Opinion

Brown v. Harris

  • 332 S.W.3d 272
  • 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 15
  • 2011 WL 91033
Court
Missouri Court of Appeals
Filed
Jan 11, 2011
Status
Published
On the bench
Odenwald, Dowd, Baker
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Georgia Brown (“Appellant”) appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict entered in favor of Karen Harris, D.M.D. (“Respondent”) in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. Appellant raises two points on appeal. Appellant contends the trial court erred in excluding documents from evidence which Appellant claims were relevant to challenge Respondent’s credibility. Appellant also claims she was prejudiced by the cumulative effect of multiple errors made by the trial court relating to evidentiary rulings.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.