Case law

City of Portland v. Welch

154 Or. 286 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 20, 1936

In Pearce v. … Excise Board, 156 Okla. 192 ( 10 P. (2d) 403 ); City of Ardmore v. Excise Board, *307 supra; Excise Board v. Reid, 143 Okla. 204 ( 288 P. 458 ). Tallon v.

SAIF Corp. v. Orr

101 Or. App. 612 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 23, 1990

Grant v. State Industrial Acc. Com., 102 Or at 45; see 1 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law [§ 13.22].’ ” 296 Or at 251 . The Board considered the relevant factors. … It has been held that the Board must make express findings on that issue. SAIF v. Stephen, 308 Or 41,47-48 , 774 P2d 1103 (1989).

State v. Morgan

316 Or. 553 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1993

State v. Morgan, 116 Or App 338, 345 , 842 P2d 406 (1992). We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, in part on different grounds. … See State v. Davis, 315 Or 484, 486-88 , 847 P2d 834 (1993), for an explanation of the system. A sentenced defendant serves the time, with no early release on parole other than for good time served.

Campbell v. Aldrich

159 Or. 208 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1938

The New Jersey court (Phelps v. Board of Education, 115 N. J. … Note the distinction which the court makes in the Brand case between that and Phelps v. Board of Education, supra. Groves v. Board of Education, 367 Ill. 91 (10 N.

State v. Perrodin

315 Or. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 20, 2021

Brown, 96 Or App 171, 772 P2d 429 (1989), he contended that “[o]nce raised, this is on the State to prove the validity of that warrant.” … In State v.

Lewis v. CIGNA Insurance

339 Or. 342 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 2005

The Workers’ Compensation Board (board), in a divided decision, reversed the AL J’s order and approved the denial of the claim. The Court of Appeals affirmed the board’s decision. Lewis v. CIGNA Ins. … Insurer cross-petitioned, arguing that the board lacked authority to consider claimant’s challenge to the noncooperation denials. The Court of Appeals agreed with insurer. Lewis v. CIGNA Ins.

Richards v. City of Portland

121 Or. 340 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1927

As stated in Spear v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Meyer v. Ford Industries, Inc.

50 Or. App. 249 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 1981

The Supreme Court in Brackhahn v. … The rule for relation back is explained in Brackhahn, 269 Or at 673 , and is reiterated in Campbell v.

Providence Health System Oregon v. Walker

269 Or. App. 404 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 25, 2015

Our prior opinion explains the contentious procedural history of this workers’ compensation claim, which dates back to April 2004, see Walker v. … Relying on our prior opinion in Providence Health System v.

SAIF Corp. v. Severson

109 Or. App. 136 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 2, 1991

Harrington v. Board of Trustees, 100 Or App 733, 738 , 788 P2d 1019 , rev den 310 Or 133 (1990); Saxton v. SAIF, 80 Or App 631 , 723 P2d 355 , rev den 302 Or 159 (1986). … ORS 656.283(2) limits the Board’s authority to modify the Director’s decision.

Coleman v. Parry Center for Children

43 Or. App. 775 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 1979

Hage et ux v. Harvey et al, 210 Or 652, 656-57 , 313 P2d 448 (1957); Marshall v. Strauss, 160 Or 265, 274 , 84 P2d 502 (1938); Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. Toliver, 152 Or 185, 193 , 52 P2d 1129 (1936); Ramsey v. … Bessler v. Derby, supra.

SAIF Corp. v. Nehl

148 Or. App. 101 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 21, 1997

(the Board), which adopted and affirmed the ALJ’s order. … The Board is correct. The statute provides that the on-the-job injury must be the major contributing cause of the need for treatment, not the major contributing cause of the combined condition. Accord Robinson v.

Poppleton v. Yamhill County

8 Or. 337 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1880

Rhea, appellant, v. Umatilla County, 2 Oregon, 298. In that case it was held that such board was a tribunal whose decisions are subject to be reviewed, and we think that decision correct. … The security was greatly disproportioned to the. amount of money borrowed, which may have been taken as a circumstance by the board.

Bear Creek Plaza, Ore., Ltd. v. Department of Revenue

12 Or. Tax 272 · Oregon Tax Court · Sep 17, 1992

Widmer, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev., 261 Or 371, 374 , 494 P2d 854 (1972) (quoting Citizens’ Nat. Bk. v. Board of Equalization, 109 Or 669 , 222 P 341 (1924)). … Although there is no definition of “parcel,” in First Interstate Bank v.

State v. Cooper

7 Or. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 19, 1971

All the officer could observe at this time of the contents of the bag was, a greenish-brown colored substance through the clear plastic. Defendant gave the officer his identification. … Henry v. United States, 361 US 98 , 80 S Ct 168 , 4 L Ed 2d 134 (1959); State v. Cloman, 254 Or 1 , 456 P2d 67 (1969). We think there was probable cause for the seizure.

Parker v. Norton

143 Or. 165 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1933

See Brennecke v. Ganahl Lumber Co. (Mo.), 44 S. W. (2d) 627 ; State ex rel. Brown v. Trimble, 324 Mo. 353 ( 23 S. W. (2d) 162 ); *172 Robinson v. Meek, 203 Iowa 185 ( 210 N. W. 762 ). … In Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 ( 222 N. W. 192 ), plaintiff was injured by falling from a box while attempting to pry off a board by the use of a wrecking *175 bar.

Wood v. Lost Lake Manufacturing Co.

23 Or. 20 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1890

In Lone Association v. Stonemetz, 29 Pa. … Co. v. Ketcham, 27 Conn. 170 .

Hearthstone Manor v. Stuart

192 Or. App. 153 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 2004

The Workers’ Compensation Board (the board) concluded that the injury was compensable. … McTaggart v.

WSB INVESTMENTS, LLC v. Pronghorn Development Co.

269 Or. App. 342 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 25, 2015

See Howard v. … See also Keller v.

Nation v. Oregon Racing Commission

21 Or. App. 685 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 16, 1975

Campbell v. Bd. of Medical Exam., 16 Or App 381 , 518 P2d 1042 (1973), Sup Ct review denied (1974). … Remodeling Consult. v. Builders Bd., 19 Or App 794 , 528 P2d 1373 (1974), Sup Ct review denied (1975). Affirmed.