Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.35s
Williams v. District of Columbia Department of General Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 2024
Simpson were on the brief for appellee Public Employee Relations Board. Before EASTERLY, MCLEESE, and SHANKER, Associate Judges. … (quoting Brown v. Plant, 157 A.2d 289, 291 (D.C. 1960))); D.C. App. R. 16(b) (allowing parties to supplement the record “at any time” by stipulation).
Cited 0 timesPublished470 A.2d 272 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1983
The Board recommends suspension for a year and a day. We adopt the Board’s recommendation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED by the court that respondent John J. … In re Brown, Bar Docket Nos. 305-77, et al.; In re Guhring, Bar Docket No. 398-78; In re Mizel, Bar Docket No. 77-74, all also involve simple neglect in violation of DR 6-101(A)(3) and resulted in public censures.
Cited 21 timesPublished679 F.3d 924 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 25, 2012
Before: BROWN and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge. … Kreis v. Sec’y of the Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1513 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (citing Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 303 (1983)); see also 10 Dickson v.
Cited 66 timesPublished365 F.2d 960 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 21, 1966
We think this case is governed by Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 U.S. 41 , 58 S.Ct. 459 , 82 L.Ed. 638 (1938). … There the Supreme Court held that a United States District Court had no jurisdiction to enjoin the Board from holding a hearing, and reiterated the following language from its decision in National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedThomas R. Jones v. United States
127 A.3d 1173 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 2015
Brown’s body during an autopsy. … Brown and Mr. Stuckey.
Cited 19 timesPublishedCohen v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 24, 2018
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) ROBERT COHEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … ) Civil Action No. 14-754(EGS) ) BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ) UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT ) OF COLUMBIA, et al., ) )
Cited 0 timesPublished459 F.2d 1143 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 1972
N.L.R.B. v. Mechanical and Allied Production Workers, Local 444, supra, 427 F.2d at 884-885 ; N.L.R.B. v. Granite State Joint Board, Textile Workers Union, Local 1029, supra, 446 F.2d at 372 . … N.L.R.B., 321 U.S. 702, 704 , 64 S.Ct. 817 , 88 L.Ed. 1020 (1944) ; Fibre-board Paper Products Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 379 U.S. 203, 215-217 , 85 S.Ct. 398 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 (1964). See also N.L.R.B. v.
Cited 14 timesPublished455 F.2d 1340 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 1, 1971
of Reading and Wakefield, Massachusetts v. … Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v.
Cited 17 timesPublished24 F. Supp. 3d 76 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 10, 2014
See, e.g., Brown v. Children’s Nat. Med. … First, if the Board and University are identical parties, then claims against the Board are duplicative of and merge with those against the University. Cf. Campbell v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedCobell Ex Rel. Cobell v. Jewell
234 F. Supp. 3d 126 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 2017
See Cobell v. Norton, 231 F. … See Cobell v. Norton, 407 F.
Cited 15 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2009
In Brown v. Tomlison, 462 F. … There is no reason for this Court to stray from the well-reasoned decision in Brown.
Cited 0 timesPublishedResolution Trust Corp. v. Lechase
886 F. Supp. 108 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 24, 1995
Browning, 435 F.2d 96 (D.C.Cir.1970), the Federal Election Commission Act, Federal Election Commission v. … See Agnew v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve Sys., 153 F.2d 785, 788 (D.C.Cir.)
Cited 1 timesPublished279 F. 188 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 1922
Ed. 1146 ; Roth v. District of Columbia, 16 App. D. C. 323; Brown v. District of Columbia, 29 App. D. C. 273, 25 L. R. A. (N. S.) 98; District of Columbia v. Tyrrell, 41 App. D. C. 463; Coates v. … “For the acts and omissions of its officers and agents in the exercise of powers of the former class, such as * * * the power through its board of health or other agency to protect its inhabitants against disease and un-,
Cited 10 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. Lang Body Co. of Delaware v. Board of Tax Appeals
29 F.2d 437 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 20, 1928
The relator’s petition seeks the issuance of a writ of prohibition to restrain the Board of Tax Appeals from taking certain official action, and the immediate question is whether a rule to show cause shall issue to the respondents … Morris v. Scott, 25 App. D. C. 88; United States ex rel., Holmead v. Barnard, 29 App. D. C. 431. The petition is accordingly dismissed, with costs.
Cited 1 timesPublished745 F.2d 677 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 2, 1984
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 516 F.2d 1229 (D.C.Cir.1975); Association of Bank Travel Bureaus v. … Public Systems v.
Cited 23 timesPublished8 F.3d 832 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 12, 1993
The Board, however, has the authority to interpret collective bargaining agreements in order to resolve unfair labor practice cases. See NLRB v. … See Hammontree, 925 F.2d at 1490-91 (discussing Board’s deference policies); see also American Freight System, Inc. v.
Cited 67 timesPublished302 F.2d 186 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 8, 1962
Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, T.I.L. Sportswear Corporation, Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. T.I.L. … N.L.R.B. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedGreene v. Real Estate Commission
218 A.2d 508 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1966
Board of Medical Supervisors, 25 App.D.C. 443 (1905), relied on by petitioner, which reversed an order of the medical board revoking the license of a physician to practice medicine in the District of Columbia because of “ … In Brown v. Winston, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 58 , 197 F.2d 601 (1952), the United States Court of Appeals upheld the suspension of a broker’s license under this subsection without discussion of its validity. 5 . See Ladrey v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedRobert Larry Adams v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense
420 F.2d 230 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 1970
See Gold- *235 wasser v. Brown, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 222, n. 1 , 417 F.2d 1169 n. 1 (1969) ; Scott v. Macy [II], 131 U.S.App.D.C. 93 , 96 n. 6, 402 F.2d 644 , 647 n. 6 (1968) ; Con-nelly v. … Compare Scott v. Macy (II), n. 2 supra, and Norton v. Macy, n. 7 supra.
Cited 25 timesPublishedFrederick A. R. Drew v. U. S. Department of the Navy and Merit Systems Protection Board
672 F.2d 197 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 5, 1982
Subsequently the Board reopened the appeal pending a determination in Wells v. Harris (J.A. 210). … On this point the Board held in Andrade v. Department of the Air Force, MSPB Docket Nos.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna