Case law

State v. Mitchell

273 Or. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 19, 2015

Those three factors, which were adopted from Brown v. … See State v.

Porter v. Tiffany

11 Or. App. 542 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1972

Personnel *545 Board, 240 Ala 411, 199 So 815 (1941). As the California Supreme Court stated in Mines v. … The court in Mines v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lasswell

296 Or. 121 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1983

See State v. Robertson/Young, 293 Or 402, 412, 416-417, 433-434 , 649 P2d 569 (1982); State v. Spencer, 289 Or 225, 228 , 611 P2d 1147 (1980). … Chicago Council of Lawyers v. Bauer, 522 F2d 242 (7th Cir 1975), cert den sub nom Cunningham v. Chicago Council of Lawyers, 427 US 912 , 96 S Ct 3201 , 49 L Ed 2d 1204 (1976). 3 The board’s observation is well taken.

Rose v. Wollenberg

39 L.R.A. 378 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1896

Ct. 58); Reed v. Holcomb, 31 Conn. 360 ; Potter v. Brown, 35 Mich. 274 ; Hilliard v. White (Tex. Civ. App.), 31 *281 S. W. 553 ; Emerson v. Slater, 63 U. S. (22 How.), 43. … Ward, 5 Or. 453 ; Brown v. Oregon Lumber Company, 24 Or. 317 ( 33 Pac. 557 ); Vanbebber v. Plunkett, 26 Or. 562 (27 L. R. A. 811, 38 Pac. 708 ); Baldwin v. Fleming, 90 Ind. 177 .

Bedell v. Schiedler

307 Or. 562 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1989

Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, supra, 283 Or at 28 . … See Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, supra, 283 Or at 27, n 7 .

Gilbert v. California Oregon Power Co.

223 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1960

Keller v. Cohen, 224 Pa 434, 73 A 918; Harmer v. Tracey, 115 W Va 349, 176 SE 238 . … Public Market Co. v. Portland, 171 Or 522 , 130 P2d 624 , 138 P2d 916 ; Winklebleck v. City of Portland, 147 Or 226 , 31 P2d 637 .

State v. MacNab

334 Or. 469 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 15, 2002

See Kansas v. … See Dean v.

Agricomp Insurance v. Tapp

169 Or. App. 208 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 26, 2000

SAIF v. Yokum, 132 Or App 18, 24-25 , 887 P2d 380 (1994). … As mentioned above, PAULA’s complaint is that the Board did not apply the rule of law established in SAIF v.

Fischer v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

76 Or. App. 656 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 4, 1985

Tektronix Corp. v. Twist, 62 Or App 602 , 661 P2d 562 , rev den 295 Or 259 (1983). In Knapp v. … Cascade Steel Rolling Mills v. Madril, 62 Or App 598 , 661 P2d 564 , rev den 295 Or 541 (1983), applied the rule in holding that previous overpayments on a prior claim could not be offset in a later claim. Forney v.

Lesher v. Strid

165 Or. App. 34 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 12, 2000

In Wilkinson v. … In Combs v.

Portland Fish Co. v. Benson

56 Or. 147 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1910

Justice Moore in State v. … It is said in Bryan v.

George v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 8R, UMATILLA CTY.

7 Or. App. 183 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 11, 1971

ORS 42.220; Card v. Stirnweis, 232 Or 123 , 374 P2d 472 (1962). … Myers/Sherwood v.

SAIF Corp. v. Terry

126 Or. App. 558 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 1994

As explained in Tee v. Albertsons, Inc., 314 Or 633 , 842 P2d 374 (1992), a “gainful occupation” is one that pays “profitable remuneration.” … See Harris v. SAIF, 292 Or 683, 695 , 642 P2d 1147 (1982); Wiley v. SAIF, 77 Or App 486, 490 , 713 P2d 677 , rev den 301 Or 77 (1986). We conclude that the Board did not err in awarding claimant PTD. Affirmed. Tee v.

Schuler v. Beaverton School District No. 48J

334 Or. 290 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 2002

The Board reversed the AU, noting that the case relied on by the ALJ, SAIF v. … The Board explained, relying on Dietz v.

Weems v. American International Adjustment Co.

319 Or. 140 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1994

The Board disapproved the settlement. On judicial review, the Court of Appeals affirmed the Board’s decision. Weems v. American International Adjustment Co., 123 Or App 83 , 858 P2d 914 (1993). … The Court of Appeals already has addressed that question, Weems v.

State Ex Rel. Gilmore v. Cupp

458 P.2d 711 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 12, 1969

In this proceeding the parole board heard no witnesses nor did it offer Gilmore the opportunity of calling witnesses. The Oregon Supreme Court in Whalen v. … . * * *" Anderson v. Alexander, supra, at 430-431 , 229 P.2d at 642 . The burden of proof of arbitrariness is on the person whose parole is revoked. Anderson v. Alexander, supra, at 440 , 229 P.2d 633 .

Timberline Lodge v. Kyle

97 Or. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 1989

Rogers v. SAIF, 289 Or 633, 643 , 616 P2d 485 (1980). … Clark v. U.S. Plywood, 288 Or 255, 260-261 , 605 P2d 265 (1980). 2. In Mellis v.

Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Allenby

166 Or. App. 331 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 22, 2000

On employer’s petition and claimant’s cross-petition, this case is on review from a Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) order and raises the same issue presented in Boydston v. Liberty Northwest Ins. … The Board erred in invalidating that order.

Zimmerman v. West Coast Trans-Oceanic Steamship Lines

199 Or. 78 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1953

Silver Falls Timber Co. v. Eastern & Western Lumber Co., 149 Or 126 , 40 P2d 703 . … Myrtle Point Transportation Co. v. Port of Coquille River, 86 Or 311 , 168 P 625 .

Taggart v. School District No. 1

96 Or. 422 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1920

Jus *430 tice Harris in Foreman v. … As said in Murphy v. City of Albina, 22 Or. 106, 114 ( 29 Pac. 353, 356 , 29 Am. St.