Case law

State v. Brown

18 S.W.3d 482 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2000

Defendant, George Brown, was charged with possession of a prohibited article, a homemade knife, on the premises of a correctional center, in violation of Section 217.360(4) RSMo (Cum.Supp.1997). … In Miranda v.

Campbell v. Brown

146 Mo. App. 319 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1910

[Bayless v. La Faivre, 37 Mo. 119 ; Gray v. Baker, 38 Mo. 160 ; Gartside v. Nixon, 43 Mo. 138 ; Wright v. Richmond, 21 Mo. … [Summers v. Anderson, 36 Mo. 307 ; Smith v. Lydick, 42 Mo. 209 ; Weeks v. Etter, 81 Mo. 375 .]

Johnson v. Brown

154 S.W.3d 448 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 2005

The Circuit Court of Taney County granted Eugene Brown, d/b/a Best Roofing’s (“Respondent”) motion pursuant to Rule 74.06 1 for relief from a judgment *436 entered in favor of Phyllis Johnson (“Appellant”). … We do note, however, that Rule 74.06 does not serve as an alternative to a timely appeal, Love v. Board of Police Com’rs, 943 S.W.2d 862, 863 (Mo.App.

Brown v. Woody

22 Mo. App. 253 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 11, 1886

Brown v. Woody, 64 Mo. 547, 551 . II. … Rombauer, one of the judges of this court, being of opinion that the foregoing decision is contrary to the decision of the supreme court in Brown v.

Brown v. Koffler

133 Mo. App. 494 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 1908

[Carr v. Holbrook, 1 Mo. 240 ; Thayer v. Campbell, 9 Mo. 280 ; Riley’s Admr. v. McCord’s Admr., 24 Mo. 265 ; Fithian v. Monks, 43 Mo. 502 ; State ex rel. v. Evans, 176 Mo. 310 ; Rubey v. Coal Mining Co., 21 Mo. … [Valle’s Admr. v. American Iron Mountain Co., 27 Mo. 455 ; Seiberling v. Tipton, 113 Mo. 373 ; Joerdens v. Schrimpf, 77 Mo. 383 ; Lanier v. McIntosh, 117 Mo. 508 ; Sells v. Tootle, 160 Mo. 606 ; Luther v. Clay, 28 S.

Brown v. State

785 S.W.2d 759 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1990

Movant-appellant, Jerome Brown, appeals from an order of the circuit court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. … State v. Brown, 747 S.W.2d 261 (Mo.App.1988). The detailed facts are stated in that opinion.

Brown v. State

719 S.W.2d 52 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 1986

Brown, appeals the dismissal of his Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief. After the filing of his pro se motion, counsel was appointed to represent appellant. An amended motion was filed. … Bird v. State, 657 S.W.2d 315, 316 (Mo.App.1983). It is only necessary that the plea be knowing and voluntary. Bird v. State, supra; Bradley v. State, 494 S.W.2d 45, 48 (Mo.1973).

State v. Brown

752 S.W.2d 382 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1988

Defendant, Glen Brown, appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, of murder in the first degree. Defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. We affirm. … Strauder v. West Virginia, 10 Otto 303 , 100 U.S. 303 , 25 L.Ed. 664 (1880). Batson v.

State v. Brown

341 S.W.3d 216 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 17, 2011

Edward Brown (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of trafficking in the second degree.

State v. Brown

912 S.W.2d 643 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 1995

State v. Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278, 284 (Mo. banc 1995) (quoting Rule 30.20). … State v. Silvey, 894 S.W.2d 662, 670 (Mo. banc 1995). In State v.

Brown v. Barr

184 Mo. App. 451 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1914

[Murphy v. Wilson, 44 Mo. 313 ; Gray v. McDonald, 104 Mo. 303 ; State v. Orrick, 106 Mo. 111 ; State v. Johnson, 111 Mo. 578 ; State v. Valle, 164 Mo. 539 ; Willi v. Lucas, 110 Mo. 219 ; Brouster v. Fox, 117 Mo. … [State v. Dusenberry, 112 Mo. 277 .]

State v. Brown

1 Mo. App. 449 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 1876

There is , no case before the court respecting Henry Brown. … But the case to which the Henry Brown who died on October 22, 1875, was a party is at an end. To every “ case ” there must be at least two .parties.

State v. Brown

924 S.W.2d 3 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 7, 1996

State v. Gonzalez-Gongora, 673 S.W.2d 811, 813 (Mo.App.1984). … State v. Jeffries, 858 S.W.2d 821, 824 (Mo.App.E.D.1993). The jury was entitled to believe any part of defendant’s four statements they found credible.

Brown v. State

968 S.W.2d 725 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 1998

Calvin Brown, movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand. … See Moore v. State, 934 S.W.2d 289, 291-92 (Mo. banc 1996); Riley v. State, 945 S.W.2d 21, 23-24 (Mo.App. E.D. 1997); State v. Moore, 910 S.W.2d 779, 780 (Mo.App.E.D.1995); State v.

Brown v. State

332 S.W.3d 223 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2010

Brown appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. 1 We have reviewed the briefs

Brown v. Harris

332 S.W.3d 272 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 2011

Georgia Brown (“Appellant”) appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict entered in favor of Karen Harris, D.M.D. (“Respondent”) in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis.

State v. Brown

445 S.W.2d 647 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1969

Defendant cites Sect. 543.020 V.A.M.S. and State v. Wilkson, 36 Mo.App. 373 ; State v. Humble, 34 Mo.App. 343 ; State v. Hatfield, 40 Mo.App. 358 , and State v. Buck, 43 Mo.App. 443 . … In the case of State v.

Brown v. State

755 S.W.2d 414 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1988

Adrian Lamont Brown appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. … Thomas v. State, 605 S.W.2d 792, 794 [3] (Mo. banc 1980); Smith v. State, 743 S.W.2d 900, 901 [4,5] (Mo.App.1988).

Brown v. State

330 S.W.3d 867 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 2011

Yvatni Brown (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment (judgment) denying her Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary

State v. Brown

535 S.W.2d 606 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1976

State v. Shumate, 516 S.W.2d 297 (Mo.App.1974). Rule 84.04(c) requires a fair and concise statement of the facts relevant to the questions presented. … Graff v. Montileone, 523 S.W.2d 131 (Mo.App.1975). The brief contains a page which has the heading “Points and Authorities Relied *607 Upon.”