. SAIF, 300 Or 606 , 716 P2d 751 (1986) (when a claim is determined to be compensable, compensation is considered to have been awarded for the purpose of ORS 656.382(2)).

Greenbriar Ag Management v. Lemus

156 Or. App. 499 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 14, 1998

See Ebbtide Enterprises v. Tucker, 303 Or 459, 464 , 738 P2d 194 (1987). The Board explained: “It is apparent from the record that, at the time of the January 24 letter to Dr. … See Ebbtide Enterprises, 303 Or at 464-65 ; *505 SAIF v. Abbott, 103 Or App 49, 52-53 , 769 P2d 378 (1990); Newport Elks Club v. Hays, 92 Or App 604, 607 , 759 P2d 327 , rev den 307 Or 245 (1988).

United Parcel Service v. Likos

143 Or. App. 486 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 18, 1996

However, relying on Fossum, Bracke, and Progress Quarries v. … Compare Beneficiaries of Strametz; Bennett v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp., *491 128 Or App 71, 78 , 875 P2d 1176 (1994). 1 Accordingly, the Board erred in assigning responsibility to UPS.

Coleman v. Parry Center for Children

43 Or. App. 775 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 1979

Hage et ux v. Harvey et al, 210 Or 652, 656-57 , 313 P2d 448 (1957); Marshall v. Strauss, 160 Or 265, 274 , 84 P2d 502 (1938); Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. Toliver, 152 Or 185, 193 , 52 P2d 1129 (1936); Ramsey v. … Bessler v. Derby, supra.

Maddox v. Clackamas County School District No. 25

51 Or. App. 639 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 13, 1981

There is no review of the reason for discharge, or the good faith of the board. 4 In Henthorn v. … See Brooks v. Dierker, 275 Or 619 , 552 P2d 533 (1976); Jordan v. City Council of Lake Oswego, 49 Or App 31 , 618 P2d 1298 (1980), rev den (1981). Count I was properly dismissed.

SAIF Corp. v. Nehl

148 Or. App. 101 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 21, 1997

(the Board), which adopted and affirmed the ALJ’s order. … The Board is correct. The statute provides that the on-the-job injury must be the major contributing cause of the need for treatment, not the major contributing cause of the combined condition. Accord Robinson v.

Bear Creek Plaza, Ore., Ltd. v. Department of Revenue

12 Or. Tax 272 · Oregon Tax Court · Sep 17, 1992

Widmer, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev., 261 Or 371, 374 , 494 P2d 854 (1972) (quoting Citizens’ Nat. Bk. v. Board of Equalization, 109 Or 669 , 222 P 341 (1924)). … Although there is no definition of “parcel,” in First Interstate Bank v.

Mills v. Boeing Co.

212 Or. App. 678 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 16, 2007

As we explained in Columbia Forest Products v. … The board therefore did not err under Altamirano by concluding that the denial had legal effect. Claimant also argues that the board impermissibly departed from George C. McCoy, 50 Van Natta 49 (1998). See Hays v.

Parker v. Norton

143 Or. 165 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1933

See Brennecke v. Ganahl Lumber Co. (Mo.), 44 S. W. (2d) 627 ; State ex rel. Brown v. Trimble, 324 Mo. 353 ( 23 S. W. (2d) 162 ); *172 Robinson v. Meek, 203 Iowa 185 ( 210 N. W. 762 ). … In Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 ( 222 N. W. 192 ), plaintiff was injured by falling from a box while attempting to pry off a board by the use of a wrecking *175 bar.

Hearthstone Manor v. Stuart

192 Or. App. 153 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 2004

The Workers’ Compensation Board (the board) concluded that the injury was compensable. … McTaggart v.

City of Lake Oswego v. $23,232.23 in Cash

140 Or. App. 520 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 1996

Co., 153 Or 152, 158 , 56 P2d 318 (1936); Stokes v. Brown, 20 Or 530, 532 , 26 P 561 (1891). … Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95, 100 , 570 P2d 52 (1977).