Case law

State v. Brown

156 Or. App. 394 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 1998

State v. Ready, 323 Or 645 , 919 P2d 495 (1996); State v. Stoneman, 323 Or 536 , 920 P2d 535 (1996).

Davidson v. Brown

155 Or. App. 256 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 15, 1998

Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc., 144 Or App 52, 79 , 925 P2d 107 (1996), rev allowed 325 Or 438 (1997); Tenold v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 127 Or App 511, 524-25 , 873 P2d 413 , rev dismissed 321 Or 561 (1995).

State v. Brown

122 Or. App. 632 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 1993

See State v. Crotsley, 308 Or 272 , 779 P2d 600 (1989). Defendant’s remaining assignment of error does not require discussion. Remanded for resentencing.

State v. Brown

116 Or. App. 233 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 4, 1992

State v. Serheinko, 111 Or App 604 , 826 P2d 114 (1992). Defendant failed to preserve his claim that the court erred in finding that he was armed with a weapon during the commission of the offense.

Brown v. SAIF

Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 2017

Throughout this opinion we use “combined condition” as the same shorthand phrase for both. 244 Brown v. SAIF court and this one. Brown v. … See, e.g., Luckhurst v. Bank of 256 Brown v.

Brown v. Comerford

99 Or. App. 60 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 25, 1989

Brown is an abnormally dangerous activity. … As the court said in Koos v.

State v. Brown

117 Or. App. 551 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 6, 1993

State v. Bomar, 79 Or App 451 , 719 P2d 76 (1986). We need not reach defendant’s remaining assignments of error. Reversed and remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Wm. Brown & Co. v. Duda

91 Or. 402 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1919

The right to prove such a fact by parol testimony is sustained by the opinion of this court in Barbre v. Goodale, 28 Or. 465 ( 38 Pac. 67 , 43 Pac. 378 ).

Brown v. Maass

116 Or. App. 508 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 18, 1992

Boone v. Wright, 314 Or 135 , 836 P2d 727 (1992). Reconsideration allowed; decision withdrawn; reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

State v. Brown

114 Or. App. 423 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 22, 1992

State v. Rice, 114 Or App 101 , 836 P2d 731 (1992).

Brown v. Zenon

105 Or. App. 531 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 6, 1991

Bird v. Maass (A64583), 104 Or App 271 , 800 P2d 792 (1990). Reconsideration allowed; former decision withdrawn; reversed and remanded.

Brown v. Brune

98 Or. App. 633 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 11, 1989

Ford v. Blinn, 50 Or App 515, 519 , 623 P2d 1110 , rev den 290 Or 853 (1981).

Brown v. A-Dec, Inc.

154 Or. App. 244 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 3, 1998

Because claimant’s claim is not precisely based on a worsening of a preexisting condition, she contends that the Board erred in applying the test for compensability set out in ORS 656.802(2)(b). … We considered and rejected that contention in Bailey v. Reynolds Metals, 153 Or App 498 , 959 P2d 84 (1998). Affirmed.

Brown v. City of Medford

251 Or. App. 42 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 5, 2012

First Lutheran Church v. … Co. v. Chicago, 166 US 226, 241 , 17 S Ct 581 , 41 L Ed 979 (1897).

State v. Brown

70 Or. App. 707 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 7, 1984

Although a trial court’s decision whether to admit or refuse evidence is generally a matter of discretion, State v. … See ORS 135.037; State v. Browder, 69 Or App 564 , 687 P2d 168 (1984). Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Laurance v. Brown

94 Or. 387 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1919

Dec. 140 ); Hough v. Porter, 51 Or. 318, 421 ( 95 Pac. 732 , 98 Pac. 1083 , 102 Pac. 728 ). … Laws of Oregon 1913, p. 531; Hill v. American Land & Livestock Co., 82 Or. 202, 209 ( 161 Pac. 403 ).

Brown v. Almasie

91 Or. 668 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1919

Heath v. … Brown and Hunziker for their joint benefit.”

Brown v. Farmers' Supply Co.

23 Or. 541 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1893

It is essential to the proper execution of a deed or mortgage by a corporation, that it be done in the name of and on behalf of the corporation, and under its corporate seal: Devlin, Deeds, § 334; Eagle Woolen Mills Co. v. … Helens Mill Co. 3 Saw. 88 ; Brinley v. Mann,, 2 Cush. 337 . The mortgage in this case is not executed, nor does it purport to be executed, by or in behalf of the Farmers’ Supply Depot Company. It is executed by F. S.

Brown v. Baker

62 Or. App. 395 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 1983

ORS 19.010(2)(c); Kuvaas v. Cutrell, 50 Or App 529 , 623 P2d 1116 (1980). Appeal dismissed.

Brown v. Baker

67 Or. App. 283 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 7, 1984

White, 179 Or 490 , 172 P2d 822 (1946), and Barnum v. Lockhart, 75 Or 528 , 146 P 975 (1915). … See Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation, 284 Or 695, 700 , 588 P2d 1100 (1978).