Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersME

9,550 results

0.46s

  • Hall v. Internet Capital Group, Inc.

    338 F. Supp. 2d 145 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 1, 2004

    Cone Mem’l Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. … Co. v. C.A.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Toomey v. City of Portland

    396 A.2d 1029 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 26, 1979

    Matthews v. R. T. … See also Mullen v. Brown Homes, Inc., Me., 358 A.2d 557, 560 (1976) (“The Commissioner has, . . . obviously, no equitable powers.”); Waltz v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Carleton v. Inhabitants of Caribou

    88 Me. 461 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 15, 1896

    Spaulding v. Winslow, 74 Maine, 528. It had more than a casual or accidental connection with the injury. … The same distinction was observed in Aldrich v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ricker v. Moore

    77 Me. 292 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 20, 1885

    Linscott v. Buck, 33 Maine, 530; Green v. Smith, 1 Atk. 572; Broome v. Monck, 10 Ves. 597 ; Hadley v. Bank, 3 DeG. J. & S. 63 ; Pom. Eq. § § 368 et seq.; Rose v. Watson, 10 H. L. Cas. 672, 678; Lysaght v. Edwards, L. … Seton v. Slade, 7 Ves. 265; Champion v. Brown, 6 Johns. Ch. 398, 403 . And notice thereof to Moore would constitute him the trustee of Mrs. Niles. Story, Eq. § 789.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cole v. Fickett

    95 Me. 265 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 19, 1901

    Andrews v. Andrews, 81 Maine, 339; Cross v. Bean, 81 Maine, 529. As this suit is not between the parties to the deed to Fred E. … Pomeroy’s Equity, § 981; De Riemer v. De Cantillon, 4 Johns. Ch. 90 ; Perry on Trusts, § 186; Gillespie v. Moon, 2 Johns. Ch. 585 ; Brown v. Lamphear, 35 Vt. 252 ; Loss v. Obrey, 7 C. E. Green, 52; Farley v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • DiMillo v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America

    789 F. Supp. 2d 194 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 2, 2011

    S.M.B.W. v. … The *211 Board of Directors shall act as the insurance trustee.”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Toralf H. Strand v. Sabrina Velandry

    228 A.3d 157 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 31, 2020

    Brown Dev. Corp. v. Hemond, 2008 ME 146, ¶ 11, 956 A.2d 104. [¶7] Here, Strand admitted that there was no writing memorializing Velandry’s alleged promise to pay him $125,000 for her interest in the property. … Bradford v. Dumond, 675 A.2d 957, 961 (Me. 1996).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.

    125 Me. 350 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 8, 1926

    Lane v. Railway Co., (Iowa), 180 N. W., 899 . The cases cited in the briefs are not precisely in point, nor are they claimed so to be by counsel. Ingersoll v. Railway Co., 157 N. … The appellant owning a station and other structures in Quincy was taxed by the local assessors and also by the State Board. It was hable to be taxed by one, not by both.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lingley v. Stuart Shaines, Inc. (In Re Acme-Dunham Inc.)

    50 B.R. 734 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 12, 1985

    See In re Brown, 20 B.R. 554 (Rkrtcy.S.D.N.Y.1982). … The Court, therefore, will deny Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII. V.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc. v. Monahan

    21 F. Supp. 535 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 15, 1937

    Co. v. … Michigan Transit Corp’n v. Brown, D. C., 56 F.2d 200, 202 , and cases cited. Del Vecchio v. Bowers, 296 U.S. 280 , 56 S.Ct. 190 , 80 L.Ed. 229 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Southern Maine Landlord Ass. v. The City of Portland, Maine

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 2, 2021

    Waterville Hotel Corp. v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 241 A.2d 50, 52 (Me. 1968)(emphasis added). … The Law Court first applied the unlawful delegation doctrine in Waterville Hotel Corp. v. Board of Zoning Appeals.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cooper v. Maine Dep't of Environmental Protection

    Superior Court of Maine · Feb 8, 2022

    Stein v. M'a.ine Criminal Justice Academy, 20141vffi 82, <[ 11. 15. When the under igned reviews an ag ncy's fa tual findings, this Court cannot substitute its judgment for that of tbe Board. Duffy v. … AFSCME Council 93 v. Maine Labor Relations Board, 678 A.2d 591, 593 (Me. 1996); Nelson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Town of Fayette v. Manter

    528 A.2d 887 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 30, 1987

    See Caporino v. … See Browne v. Connor, 138 Me. 63, 67-68 , 21 A.2d 709, 710 (1941). The term "public easement” is now defined in 23 M.R.S.A. § 3021(2) (1980).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. City of Biddeford

    364 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 5, 2005

    Browning Ferris Indus., 160 F.3d 839, 841-42 (1st Cir.1998)(quoting Nat’l Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 735 (1st Cir.1995)). … FDIC v. Anchor Props., 13 F.3d 27, 30 (1st Cir.1994) (citing Darr v. Muratore, 8 F.3d 854, 859 (1st Cir.1993)). II.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • David A. Jones v. Secretary of State

    239 A.3d 628 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 1, 2020

    See Buckley v. Am. Const. L. Found., Inc., 525 U.S. 182, 186-87, 192-97 (1999); McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, 514 U.S. 334, 344-45 (1995); Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U.S. 428, 433-34 (1992); Anderson v. … Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 (1974). [¶8] As to Jones’s argument that an affidavit alone would be sufficient to establish residency, we reiterate the significance of simple and timely verification of residency.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Maples v. Compass Harbor Village

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 30, 2022

    BROWN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. … Brown et al. v. Compass Harbor Village Condominium Association, et al., 2020 ME 44, 229 A.3d 158); and the Order Following Bench Trial, Charles R. Maples, et al. v. Evan Contorakes, et al., Docket No.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Bridge v. City of Westbrook

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 14, 2023

    Aydelott v. City of Portland, 2010 ME 25, { 10, 990 A.2d 1024. The party seeking to vacate the decision has the burden of persuasion. Friends of Lamoine v. Town of Lamoine, 2020 ME 70, § 20, 234 A.3d 214. … Town of North Haven, 2017 ME 114, 4 15, 163 A.3d 835 (quoting Bizier v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Carey v. Town of Rumford

    Superior Court of Maine · Nov 17, 2021

    (quoting Osprey Family Tr. v. Town ofOwls 5 Head, 2016 l\.1E 89, 12, 141 A.3d 1114). The Court may not substitute its judgment for that of the Board. Tarason v. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Catholic Charities of Maine, Inc. v. City of Portland

    304 F. Supp. 2d 77 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 6, 2004

    The corporation’s members, in turn, vote to approve members of the Board of Directors. Id. ¶ 47 . Thus, the Bishop of Portland essentially controls the Board of Directors. … In Bagley v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Inhabitants of Cumberland Co. v. Pennell

    69 Me. 357 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 21, 1879

    Browning v. Hanford, 5 Hill (N. Y.), 588. S. C. in error, 5 Denio, 586 , and cases cited in the chancellor’s opinion. Moore v. Westervelt, 21 N. Y. 103 . Phillips v. Lamar, 27 Ga. 228 . … S. v. Thomas, 15 Wall. 354. To a similar purport, see opinion of Cowen, J., in Browning v. Hanford, 5 Hill (N. Y.), 591.

    Cited 18 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.