Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMA

10,000+ results

2.29s

  • Massachusetts Board of Higher Education v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 93

    29 Mass. L. Rptr. 433 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Feb 28, 2012

    Massachusetts Board of Higher Education v. Massachusetts Teachers Assoc., 79 Mass.App.Ct. 27, 31 (2011) (“Mass Board”) (internal citations and quotations omitted). … of Higher Education v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ING Principal Protection Funds Derivative Litigation

    369 F. Supp. 2d 163 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 9, 2005

    The Independent Trustees’ Motion to Dismiss is ALLOWED as to Count V. In addition, Defendants move to dismiss Counts II and IV because Plaintiffs, again, failed to make pre-suit demand on the Board of Trustees. … Brown, 431 Mass. 838 , 730 N.E.2d 859, 865 (2000) ("The rationale behind the demand requirement is that, as a basic principle of corporate governance, the board of directors or majority of shareholders should set the corporation's

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • TIMOTHY BURKE, Trustee v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF DENNIS.

    Massachusetts Appeals Court · Aug 19, 2025

    See Leominster Materials Corp. v. Board of Appeals of Leominster, 42 Mass. App. Ct. 458, 461 (1997) ("court cannot read into the ordinance an unexpressed exception"). … See Warren v. Board of Appeals of Amherst, 383 Mass. 1, 9 (1981), citing Charter v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Arthur D. Little, Inc. v. East Cambridge Savings Bank

    35 Mass. App. Ct. 734 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jan 13, 1994

    Compare Lewis v. Emerson, 391 Mass. 517, 519-520 (1984) (separate document requirement met where “judgment” portion of findings and rulings was visually distinct); Brown v. Quinn, 27 Mass. App. … Tausevich v. Board of Appeals of Stoughton, 402 Mass. 146, 148 (1988). Cf. Olsen v. Olsen, 294 Mass. 507, 508 (1936).

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Morse v. Massachusetts Nat. Bank

    17 F. Cas. 865 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Mar 15, 1873

    Browne, St. Frauds, §§ 172, 174; Quin v. Hanford, 1 Hill, 82 ; Pike v. Irwin, 1 Sandf. 14 ; Pillans v. Van Mierop, Burrows, 1663; Johnson v. Collings, 1 East, 98; Curtis v. … Brown, 5 Cush. 488 , and cases cited; Dexter v. Blanchard, 11 Allen, 365 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Johnson Steel & Wire Co., Inc.

    61 B.R. 203 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · May 23, 1986

    Brown (collectively the “Claimants”). The Claimants have filed motions for partial summary judgment which have been previously denied by the Court. … See, Murphy v. Heppenstall Co., 635 F.2d 233, 235 (3rd Cir.1980) (wherein provisions purporting to limit employer’s liability were less than clear). Unlike in Hoefel v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • JOHN F. LINHARES & Others v. PLANNING BOARD OF DENNIS & Others.

    Massachusetts Appeals Court · May 22, 2026

    Ct. 355, 362 (2019), quoting Bateman v. Board of 8 Appeals of Georgetown, 56 Mass. App. Ct. 236, 242 (2002). … Board of Appeals of Duxbury, 347 Mass. 690, 692 (1964), quoting Prusik v. Board of Appeal of Boston, 262 Mass. 451, 458 (1928).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • SANFORD FEMAN & Another v. BOARD OF APPEALS OF CONCORD & Another.

    Massachusetts Appeals Court · May 28, 2026

    Allegaert v. Harbor View Hotel Owner LLC, 100 Mass. App. Ct. 483, 486 (2021), quoting 311 West Broadway LLC v. Board of Appeal of Boston, 90 Mass. App. Ct. 68, 73 (2016). … Id. at 325, quoting Carr v. Board of Appeals of Saugus, 361 Mass. 361, 363 (1972).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Coe v. Coe

    313 Mass. 232 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 23, 1943

    But it was said in Brown v. … See Burrows v. Purple, 107 Mass. 428, 435 ; Smith v. Smith, 190 Mass. 573, 575 ; Brown v. Brown, 222 Mass. 415, 416, 418 ; Commonwealth v. Whiston, 306 Mass. 65, 66 .

    Cited 72 timesPublished
  • Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers v. Belanger

    District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 10, 2020

    Inc. v. Thompson, 478 U.S. 804, 808 (1986); see also Banco Popular de Puerto Rico v. Ramirez, 280 F. … Alaska Bar Ass’n v. Dickerson, 240 F.Supp. 732, 734 (D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Commonwealth v. Zorrilla

    38 Mass. App. Ct. 77 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jan 27, 1995

    See Horneman v. Brown, 286 Mass. 65, 71 (1934); Massachusetts Bay Transp. Authy. v. Massachusetts Bay Transp. Authy. … See Commonwealth v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Walters

    479 Mass. 277 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 4, 2017

    He also argues that his sentence was illegal because the resentencing judge did not properly apply our holding in Brown v. … Ct. 31 , 34-35, 775 N.E.2d 426 (2002) ( Brown and Manning v. Superintendent, Mass.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Opinion of the Justices to the Senate

    282 Mass. 619 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 17, 1933

    Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 . Fairbank v. United States, 181 U. S. 283, 294-300 . … As in Hylton v. United States, 3 Dallas, 171 , on the use of carriages; in Nicol v. Ames, 173 U. S. 509 , on sales at exchanges or boards of trade; in Knowlton v. Moore, 178 U.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Seventy-Eight Bales of Cotton

    21 F. Cas. 1100 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 15, 1865

    Adm. 243, where the officers and crew of a British frigate who had been saved from shipwreck and brought into Yarmouth by a neutral vessel with enemy cargo on board, proceeded against the vessel and cargo as prize, the court … Brown v. U. S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Ass'n of Government Employees, Local R1-162 v. Labor Relations Commission

    17 Mass. App. Ct. 542 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Mar 2, 1984

    Brown, J. The plaintiff (union) filed a charge of a prohibited practice with the Labor Relations Commission (commission), alleging that the Weymouth school committee (committee) had violated G. … See Labor Relations Commn. v. Natick, 369 Mass. 431, 438 (1976).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Fitzgerald v. Beckwith

    182 Mass. 177 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 30, 1902

    Brown, trustee. Mr. Brown died in the spring of 1897 and the defendant was appointed his successor in the trust. … The defendant relies upon Murphy v. Barnard, 162 Mass. 72 , Biggerstaff v. Marston, 161 Mass. 101 , and Baxter v. Little, 6 Met. 7 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Martin

    358 Mass. 282 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 3, 1970

    and disguised; breaking and entering the dwelling house of Brown in the nighttime while armed, with the intent to commit a felony, and assault on Brown; and assault and battery on Brown. … Lolos v. Berlin, 338 Mass. 10, 13-14 . The evidence tending to prove that the defendant was one of the two persons who robbed Brown was in very large part circumstantial.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Hogan

    17 Mass. App. Ct. 186 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Dec 6, 1983

    Present: BROWN, PERRETTA, & SMITH, JJ. Daniel E. Callahan for the defendant. Dyanne Klein Polatin, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth. SMITH, J. … BROWN, J. (concurring in result).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown

    District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 6, 2026

    Brown’s review for out of state placement was conducted by the DOC Classification Board and ultimately decided by the Central Classification Department. [SOF ¶ 67; ECF No. 76-11 (“SOF Ex. 14”)]. … Brown’s review for out of state placement was conducted by the DOC classification board and central classification, which is a separate process from inmate grievance reviews. [SOF ¶ 67; SOF Ex. 14].

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Robertson

    273 Mass. 66 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 8, 1930

    Chamberlain v. Henry, 263 Mass. 63, 65 . Goodman v. Goldman, 265 Mass. 85, 87, 88 . Brown v. Little, Brown & Co. (Inc.) 269 Mass. 102, 105 . The motion to recommit was properly denied as to the second ground. … Upon the facts found the defendants were rightly adjudged to be indebted to The Brown Company, Inc., in the sum stated, and Murphy was rightly adjudged to hold the stock in trust for The Brown Company, Inc. Boston v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.