Opinion

Brown v. Maass

  • 116 Or. App. 508
  • 840 P.2d 1393
  • 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2205
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Nov 18, 1992
Status
Published
On the bench
Deits, Durham, Richardson
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.1%

The opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner petitions for Supreme Court review. We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, allow it and reverse the judgment.

Petitioner’s petition for post-conviction relief was dismissed by the trial court, because it was not timely filed under ORS 138.510(2)(b). We affirmed that judgment, because the petition for post-conviction relief was filed more than 120 days after the time limit in ORS 138.510(2)(b) became effective. We were held to be wrong in doing that. Boone v. Wright, 314 Or 135 , 836 P2d 727 (1992).

Reconsideration allowed; decision withdrawn; reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.