Case law

Gualano v. Board of School Estimate of the Elizabeth School District

39 N.J. 300 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 18, 1963

Ct. 1908); Board of Education of Long Branch v. Board of Commissioners of Long Branch, 2 N. J. Misc. 150 (Sup. Ct. 1924); Falcone v. Board of Education of Newark, 17 N. J. Misc. 75, 78, 4 A. 2d 687 (C. … Barber v. Board of School Estimate of Elizabeth, 71 N. J. Super. 556.

Browning-Ferris Industries of North Jersey, Inc. v. City of Passaic

116 N.J. 83 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 26, 1989

Auth. v. … Auth. v.

In re Brown

141 N.J. 13 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 5, 1995

ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Supreme Court on May 18,1995, recommending that RONALD D. … BROWN of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State *14 in 1976, and who was thereafter suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months on April 30, 1991, and who remains suspended at this time, be suspended

T.R. Ex Rel. N.R. v. Kingwood Township Board of Education

32 F. Supp. 2d 720 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 23, 1998

See Board of Educ. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 206 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982); see also Susan N. v. Wilson School Dist., 70 F.3d 751, 758 (3d Cir.1995). … See Lascari v. Board of Educ., 116 N.J. 30, 47 , 560 A.2d 1180, 1189 (1989).

Pomanowski v. MONMOUTH CTY. BD. OF RELATORS

89 N.J. 306 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 10, 1982

In Marin County Board of Realtors, Inc. v. … (CCH) ¶ 62,388 (N.D.Ill.1978) (relying on Brown, supra, for proposition that Board membership is acceptable limitation on multiple listing service participation); Colorado ex rel. MacFarlane v.

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

83 N.J.L. 212 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 2, 1912

State Board of Assessors v. Central Railroad, 19 Vroom 146 . … Jones v. Brim, 165 U. S. 180 ; Lowe v. Kansas, 163 Id. 81; Duncan v. Missouri, 152 Id. 377; Hayes v. Missouri, 120 Id. 68; Allen v. Wyckoff, 19 Vroom, 90 . Nor does the ease cited by the defendant (Clausen v.

Desilets Ex Rel. Desilets v. Clearview Regional Board of Education

137 N.J. 585 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 22, 1994

We granted the certification petition of the school board, 134 N.J. 565 , 636 A.2d 522 (1993). … Inst. v. N.N.J.

English v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF TOWN OF BOONTON

161 F. Supp. 2d 344 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Aug 21, 2001

English v. the Board of Education of the Town of Boonton, 135 F.Supp.2d 588 (D.N.J.2001) (“English 7”). … Hadley, 397 U.S. 50 , 90 S.Ct. 791 , 25 L.Ed.2d 45 ; see also Marlboro Township Board of Educ. v. Freehold Regional High School, 992 F.Supp. 756 (D.N.J.1998). III.

Novak v. Camden County Health Services Center Board of Managers

255 N.J. Super. 93 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 25, 1992

The board shall adopt rules regarding the order of layoff and employee rights upon recommendation by the commissioner. … See also Barringer v. Miele, 6 N.J. 139, 145 , 77 A.2d 895 (1951); Byrnes v. Boulevard Com’rs, Hudson Cty., 121 N.J.L. 497, 500 , 3 A.2d 456 (E. & A.1939); Padavano v.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. HOPETON B. BROWN, JR. AND LAMAR A. JONES(10-11-1702, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(CONSOLIDATED)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 1, 2017

A-2466-13T3 A-4115-13T3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HOPETON B. BROWN, JR. and LAMAR A. … See, e.g., State v. Privott, 203 N.J. 16, 29-30 (2010); State v. Basil, 202 N.J. 570, 588-89 (2010); State v. Davis, 104 N.J. 490, 504-05 (1986).

New Jersey Imperial Road Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

80 N.J.L. 640 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 3, 1910

The board of chosen freeholders of any county may, by the statute, sue or be sued, but are given no rights other than those of an ordinary litigant, *641 and the fact that the defendant is a municipality does not make a cause

National Bank v. Middlesex County Board of Taxation

26 N.J. Misc. 249 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 17, 1948

In the case of Second National Bank, &c., v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 114 N. J. L. 573; 178 Atl. … In the case of Second National Bank, &c., v.

Atlantic Coast Electric Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

92 N.J.L. 168 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 17, 1918

Meday v. Rutherford, 65 N. J. L. 645. … In a later case, the subsequent' action was by a state board. Milwaukee Electric Railway v. Wisconsin R. R. Comm., 238 U. S. 174 .

Keister v. Bennett

97 N.J. 686 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 5, 1984

Edison Storage Battery Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

93 N.J.L. 301 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 3, 1919

O'Brien v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 92 N. J. L. 44. After the rates were changed the electric company *303 presentee! … But this question has been determined contrary to 'the prosecutors’ contention by tire Supreme Court of the United States in Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corporation, 248 U.

Forker v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Retirement System

117 N.J. 649 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 6, 1989

Township of North Bergen v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

101 N.J.L. 235 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1925

National Automobile Salvage Service v. Delran Township Board of Adjustment

236 N.J. Super. 579 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 1989

When will a zoning use variance, if granted, have so significant an impact upon a municipal development plan that it is beyond the jurisdiction of a board of adjustment and requires a plan amendment? In Dover Tp. v. … The ability of the zoning board to subject the grant of a variance to appropriate conditions. The imposition of reasonable conditions is permissible. North Plainfield v.

Deborah Jewish Consumptive Relief Society v. State Board of Health

7 N.J. Misc. 418 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 19, 1929

It is not the function of a writ of mandamus to compel the state board of health to perform an act already completed nor to do it in a different way than already done. … Uszkay v. Dill, 92 N. J. L. 327. At all events the power to issue a writ of mandamus is discretionary. Jones Co. v. Town of Gutlenberg, 66 N. J. L. 58. The application for the writ is denied.

Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

86 N.J.L. 696 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 16, 1914